jgordon1111 rants to IcePack thread

[jmyork82]

Concise description:

• move to off topic

Specifics/Details:

• locking it may not be a bad idea either

How this will benefit the site and/or other comments:

• this thread is no longer about the OP

[IcePack]

I know a number of people who's game counts hover around 5-10 (including my own lately). You don't think this would have the opposite affect and have those borderline game players not renew?

In my mind I would restrict more settings to premium only, but increase game load?
I don't know...I haven't thought it all through but that's my immediate reaction / thought

[jmyork82]

there are surely pluses and minuses in any decision and that's a decent point. I'm sure BW could look at numbers on existing premiums and see how many hover at that game count. He could then make an educated guess on if that would affect the overall premium accounts.

Another thing that I though of, if you give premiums a few more games to work with, they could participate in tournaments easier. Sometimes a tournament goes over the max 4 games in order to participate. But some may argue, thats how you entice people to go premium.

Just like anything, you could argue for or against it. Just an idea that popped in my head and figured I would throw it to the wolves.

[jgordon1111]

I know a number of people who's game counts hover around 5-10 (including my own lately). You don't think this would have the opposite affect and have those borderline game players not renew?

In my mind I would restrict more settings to premium only, but increase game load?
I don't know...I haven't thought it all through but that's my immediate reaction / thought

Ah the gratuitous nay say as usual
Unfortunately the op doesn't know that only changes made here come only when the longevity crew bring them up and approve

Op in the future look them up and let them present as their idea, you might get something done, probably not CC is running smooth with no issues that can't be handled

Much like the republican party in America, they are slightly out of touch with reality

[jgordon1111]

Oh and if you think that CC is run by the paltry premium fee, you are highly mistaken try reading the user agreement CAREFULLY all of it especially the part where CC has the right to

Suck that up ice cube

[IcePack]

I know a number of people who's game counts hover around 5-10 (including my own lately). You don't think this would have the opposite affect and have those borderline game players not renew?

In my mind I would restrict more settings to premium only, but increase game load?
I don't know...I haven't thought it all through but that's my immediate reaction / thought

Ah the gratuitous nay say as usual
Unfortunately the op doesn't know that only changes made here come only when the longevity crew bring them up and approve

Op in the future look them up and let them present as their idea, you might get something done, probably not CC is running smooth with no issues that can't be handled

Much like the republican party in America, they are slightly out of touch with reality

Nay say? I gave an honest immediate reaction and even said I hadn't thought everything through. I was adding to the discussion and even "thought out loud" a possible adjustment. Trying to think of & discuss pros and cons isn't nay saying.

Longevity crew? Give me a break, I have been a team leader that long.

Oh and if you think that CC is run by the paltry premium fee, you are highly mistaken try reading the user agreement CAREFULLY all of it especially the part where CC has the right to

Suck that up ice cube

Did I say it was run single handedly by premium fees? The more you post the less seriously I take you. I'm trying to discuss and go over suggestions, while all youve been doing is attacking me personally for joining in the discussion. Get over yourself mate. Your suggestions were not all that. And it's very difficult to understand your posts sometimes, making more sense when you type a suggestion and following the formats will make things easier to understand. I suggest you try it sometime, unless you just want to stir up more nonsense

[WingCmdr Ginkapo]

Sometimes a tournament goes over the max 4 games in order to participate.

There is already a system in place that allows freemiums to go over the 4 game limit for certain tournaments.

[jgordon1111]

I know a number of people who's game counts hover around 5-10 (including my own lately). You don't think this would have the opposite affect and have those borderline game players not renew?

In my mind I would restrict more settings to premium only, but increase game load?
I don't know...I haven't thought it all through but that's my immediate reaction / thought

Ah the gratuitous nay say as usual
Unfortunately the op doesn't know that only changes made here come only when the longevity crew bring them up and approve

Op in the future look them up and let them present as their idea, you might get something done, probably not CC is running smooth with no issues that can't be handled

Much like the republican party in America, they are slightly out of touch with reality

Nay say? I gave an honest immediate reaction and even said I hadn't thought everything through. I was adding to the discussion and even "thought out loud" a possible adjustment. Trying to think of & discuss pros and cons isn't nay saying.

Longevity crew? Give me a break, I have been a team leader that long.

Oh and if you think that CC is run by the paltry premium fee, you are highly mistaken try reading the user agreement CAREFULLY all of it especially the part where CC has the right to

Suck that up ice cube

Did I say it was run single handedly by premium fees? The more you post the less seriously I take you. I'm trying to discuss and go over suggestions, while all youve been doing is attacking me personally for joining in the discussion. Get over yourself mate. Your suggestions were not all that. And it's very difficult to understand your posts sometimes, making more sense when you type a suggestion and following the formats will make things easier to understand. I suggest you try it sometime, unless you just want to stir up more nonsense

Yes you have been around for a while, so you realize how to say phrases in such a way as to show positive reinforcement or negative, read your post again, and give a honest analysis of what you did. I already gave my view of it. Odd you can tell when i am negative but you don't know when you are, that implies deception on your part

[jgordon1111]

And just to be clear, You already knew that the premium fees didn't pay for this sites being operated and funded?

If you say no now, reread your previous statement!

[jmyork82]

what do you think jgordon? Do you think an increase in games for freemiums would help bridge the gap into premium?

[jgordon1111]

what do you think jgordon? Do you think an increase in games for freemiums would help bridge the gap into premium?

