Moderator: Community Team
Talapus wrote: Stop assuming, this is one of the problems. We don't "know" all this for certain, we have guesses as to how this is working but unless you care to share information that proves all this crap(Which I highly doubt you have) than stop making blatant statements about things we are still guessing and figuring out because this will lead to other people who can't seem to stop skimming to use those numbers to base their votes off of.
This is how I know there are 3 definite NATO; we don't know for sure anything else, but the rest seem like 3rd party based on what people are claiming.ptlowe wrote:So as you may or may not know due to my outburst previously. I am a NATO country. Not some dumb villager but the actual country. I am revealing this because I have two allies. Niether of which is Jordan.
One person went to the dark side because of the failed airbombing. If we make the VERY reasonable assumption based on the clues provided by LSU when describing the setup, there is at least one recruiter (ISIS). Thus, he/she could have recruited during the night, and in fact there is no reason not to recruit during the night, we can safely assume they did, since that is their objective. Unless we see a night kill that isn't from a vig then we can only go with the assumption that ISIS recruit but don't kill. That totals 3 ISIS day 2. I am not making anything up. These are reasonable assumptions based on the evidence so far.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:During the night, many things started to take place. A rumor was heard that Iran was helping out ISIS. An airstrike was called in to try to eliminate them. Unfortunately, it was bad intel and an innocent civilian died. Upon hearing of this innocent dying, someone new from the mideast decided that they needed to go after the western devils to avenge Iran.
Okay, I'll believe you because of this:Tobikera wrote:There are no replacements, jb. I asked. The mod said he even messaged around trying to find one for me and could not. We're stuck with each other.jbfloyd wrote:I think Tala is the best option. I have seen people feign frustration before and vote themselves thinking it could make them seem town. It's a weird setup and maybe he doesn't want to play it, but still, then ask for a replacement...
But still keeping my FOS on you. I also agree with you on HS, I've been suspicious of him from the start I just didn't really know why.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:I am also looking for a replacement in my mafia game.
jbfloyd wrote: then ask for a replacement...
BuJaber wrote:LSU: in the post I quoted, were you looking for a replacement for Talapus? Thanks.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus
You lying sack of cunt!
I will haunt you foreverdakky21 wrote:I believe mitch is dead now. Finally people listened to me.

Good 6 hours and a half passedLSU Tiger Josh wrote:Ok deadline has been reached. I don't have time to post a scene just yet because had a short break due to a meeting. No talking from here on out. Hopefully I'll get the scene out in about an hour and a half.
Hmmmm, no night kill, so mitch was their only killer? And, does this mean there is no NATO killer? However, the negotiations quoted above means someone was probably recruited. I would note that use of the word "negotiations" and "Those" implies more than one recruitment? Or, misdirectional blather by the mod?LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Daylight has arrived. No deaths came to be during the night although there were many secret negotiations that took place. Those that have been negotiated with will be getting their pms shortly, but there will be no talking until nightfall.

What do you mean by this LSU? Are we allowed to talk? It seems ISIS TWR and Tobi are doing so.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:, but there will be no talking until nightfall.

And the needle returns to the start of the song...Talapus wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:
I cannot reward fustration. If we do people use these tactics when scum. And that is unacceptable. If you are willing to give up, I would rather you die now than later.
So first it is because I'm scum and now it's because of frustration, you are off your game on this one for sure wing.
As for a mitch vote, I can actually get behind that, I still think he had zero problem attempting to hammer yesterday when he wasn't sure of count. Since deadline is coming up there is still time to hear from him, so
Unvote
Vote: Mitch
Request for clarification on the continued attack on Talapus. He did vote to lynch mitch in the end. Is your theory that he threw mitch under the bus to save his scummy self, or that he is some kind of 3rd party risk? Or do you just not care either way?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:And the needle returns to the start of the song...Talapus wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:
I cannot reward fustration. If we do people use these tactics when scum. And that is unacceptable. If you are willing to give up, I would rather you die now than later.
So first it is because I'm scum and now it's because of frustration, you are off your game on this one for sure wing.
As for a mitch vote, I can actually get behind that, I still think he had zero problem attempting to hammer yesterday when he wasn't sure of count. Since deadline is coming up there is still time to hear from him, so
Unvote
Vote: Mitch
Vote Talapus