Moderator: Community Team
What if that power role is scum? Do you still not want to risk lynching him? Do you think that there are no mafia power roles out there? A jailer could just as easily be mafia. If you're assuming that the 'Alignment Definer' is true, then it's between me and rish, and you can't just assume that the power role is more valuable to town. He might be more harmful to town.rizky_biznezz wrote:as far as deg and rish i would probably have to vote deg because i dont want to risk lynching another power role...
For me, it's a choice between benga lying about the 'Alignment definer' and rish being scum. I thought rish was town on D4 when he had been jailing Wing, who I thought was scummy. Now that wing is confirmed town, and I see how little Rish has actually contributed to the game, how he seems to be avoiding the game, and how there hasn't been any pressure put on him because of it, I am reasonably comfortable that he is scum.rizky_biznezz wrote:I can't be sure of that and that crossed my mind too.. It should be an easy choice for the 2 of u and yet rish hasn't voted u and u have only just voted him so do u think he is scummy or are u just taking the easy choice now?

Other players who are still alive and are barely contributing:degaston wrote:For me, it's a choice between benga lying about the 'Alignment definer' and rish being scum. I thought rish was town on D4 when he had been jailing Wing, who I thought was scummy. Now that wing is confirmed town, and I see how little Rish has actually contributed to the game, how he seems to be avoiding the game, and how there hasn't been any pressure put on him because of it, I am reasonably comfortable that he is scum.rizky_biznezz wrote:I can't be sure of that and that crossed my mind too.. It should be an easy choice for the 2 of u and yet rish hasn't voted u and u have only just voted him so do u think he is scummy or are u just taking the easy choice now?
not sure why I voted pt, would have to go back in that time of state of mind, assuming night talk was allowed so i thought voting is toorizky_biznezz wrote:@benga why did u vote PT during night 1? It was weird timing.. firstly it was night and we hadn't even seen the aftermath of ppls actions secondly he had just called u out for not reading and thirdly why place a vote when u knew u had investigations?
Also did u have reasons to not trust ur gift? Why did u vote for LSU and not one of the 3 on D4? If u dont even have confidence in it should we? Or did u just not want to be associated with wings lynch?
Sorry these are repeated questions but I'm still waiting for an answer
I have made a few posts, but my contribution was great, I would really appreciate if people would stop confusing those 2 thingsMetsfanmax wrote:Other players who are still alive and are barely contributing:degaston wrote:For me, it's a choice between benga lying about the 'Alignment definer' and rish being scum. I thought rish was town on D4 when he had been jailing Wing, who I thought was scummy. Now that wing is confirmed town, and I see how little Rish has actually contributed to the game, how he seems to be avoiding the game, and how there hasn't been any pressure put on him because of it, I am reasonably comfortable that he is scum.rizky_biznezz wrote:I can't be sure of that and that crossed my mind too.. It should be an easy choice for the 2 of u and yet rish hasn't voted u and u have only just voted him so do u think he is scummy or are u just taking the easy choice now?
- madmitch
- benga
- LSU
- /
- DJPatrick
- twr
- CatchersMitt
Are they all scum too, because no one has put much pressure on them for their inactivity?
Come on, Mets, put a little effort in. I think you know what the difference is between rish and the names you listed. Are you just playing dumb to try to confuse the issue?Metsfanmax wrote:Other players who are still alive and are barely contributing:
- madmitch
- benga
- LSU
- /
- DJPatrick
- twr
- CatchersMitt
Are they all scum too, because no one has put much pressure on them for their inactivity?
I just wanna put dis out dere: feel free to shoot it down if you find a whole in it.degaston wrote:For me, it's a choice between benga lying about the 'Alignment definer' and rish being scum. I thought rish was town on D4 when he had been jailing Wing, who I thought was scummy. Now that wing is confirmed town, and I see how little Rish has actually contributed to the game, how he seems to be avoiding the game, and how there hasn't been any pressure put on him because of it, I am reasonably comfortable that he is scum.rizky_biznezz wrote:I can't be sure of that and that crossed my mind too.. It should be an easy choice for the 2 of u and yet rish hasn't voted u and u have only just voted him so do u think he is scummy or are u just taking the easy choice now?
I.e. teh Mods sed teh 8-borl gave a corect reeding, but dident menshun it wasent a reeding of teh intended target.Iron Butterfly wrote:Benga my magic 8 ball got Town on sausage.
For clarity I asked mod if magic 8 ball works like real life...hehe random results stuff. No magic 8 ball is right.
I wood add Player to dis list. She cheks in but never says enyting of substanse. It's orl 'Am tinking it over' and 'Not sure yet' and stuff like dat.Metsfanmax wrote:Other players who are still alive and are barely contributing:degaston wrote:For me, it's a choice between benga lying about the 'Alignment definer' and rish being scum. I thought rish was town on D4 when he had been jailing Wing, who I thought was scummy. Now that wing is confirmed town, and I see how little Rish has actually contributed to the game, how he seems to be avoiding the game, and how there hasn't been any pressure put on him because of it, I am reasonably comfortable that he is scum.rizky_biznezz wrote:I can't be sure of that and that crossed my mind too.. It should be an easy choice for the 2 of u and yet rish hasn't voted u and u have only just voted him so do u think he is scummy or are u just taking the easy choice now?
- madmitch
- benga
- LSU
- /
- DJPatrick
- twr
- CatchersMitt
Are they all scum too, because no one has put much pressure on them for their inactivity?
