[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Comments: A snip of the board in round 13 is attached. Rad Roofer (green) is strongest player at this point with 21 territories and getting 20 troops last turn. Rad Roofer moves before prime minister1 (blue) - Prime minister1 should have taken Coris from Rad Roofer because it is adjacent to objective Antioch and complete bonus group. Only one territory was lost to the other so far in the game. Prime minister1 has spent nearly the whole game parked and gone nowhere, not like a player with a 28% winning average.
Comments: A snip of the board in round 13 is attached. Rad Roofer (green) is strongest player at this point with 21 territories and getting 20 troops last turn. Rad Roofer moves before prime minister1 (blue) - Prime minister1 should have taken Coris from Rad Roofer because it is adjacent to objective Antioch and complete bonus group. Only one territory was lost to the other so far in the game. Prime minister1 has spent nearly the whole game parked and gone nowhere, not like a player with a 28% winning average.
Other way round - Prime minister1 is 38%. It's not that extraordinary, I have 40% - but I play mostly 3-player games, with the occasional 2 and 4 player, so it's only just over expectation. He seems to play a fair few doubles games.
This is only their second game together.
Win percentages rely solely on the type of games you play. If you play 4 player games and you're an average player, you'll be on 25%; 5 player games 20% etc. It's not a reliable statistic to judge a player by.
Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.
I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.
mrswdk wrote:Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.
I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.
Thanks.
-WDK
Bollocks.
I really think it would help if you didn't keep derailing these threads.
If I were a mod, I'd warn you about it and a possible forum holiday/ban. Is it worth risking that?
mrswdk wrote:Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.
I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.
Thanks.
-WDK
Bollocks.
I really think it would help if you didn't keep derailing these threads.
If I were a mod, I'd warn you about it and a possible forum holiday/ban. Is it worth risking that?
Is it worth risking clangfield saying he doesn't like my input?
mrswdk wrote:Right. My % is 44, pretty sure I've seen a bunch of people pushing or even above 50.
I would like to use this opportunity to reconfirm my accusation of saxitoxin as a multi. I am currently playing a game with him on Indian Empire, 1v1. He managed to win our last few 1v1 games, but is losing this one. Such a serious tactical error (losing the game) suggests he must have an ulterior motive. The obvious answer is that he is a multi of nietzsche. Ban them both.
Thanks.
-WDK
Bollocks.
I really think it would help if you didn't keep derailing these threads.
If I were a mod, I'd warn you about it and a possible forum holiday/ban. Is it worth risking that?
Is it worth risking clangfield saying he doesn't like my input?
not sure anyone here does, mrs - maybe stick to trolling OT...
