Moderator: Community Team
they can actually attempt to have their ban lifted under the new CC regime... i thought it was kind of funny how CC promoted a certain type of negative behaviour within the forums, then removed that portion of the forums and seemed utterly baffled that people continued to carry on in that manner in other portions of the forums!!! it was like they had never been to flame wars or something... anyway... the black jesus has spoken...-el Jesus negrowrestler1ump wrote:It was so much fun when there was a flame wars forum here. We need to get it back. Too bad so many of those people are banned now.

Considering this is the first "bring back flame wars" thread I've seen in quite some time, I'd say yes.BigBallinStalin wrote:The problem is one of negative externalities. Too many people don't want Flame War behavior spilling into other subfora, but they can't do much to prevent that. And, the Flame War participants don't care enough to limit their 'production of flames' into only Flame Wars.
Then, as far as I can guess, CC viewed constraining FW behavior to only Flame Wars as too costly, so the cheapest policy was prohibiting Flame Wars all together.
Do the benefits of prohibiting Flame Wars offset the costs?

You are a commie, pinko, rat bastard...who cares what you think?BigBallinStalin wrote:The problem is one of negative externalities. Too many people don't want Flame War behavior spilling into other subfora, but they can't do much to prevent that. And, the Flame War participants don't care enough to limit their 'production of flames' into only Flame Wars.
Then, as far as I can guess, CC viewed constraining FW behavior to only Flame Wars as too costly, so the cheapest policy was prohibiting Flame Wars all together.
Do the benefits of prohibiting Flame Wars offset the costs?
really? i thought it was a place people went to deal with their oedipus complexes and to deny/squash their homoerotic desires... the black jesus has never been to flame wars...-el Jesus negrowrestler1ump wrote:Sometimes people have arguments in games and they need to duke it out on the forum. That is the great purpose of flame wars.

Here is the funniest use of Oedipus EVER...sadly, many do not get the joke.owenshooter wrote:really? i thought it was a place people went to deal with their oedipus complexes and to deny/squash their homoerotic desires... the black jesus has never been to flame wars...-el Jesus negrowrestler1ump wrote:Sometimes people have arguments in games and they need to duke it out on the forum. That is the great purpose of flame wars.
fixedloutil wrote:Here is the funniest use of Oedipus EVER...sadly, many do not get the joke.owenshooter wrote:really? i thought it was a place people went to deal with their oedipus complexes and to deny/squash their homoerotic desires... the black jesus has never been to flame wars...-el Jesus negrowrestler1ump wrote:Sometimes people have arguments in games and they need to duke it out on the forum. That is the great purpose of flame wars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0quUM-Nr2c

Thank you. Makes me laugh every time I see it...owenshooter wrote:fixedloutil wrote:Here is the funniest use of Oedipus EVER...sadly, many do not get the joke.owenshooter wrote:really? i thought it was a place people went to deal with their oedipus complexes and to deny/squash their homoerotic desires... the black jesus has never been to flame wars...-el Jesus negrowrestler1ump wrote:Sometimes people have arguments in games and they need to duke it out on the forum. That is the great purpose of flame wars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0quUM-Nr2c
in before the move to suggestions...-Jnwrestler1ump wrote:I still say we should bring back flame wars and anyone that was banned from back then should be unbanned (i.e. Norse, BKbarunt).


RULE 4. Do NOT quote this forum anywhere else or contact a user to inform them they are mentioned in here.