It does not matter what we any of us think or want, and ice cube can deny and try to bite me, but here is a truth his kind do not understand or anticipate, I care not a whit what ANYONE, thinks of me or about MY opinions, what I do care about is that it is a level playing field, for all actually make the fucking dice random, your never going to convice me on multiple occassions that 11+ against 1 lose even the odds of random dice that's a stretch, casinos can rig the odds on every machine, so it shows when a game site rigs the game in favor of certain players. Lets see hmmm, my stats say I win 30% of my games so count how many games I have played in just the last 4 months and find my games won lol, that shit don't come near to matching up, so in short CUBE yes I am now calling you out for your direct support of a rigged system.
It's a game for amusement, the real amusement is the longevity crew trying to keep change out and blindly supporting a rigged game site, only because they benefit from it and f*ck everyone else.

[jgordon1111]

Cube your mistake was you admitted to knowing the premium fees were not what soley supported this site.
My mistake will have been calling you out on it
Not really a mistake for me because my amusement with this site was drawing to a conclusion.

[IcePack]

I know a number of people who's game counts hover around 5-10 (including my own lately). You don't think this would have the opposite affect and have those borderline game players not renew?

In my mind I would restrict more settings to premium only, but increase game load?
I don't know...I haven't thought it all through but that's my immediate reaction / thought

Ah the gratuitous nay say as usual
Unfortunately the op doesn't know that only changes made here come only when the longevity crew bring them up and approve

Op in the future look them up and let them present as their idea, you might get something done, probably not CC is running smooth with no issues that can't be handled

Much like the republican party in America, they are slightly out of touch with reality

Nay say? I gave an honest immediate reaction and even said I hadn't thought everything through. I was adding to the discussion and even "thought out loud" a possible adjustment. Trying to think of & discuss pros and cons isn't nay saying.

Longevity crew? Give me a break, I have been a team leader that long.

Oh and if you think that CC is run by the paltry premium fee, you are highly mistaken try reading the user agreement CAREFULLY all of it especially the part where CC has the right to

Suck that up ice cube

Did I say it was run single handedly by premium fees? The more you post the less seriously I take you. I'm trying to discuss and go over suggestions, while all youve been doing is attacking me personally for joining in the discussion. Get over yourself mate. Your suggestions were not all that. And it's very difficult to understand your posts sometimes, making more sense when you type a suggestion and following the formats will make things easier to understand. I suggest you try it sometime, unless you just want to stir up more nonsense

Yes you have been around for a while, so you realize how to say phrases in such a way as to show positive reinforcement or negative, read your post again, and give a honest analysis of what you did. I already gave my view of it. Odd you can tell when i am negative but you don't know when you are, that implies deception on your part

Again, my feedback maybe negative in your view (I was giving constructive criticism) not saying don't change it but questioning what type of change to make and asking questions.

Your negativity wasn't on topic at all, didn't provide anything to the discussion except to criticize me. Anyway, clearly your intent based on last few posts is to be disruptive and not constructive, so im going to only respond to posts about his actual suggestion so as to not derail his thread/suggestion.

what do you think jgordon? Do you think an increase in games for freemiums would help bridge the gap into premium?

It does not matter what we any of us think or want, and ice cube can deny and try to bite me, but here is a truth his kind do not understand or anticipate, I care not a whit what ANYONE, thinks of me or about MY opinions, what I do care about is that it is a level playing field, for all actually make the fucking dice random, your never going to convice me on multiple occassions that 11+ against 1 lose even the odds of random dice that's a stretch, casinos can rig the odds on every machine, so it shows when a game site rigs the game in favor of certain players. Lets see hmmm, my stats say I win 30% of my games so count how many games I have played in just the last 4 months and find my games won lol, that shit don't come near to matching up, so in short CUBE yes I am now calling you out for your direct support of a rigged system.
It's a game for amusement, the real amusement is the longevity crew trying to keep change out and blindly supporting a rigged game site, only because they benefit from it and f*ck everyone else.

His kind? What am I, a alien?
Welcome to the crazy club and my foe list.
Support of a rigged system in favor of select people? Please. This has been argued to death elsewhere. I'll mail you your tinfoil hat.

[jgordon1111]

[jgordon1111]

Ty for proving beyond a doubt one of my points
Yes CRAZY
And you took the bait, so not only did you prove me right, but showed yourself to be a fool hardy boot licking toady in the process.
One last question how many of your RL friends and possibly family members did you sell down the river for your pretend standing on a game site?
If you can honestly answer, I give you my word never to address you here again unless you say anything about me or the few here I call friend.

[jgordon1111]

Green

[jmyork82]

what do you think jgordon? Do you think an increase in games for freemiums would help bridge the gap into premium?

It does not matter what we any of us think or want, and ice cube can deny and try to bite me, but here is a truth his kind do not understand or anticipate, I care not a whit what ANYONE, thinks of me or about MY opinions, what I do care about is that it is a level playing field, for all actually make the fucking dice random, your never going to convice me on multiple occassions that 11+ against 1 lose even the odds of random dice that's a stretch, casinos can rig the odds on every machine, so it shows when a game site rigs the game in favor of certain players. Lets see hmmm, my stats say I win 30% of my games so count how many games I have played in just the last 4 months and find my games won lol, that shit don't come near to matching up, so in short CUBE yes I am now calling you out for your direct support of a rigged system.
It's a game for amusement, the real amusement is the longevity crew trying to keep change out and blindly supporting a rigged game site, only because they benefit from it and f*ck everyone else.

wait, are you the same guy from another thread who suggested that their win % was bad due to dice and everybody else was like "nah, maybe you're just not as good as you think you are"?