then you must be scum VOTE DDS my as well see what happensDirtyDishSoap wrote:Never claimed vanilla. I'm merely saying I am an animal, role not stated. No harm comes from this, and if it clears Sam, I don't see the issue with it.
Moderator: Community Team
then you must be scum VOTE DDS my as well see what happensDirtyDishSoap wrote:Never claimed vanilla. I'm merely saying I am an animal, role not stated. No harm comes from this, and if it clears Sam, I don't see the issue with it.
uvote vote DDS I still think that Samlen is a better target, but DDS was the original No Lynch advocate and has made an confusing claim in aid of Samlen, so I feel good about his chances of being scum.madmitch wrote:then you must be scum VOTE DDS my as well see what happensDirtyDishSoap wrote:Never claimed vanilla. I'm merely saying I am an animal, role not stated. No harm comes from this, and if it clears Sam, I don't see the issue with it.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
my role/character has a name,mandalorian2298 wrote:I'm sorry to put you on the spot through no fault of your own, but since this would de facto counterclaim Sam, I have to ask for clarification: Are you saying that your character is unnamed in the original movie but you have have been given a name, along with the species (something like "Barbarian Steve" in MM's Civilisation Mafia)?benga wrote:I don't know for others, but I was given a roll with a name, sam has no name he is just a part of herd?
That is some weak claim. Seems we are heading with no lynch on D1. My vote is staying as it is, for now.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
I just feel too many people are 'bandwagoning' claimsDirtyDishSoap wrote:What's confusing about it? What's hard to understand? That I didn't fully reveal the claim and thus protecting myself...On day 1? Or that I'm trying to get Sam out of the fire anyways because he's town?
And why wouldn't I defend someone with the same stance as myself? It's a god damn play style. Maybe not common for you, or this site (clearly), but it's to me, viable. Not for every situation (Alien), but in these types of games, I like to err on the side of caution.
how do you know sam is town?DirtyDishSoap wrote:What's confusing about it? What's hard to understand? That I didn't fully reveal the claim and thus protecting myself...On day 1? Or that I'm trying to get Sam out of the fire anyways because he's town?
And why wouldn't I defend someone with the same stance as myself? It's a god damn play style. Maybe not common for you, or this site (clearly), but it's to me, viable. Not for every situation (Alien), but in these types of games, I like to err on the side of caution.
Because his claim at this point makes sense to me. If there's any other reason to doubt the guy, have the cop watch him and confirm.benga wrote:how do you know sam is town?DirtyDishSoap wrote:What's confusing about it? What's hard to understand? That I didn't fully reveal the claim and thus protecting myself...On day 1? Or that I'm trying to get Sam out of the fire anyways because he's town?
And why wouldn't I defend someone with the same stance as myself? It's a god damn play style. Maybe not common for you, or this site (clearly), but it's to me, viable. Not for every situation (Alien), but in these types of games, I like to err on the side of caution.
Sure, and I changed my stance to suit the needs of the setting.madmitch wrote:you can't compare 1 game to another, all are different ,you know that so why even bring it up? just because you are town in one don't make it so in this one, my vote stands
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Well, at least I don't have to call you "the 4th" any more.kwanton wrote:Sam's claim is also believable to me. He was the first to confirm that he was a nameless vanilla townie and others (including myself) have confirmed that role exists. Fake claiming a nameless character in a theme like this while being the first to claim would be pretty ballsy for a mafia. Not a safe move unless the mod gave us fake claims

