Moderator: Community Team

It just doesn't make any sense to use the label "insane", then. Read about cop vs. insane cop here. If the inventions flipped the user and the target, it makes no sense to use the label "insane".rizky_biznezz wrote:Im not completely against the idea of lsus inventions flipping to the user.. It is possible.. IBs 8 ball on sausage gave town reading posibly IB is town... LSU used sweater on storr and read lsus role, benga used glasses on IB possibly benga has blood on his hands, benga used blood kit got anti town which fits in with the glasses theory.. But it's a lot of possibilities and no evidence... Which brings us back to deg and rish.. Deg was close to being lynched but I can't really recall much of a case other than the invention so I will have to go back and read

Sure, I'll take that deal. Are you now going to switch your vote to benga?Metsfanmax wrote:deg, one you think you could do if you really believe your case that benga is scum, is to precommit that you will allow us to lynch you first over rish, if benga flips town, and precommit that you'll vote for yourself in this scenario too. If you push for a benga lynch and he flips town that doesn't prove you are scum, but it certainly updates our belief in that direction, and there remains no plausible argument that rish is a better lynch than you.
If you thought rish was scummy, then why didn't you investigate him? Getting a town result would have confirmed that Mets' theory is correct (because if mine is correct, then you will always get a scum result), and that rish was scum. We then could have lynched rish, and if he flipped town, we would know that you were lying. If you got a scum result (meaning he's town), then we could have lynched me and when I flipped town we would know that my theory was correct, and that you are scum. But because you didn't do that, we are left guessing about what the best thing to do is.benga wrote:so why investigate rizky and not deg?
I had also earlier chance to do so, but seems to me waste of time to use 2 gifts on same thing
that might collide with degs lynch yesterday, but in no hell I am dropping townie just for sake of it, Can you explain what you mean by this?
especially if rish seems scummier to me
Haven't you bin payin atenshun? Teh swetter LSU TJ gave Storr reported on teh user (LSU TJ) insted of teh target (storr). It's easier fer me to beleeve orl LSU TJ's gifts are insane in teh same way than that dey were orl insane in diffrent ways.Ragian wrote:Whatever, Aladdin.
Insanity flips results, it doesn't swap user-target.
Not just yet. But this does soften my stance towards you slightly since I wouldn't expect scum to agree with it. So for now I'll unvote.degaston wrote:Sure, I'll take that deal. Are you now going to switch your vote to benga?Metsfanmax wrote:deg, one you think you could do if you really believe your case that benga is scum, is to precommit that you will allow us to lynch you first over rish, if benga flips town, and precommit that you'll vote for yourself in this scenario too. If you push for a benga lynch and he flips town that doesn't prove you are scum, but it certainly updates our belief in that direction, and there remains no plausible argument that rish is a better lynch than you.
So guess it did not occur to you, or maybe it did,to check those who tried to bandwagon alladin?Metsfanmax wrote:@rish: we need to know who you jailed last night. Are you the one that blocked Ragian?
Oh, since I'm demanding that, I should say I investigated benga last night, for reasons similar to what deg was arguing. No gun.

I'm not going to play WIFOM on this. Could just as well be that benga is the most expendable if he's scum. As you say, my role is akin to hitting the lottery, so I'm not really spending a lot of time thinking about useful targets. And I would catch flak if I 'investigated' PLAYER or anyone else, because everyone's a critic. So come off it.Iron Butterfly wrote:So guess it did not occur to you, or maybe it did,to check those who tried to bandwagon alladin?Metsfanmax wrote:@rish: we need to know who you jailed last night. Are you the one that blocked Ragian?
Oh, since I'm demanding that, I should say I investigated benga last night, for reasons similar to what deg was arguing. No gun.
Benga, if he is scum is under scrutiny to begin with and so he would be the last player on a scum team to be asked to do the kill. One could second guess it all they want...I still think it is a stupid choice.

What did make, and who did you try to give it to?Ragian wrote:Well played, scum. They nightkilled LSU and blocked me.
We are totally no where near lynch.degaston wrote: I think we should avoid getting anywhere close to a lynch until rish responds.
Iron Butterfly wrote:Its like Dj is not even playing this game except to pop in and f*ck with the votes while saying shit Captain Obvious would envy saying.
I agree with the observation on DJ and I would also add slash to this list. Player also just stops by to vote without any resoning at all but I think she isn't at the same level of unhelpfullness as the other two.Iron Butterfly wrote:I think we need to also discus who outside these three is mafia. Can we make blocks to isolate them? Divide and conquer as they say.
Yes! Fiannly someone else on board with discussing something other than what the alignment indicator gave us! I've been trying to get this point across for the past two days. Again, I'm not saying we HAVE to vote ouside of those three, but there are definitly things we need to observate other than them.Iron Butterfly wrote:Do not take this post as anything writen in stone...it is more thinking out loud. I write because I do not want this day a repeat of yesterday where we get bogged down with BS about the Holy Trinity.
@benga, we were close to lunching you yesterday. Why wouldn't you use the gift to help convince us of your alignment or that one of the other two are scum? You said it seemed to be a waste to use two gifts for the same purpose but wouldn't one think that it would make it easier to convince us to lynch someone if there are two strikes against them instead of one? One possibility is that you're scum and trying to ensure the is nothing to make the voting decision easier.benga wrote:so why investigate rizky and not deg?
I had also earlier chance to do so, but seems to me waste of time to use 2 gifts on same thing
that might collide with degs lynch yesterday, but in no hell I am dropping townie just for sake of it,
especially if rish seems scummier to me
I've already answered this a couple of times. It doesn't matter whether we believe you or not. If you had investigated either rish or me, and reported your results, we could reverse the results, and lynch the one who is indicated as scum. If that person flips scum, great. If they flip town, then you must be scum and we lynch you. If instead, we lynch you first and you flip town, then we know your investigation can be trusted, and we lynch the one who you identified as scum. No matter what happens, we are guaranteed that we at least get scum with the second lynch. (Do you understand it now, Mets?)benga wrote:First of all my provided info is not trusted, what would have happened if I investigated deg and rish when you guys don't trust that earlier results.
Again, this has already been answered. Mets claims that his investigation only returns true if he investigates someone on the night that they kill.benga wrote:Also get your heads straight, some of you saying lsu gifts reflect on me, then I should have blood on my hands, so how come I don't have gun?
Since we've seen no indication of redirection, your investigation is not trusted because we don't know your alignment. If you flip town, or identify a scum, then your results would be trusted more.benga wrote:Also my 2nd investigation during night isn't trusted cause it was during night, but others were also cleared during night and they are trusted.
We can only lynch one person each day. It didn't do any good to investigate rizky while your first accusation is still unproven.benga wrote:All I can do is get as much information as I can for town and I am doing it, it's not my fault if people keep neglecting it.