If we remove the assumption for the moment that rish is possible scum because of the alignment definer, then his inactivity would not be alignment indicative, because inactivity so rarely is alignment indicative. And indeed even when you take that factor into account, it's still not alignment indicative. Your argument only makes sense if we already believe rish is scum and then this serves to 'explain' his behavior, but this is circular, since it has not yet been established that rish is scum.degaston wrote:Come on, Mets, put a little effort in. I think you know what the difference is between rish and the names you listed. Are you just playing dumb to try to confuse the issue?Metsfanmax wrote:Other players who are still alive and are barely contributing:
- madmitch
- benga
- LSU
- /
- DJPatrick
- twr
- CatchersMitt
Are they all scum too, because no one has put much pressure on them for their inactivity?
Fine. Then would you be so kind as to remove the assumption that I am possible scum because of the alignment definer, and see how much of a case you have against me?Metsfanmax wrote:If we remove the assumption for the moment that rish is possible scum because of the alignment definer, then his inactivity would not be alignment indicative, because inactivity so rarely is alignment indicative. And indeed even when you take that factor into account, it's still not alignment indicative. Your argument only makes sense if we already believe rish is scum and then this serves to 'explain' his behavior, but this is circular, since it has not yet been established that rish is scum.
I don't know how likely or unlikely teh hole ting is, awtho if I am rite about LSU TJ's invenchuns, it does look bad fer Benga.degaston wrote:I can't explain what Rage would have said if I had used the gun in some other way and it still hadn't worked.
The whole thing seems fairly unlikely to me, but I'm not sure that I can rule it out at this point. I haven't gone back over all the posts to see if anything disproves it.
I have already admitted that I don't have much of a case against you other than the alignment definer. However I do trust the alignment definer so this is a pointless exercise. One of either you or rish is scum, in my estimation. I just don't know who, but I think maybe 65-35 that it's you.degaston wrote:Fine. Then would you be so kind as to remove the assumption that I am possible scum because of the alignment definer, and see how much of a case you have against me?Metsfanmax wrote:If we remove the assumption for the moment that rish is possible scum because of the alignment definer, then his inactivity would not be alignment indicative, because inactivity so rarely is alignment indicative. And indeed even when you take that factor into account, it's still not alignment indicative. Your argument only makes sense if we already believe rish is scum and then this serves to 'explain' his behavior, but this is circular, since it has not yet been established that rish is scum.
I certainly do. I have never read alignment from activity level, and I'm not going to start now. It's just too mired up in the fact that sometimes people just don't have time for mafia, regardless of which side they are. As an example of why this is a bad idea, consider that rish going AWOL right now actually seems to look bad from many of your perspectives. So if he's scum and he wants to protect himself, you can argue that he'd get his ass in here and post more to guarantee that you get lynched first. I have no way to distinguish between that scenario and the one you are proposing, so I'm not going to try.If a cop identifies someone as scum, and that person then disappears from the thread, you don't say "If we just ignore the cop check, then his lack of activity doesn't really mean much."
Even if he lost his notes (and there's no proof of that), that's no excuse for only making one post in the past 11 days. Especially considering that he should be considered a possible lynch target today. He had access to a computer, and could read and comment on what's been going on. He's had time to comment on politics and video games, why not mafia?Ragian wrote:I agree that we need Rish in here. Lucky for him, the pace of the game has slowed way, way down. How do you know that he has posted elsewhere? Also, he did say that his computer was in the shop and on his computer are his notes. Maybe that's why he's not contributing? Anyway, we need him to talk.
No one has bothered with this because it's a stupid question. Only mods and OPs can change thread titles. Benga didn't do anything with the thread header, he was just the first one to respond after the thread title was changed.AladdinSane wrote:Insidently, Benga was teh wun who introduced teh "D5 Kills Start" post hedder. I'd still like to know wot he ment by dat, sinse we have been getting NKs on N1, N2, and N4 awreddy. I've asked a cupple times now. It's starting to look like teh qwestjun is been dodged...
You're absolutely right!Metsfanmax wrote:No one has bothered with this because it's a stupid question. Only mods and OPs can change thread titles. Benga didn't do anything with the thread header, he was just the first one to respond after the thread title was changed.AladdinSane wrote:Insidently, Benga was teh wun who introduced teh "D5 Kills Start" post hedder. I'd still like to know wot he ment by dat, sinse we have been getting NKs on N1, N2, and N4 awreddy. I've asked a cupple times now. It's starting to look like teh qwestjun is been dodged...
Just messing with you. I know that's just the post title, not the thread title, so don't get your panties in a bundle.degaston wrote:You're absolutely right!Metsfanmax wrote:No one has bothered with this because it's a stupid question. Only mods and OPs can change thread titles. Benga didn't do anything with the thread header, he was just the first one to respond after the thread title was changed.AladdinSane wrote:Insidently, Benga was teh wun who introduced teh "D5 Kills Start" post hedder. I'd still like to know wot he ment by dat, sinse we have been getting NKs on N1, N2, and N4 awreddy. I've asked a cupple times now. It's starting to look like teh qwestjun is been dodged...![]()
![]()
fp'ed by Deg...dang not qwik enuff...but my qwestjuns dozent looks so stupid now, does it?Metsfanmax wrote: No one has bothered with this because it's a stupid question. Only mods and OPs can change thread titles. Benga didn't do anything with the thread header, he was just the first one to respond after the thread title was changed.
Yes, it still looks stupid. I'm obviously perfectly aware that someone can change the subject line of their own post. The point is that benga didn't do that. Someone changed the actual thread title, and benga was the first to do a clean reply after that happened.AladdinSane wrote:fp'ed by Deg...dang not qwik enuff...but my qwestjuns dozent looks so stupid now, does it?Metsfanmax wrote: No one has bothered with this because it's a stupid question. Only mods and OPs can change thread titles. Benga didn't do anything with the thread header, he was just the first one to respond after the thread title was changed.
Denied/ wrote:
Can we please have a slight extension please mods?