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
mandalorian2298 wrote:Au contraire, mon frère, this latest piece of ahem, questionable play, is quite useful. Consider:HotShot53 wrote:Umm... everyone please stop claiming... if all the vanilla's claim then you're just letting scum know everyone else is a power role to target.
There are 15 players left . Among them, it's reasonable to assume are:
3 scumsters (Scar, Shenzi & Ed (since limp biscuits seem unable to get a simple Day 1 decision right and lynch him)
+
8 or 9 characters from the movie ( Lions: Simba, Mufasa, Sarabi, Nala, Sarafina (Nala's mom, possibly left out but unlikely since there are so few named characters); Zazu, Timon, Pumba and Rafiki)
---------------------------------------
12 (or 11)
+
3 (possibly 4) vanilla townies, currently claimed by DDS, Samlen and Kwanton.
= 15
This being so, here is the new plan (assuming that you people actually want to win this):
1) If you are a VANILLA NO-NAME TOWNIE CLAIM NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE!
Since I sincerely doubt that there are 8 players who are both pro-town as well as possessing the level o competency and diligence to secure a Day 1 lynch, the end of the week might as well serve as our deadline for that. If no additional paw or hoof is raised, we can assume that the original three (DDS, Kwanton and Samlen) are proven townies.
2) Starting from DAY 2 three random players out of the remaining 12 (decided by the first 3 numbers drawn for EUROJACKPOT (there is a youtube recording of every drawing, which is why I think it's the simplest public randomizer to use) mod 12, 9, 6 and 3 (on Days 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively) CLAIM THEIR NAMES. If they lie, I assume that counterclaiming is within everyone's mafia skill set?
3) If there are more the 3 vanillas alive after Day 1 ends, I humbly suggest that Cop pick his target among them.
4) When claim-counterclaim does happen, if we have been blessed with a smart Day Vig as opposed to smart JOAT, he/she can wack the guy who claimed first right away and, if he flips Town we lynch the accuser. One dead Townie for 1 dead Scum = good for the Town.
5) Finally, regarding the whole "Play the game, not the setup" thing - put me in a game with 15 real players who really want to play and I would be absolutely delighted to.
Fast posted by DDS:
So, DDS is not claiming that he is a nameless animal who is possibly a power role. It saddens me to think how little in the way of skill is required to lynch him and/or Samlen after the way hey have been playing, and yet even that modest requirement is above the this game's Town's abilities.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
It's very possible. I mean if you can see this sort of thing happening why not do something like that. I can't say that Nag HAS done that but I do think it is possible that he has.mandalorian2298 wrote:There a 9 named characters potentially Town characters in the movie and, probably, 12 Townies- Where do the fake roles come from? You think that Nag has left out Sarabi so that he can save a fake claim for the scum?
As for the whole, "Map for scum to target power roles" objection, I have clearly specified that the point is to claim names. Since the characters are animals, I really don't see how knowing that someone is, for example, Timon halps Mafia know which power role he is.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
ga7 is the co-mod. You know, the guy who spent all of Civ Mafia complaining about not having a fake claim. I'm 99% sure nag wouldn't be alive right now if he hadn't put them in.Fircoal wrote: Goodness this is a horrible plan. Look you have no idea whether the mafia have fake claims or not.
Completely pointless as as I've just said, there's bound to be fake claims given. We'll just end up with 15 town claims and no counter-claims. Big waste of time.mandy wrote:2) Starting from DAY 2 three random players out of the remaining 12 (decided by the first 3 numbers drawn for EUROJACKPOT (there is a youtube recording of every drawing, which is why I think it's the simplest public randomizer to use) mod 12, 9, 6 and 3 (on Days 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively) CLAIM THEIR NAMES. If they lie, I assume that counterclaiming is within everyone's mafia skill set?
Yeah well, no-one has taken my idea of pressuring one of the lurkers (Tim, Flores) seriously, so welcome to the club boyo. I'd much rather do that then continue on this current trend.mandy wrote:So, DDS is not claiming that he is a nameless animal who is possibly a power role. It saddens me to think how little in the way of skill is required to lynch him and/or Samlen after the way hey have been playing, and yet even that modest requirement is above the this game's Town's abilities.
I don't think there's much there. It's clear he means 'us' as in the whole group of players when taken into context with the rest of his post.Fircoal wrote: And now we're jumping on Kwan's typo? Well on this I'm mixed. I don't think his typo means much of anything. I've done typos like that before while town, but I do think his jumping up and seconding his role after it had been safe is noteworthy. I don't think it's that big of a deal but I am still suspcious of him and would like to see him respond. Thusly I'll Unvote. Vote: Kwanton in hopes of getting a response from him.
We've had Antelope for kwanton and Giraffe for Samlen. I think it would help all three of you if you said what animal you are specifically. Otherwise there's a disparity there.DirtyDishSoap wrote:I'll chime in on this. I was given a role but no name. Name of an animal and that's as far as I go with it.

Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
I'm getting the feeling someone (or more) liked 'I Just Can't Wait To Be King' a lil too much:DirtyDishSoap wrote:Ostrich


QFT and here we have a prime example of claiming a no name charactermandalorian2298 wrote: So you are basically asking what EXACTLY should a scummster do in order to reveal that he is scum? Like a number of exact steps that scum should take so that we can lynch him? That we have all agreed on during that big pre-game meeting?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Well fine, I'll give you one: The scumster should claim either a no-name character or someone from the sequals.
madmitch wrote:@Mandy I am just adumb animal who doesn't want to waste time on reading long posts when there is so much more to do ,like grazing and lying around and being part of a family looking out for each other
and on that line of thought i could like to add vote jumping as another scum red flag as illustrated hereSamlen wrote:The whole 'go along with the rest of the herd' sounds a little bit softclaim vanilla townie
madmitch wrote:I voted against Kwanton for his rant against Skoffin.I took that as a personal attack and wondered why the mod didn't do anything as per rule 15,I will change my vote when I see a better choice
madmitch wrote: We should take the chance and we might hit another scum.DDS might be the best vote for now,VOTE DDS
madmitch wrote:VOTE SAM You want to be lynched or have someone lynched so be it.
Dude seriously, you just voted himmadmitch wrote:@ Mandy , why the rush to hang Samlem? What am I not seeing? It has been a while since I watched The Lion King were there giraffes or no giraffes in the movie?
madmitch wrote:Sorry just can't behind the lynch of Samlem, I believe he was just joking about his name being Ed,and I believe his claim because I have basically the same claim.
where are your unvotesmadmitch wrote:I am with Hot Shot, let's see what happens with a few more votes on Kwan, VOTE KWAN
madmitch wrote:then you must be scum VOTE DDS my as well see what happensDirtyDishSoap wrote:Never claimed vanilla. I'm merely saying I am an animal, role not stated. No harm comes from this, and if it clears Sam, I don't see the issue with it.
At this point I don't think it entirely matters, scum can already figure out who is/isn't like Sam simply based on who wanted to lynch him and who of us was against his lynch. yoloHotShot53 wrote:Umm... everyone please stop claiming... if all the vanilla's claim then you're just letting scum know everyone else is a power role to target.

Once you play with mitch a few times, you will realize... that yes, he can be completely random. Often way too much so. But he does seem to be trying to scum hunt so far, and other than his soft claiming he hasn't done too much theme talking... so my guess is that he's town.FloresDelMal wrote:
ok seriously, if this person is not completely random then he or she is running a brilliant disinformation campaign throwing shade virtually all over the place without commiting to develop any attempt to build a real case against anyone, to me his out of nowhere soft claim might have been an strategic hint to his scumsters, like saying "is all right, we will be allright as long as we pose as some harmless hervivore, no one can counterclaim and it doesnt get any more vanilla than that"~ seeing that most named characters on the movie are either omnivorous or carnivorous i could like to FOS all the no name hervivores out there and unvote vote madmitch
in my eyes, after careful re reading and much consideration i think he is the lowest risk kill, because he might be a brilliant scum or a misguided vanilla that contributes pretty much zero, either way i cant see myself mourning his early departure

Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Since Kwan has more votes then DDS, I'm switching my votes (for the reason previously stated). unvote vote Kwantonga7 wrote:Vote Count :
With 15 alive, it takes 8 to lynch!
- Tim (1) Masket
Kwan (4) Hotshot, Mitch, Dakky, Chu
DDS (2) Kwan, Mandy
No lounge (1) Samlen
Fiarlce (2) Tim, skittles
Sam (1) DJ
Mitch (1) Flores

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.