Moderator: Community Team
dakky21 wrote:I do not see a point also. Miss 3 turns = get kicked out = resign. Much easier than clicking the button. And these days, almost no one has 100% attendance.
riskllama wrote:the use of the quitter tag will finally have meaning.
Pirlo wrote:How about a 'Resign Medal' addition?
Let's give medals to the players who use that to encourage people to resign and die.
Or actually, we could give a discount to resigning players with a slogan like "Hey guys, resign and get a discount up to 30% on your point loss. The sooner you resign, the higher discount you get."
Invdr_zim wrote:Pirlo wrote:How about a 'Resign Medal' addition?
Let's give medals to the players who use that to encourage people to resign and die.
Or actually, we could give a discount to resigning players with a slogan like "Hey guys, resign and get a discount up to 30% on your point loss. The sooner you resign, the higher discount you get."
Lmfao
Well this was going to happen sooner or later. My guess is that someone got tired of the constant requests.
I don't know how I feel about it myself, I mean I can see some benefits of avoiding an inevitable loss that drags on for months on end, I can see where it could be abused by multi's, as well as other pros and cons. Well it will be interesting to see how this plays out to say the least.
BoganGod wrote:I'm looking forward to the farming crew finding a way to implement this into their agricultural renaissance methods.
ZornSlayer wrote:My opponent used the button in a speed trench game, and I really liked it. Good courtesy swift and sensible end. Put up the white flag. Why is it 'resign' and not 'surrender?' so it applies equally to those games that are take no prisoners?
IcePack wrote:No it wouldn’t
DJENRE wrote:IcePack wrote:No it wouldn’t
Why?
IcePack wrote:DJENRE wrote:IcePack wrote:No it wouldn’t
Why?
I fundamentally disagree with people quitting the game. It’s one of the worst things that people do. Sitting around a table and someone refuses to continue to play just because they are losing is SUPER annoying.
It ruins the fun of the game and denies the winning person the fun of actually winning the game.
Others disagree and that’s fine, I’ve debated this many times now and they don’t care. If I’m the only person who feels it’s stupid and lame to smack the game board and get up and quit just because you’re losing that’s fine. The day it’s implimented for all games is the day I resign all my active games and leave the site. If I can’t play my games to the end and people can resign without me having input then that’s the day the site no longer becomes fun for me and I will no longer be here for it.
(Some will think that’s great and I’m ok with it, not a threat or anything it’s just a fact. I’m here for clans and fun and imo both would be ruined if this gets expanded to all games)
IcePack wrote:As I said this has been debated multiple times, and it was implimented as mandatory if the one side pushed it and the other side didn’t get to accept because “they shouldn’t determine the other persons parameter for fun either”.
So if it was optional that’s one thing, if I got to refuse it another. There are acceptable compromises but there are people pushing for resign that don’t want to hear those options or discussions and pushed it forward anyway
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users