Moderator: Community Team

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Well, the other people are skoffin (mute), you, pika (only does what he wants) and mitch. You not voting mitch is like a self-fulfilling prophesy. Obviously no "new blood" (by that I mean other voters) won't vote mitch because none can/care. Besides, your point doesn't prove that mitch isn't scum. I remember you said at some point that mitch and thor voting each other doesn't mean only one of them has to be scum. We need all four of us (because we can't expect pika to act normally) to vote the same person. Rag won't vote dakky (and I'm not a fan either). I could switch to Skoffin, but I don't think it's gonna make the consensus easier to reachmandalorian2298 wrote:@Zabeast
The fact that
A) the three people who are currently voting Mitch and not Dakky are
B) THE EXACTLY SAME THREE PLAYERS who, on Day 2, were voting Mitch and not Thorth,
underlines just how right I am. Again.
1) I would be fascinated to hear how that hypothetical info would pan out or, rather, how it would add to the info that we already on those same people based on the fact that they were voting Mitch instead of Thorth on Day 2.ZaBeast wrote:Well, the other people are skoffin (mute), you, pika (only does what he wants) and mitch. You not voting mitch is like a self-fulfilling prophesy. Obviously no "new blood" (by that I mean other voters) won't vote mitch because none can/care. Besides, your point doesn't prove that mitch isn't scum. I remember you said at some point that mitch and thor voting each other doesn't mean only one of them has to be scum. We need all four of us (because we can't expect pika to act normally) to vote the same person. Rag won't vote dakky (and I'm not a fan either). I could switch to Skoffin, but I don't think it's gonna make the consensus easier to reachmandalorian2298 wrote:@Zabeast
The fact that
A) the three people who are currently voting Mitch and not Dakky are
B) THE EXACTLY SAME THREE PLAYERS who, on Day 2, were voting Mitch and not Thorth,
underlines just how right I am. Again.
Besides, even if you don't think mitch is scum, lynching him
1) can give us info about the alignment of the persons voting him. At this stage, we can afford a mislynch, esp. if it's a VT's
2) gives our town cop one less person to investigate
3) proves you right. You like to be proven right, right?![]()
I wonder if you have the same reason as me for thinking mitch's role claim is believable (and that's why you believe I'm not scum either). Doesn't make his actions less questionable though.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
This is kinda of a soft claim. If you have the "power piece" like Bishop which is powerless and just VT (could be the reason why you believe Mitch), if you believe Mandy is also the VT with a role name (except a Pawn), then we shouldn't vote Mitch, but all others who are not confirmed as town or VT. That leaves Skoffin and I guess we should lynch her?ZaBeast wrote: I wonder if you have the same reason as me for thinking mitch's role claim is believable (and that's why you believe I'm not scum either). Doesn't make his actions less questionable though.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
What if my win condition is to be lynched three times though!ZaBeast wrote:I'd rather wait on pika just he case he decides to be helpful for once, but if we agree to disagree, in the spirit of saving time, I'd rather lynch him again so we don't have to go through the whole deadline thing again.
In the spirit of saving even more time, you and Ragian can switch to voting dakky.ZaBeast wrote:I'd rather wait on pika just he case he decides to be helpful for once, but if we agree to disagree, in the spirit of saving time, I'd rather lynch him again so we don't have to go through the whole deadline thing again.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
I voted him on page 24 but no one else seemed to care and take my points into consideration and I don't want another "no lynch" or "vote pika".Ragian wrote:Why not vote Mandy then?
Actually, if dakky is Town, then I'll have to reevaluate my position about all players (except for the Divine Pika, who is a creature beyond my ken).ZaBeast wrote:Well, least we won't be hung up on this forever. A doc is not very helpful if he only protects himself anyways. I'm curious whether he was bluffing when he said he wouldn't protect rag during the night though.
Mandy, gonna single out on someone else tomorrow (if the game doesn't end) or are there chances we'll not be stuck in a "lynch whoever mandy wants to lynch or no-lynch" scenario again?

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
Skoff was always my first option after dakky and the last two days suggest that her muteness might have been imagined. I'll reread once more before hammerringZaBeast wrote:Aww, poor pika, Ragian is dead (unless that still fulfills your wincon)
Wow, short day (it's a good thing though, since I'd rather have the game end before I leave for the holidays)
Going back to skoff this time Vote Skoffin I guess we'll know soon enough if she's still "muted"
Not much more arguments than last time, except I'm still not convinced mitch is scum, so it has to be skoff, and I don't believe someone would conveniently mute her 3 turns in a row. And if the muting power is a scum one, why not mute someone more important, like a cop for instance? My take on it is she probably had a 1-shot muting ability that she used on herself on D2 and now she's stuck pretending to be mute because she can't mute anybody else.
Also, since we don't know if pika has other targets to lynch, can a person wanting to vote someone that has already one vote only state so instead of actually placing a vote, to prevent a quickhammer from pika? Except skoff, I'm perfectly fine with her being hammeredAlternatively, maybe the second vote could be unofficial (underlined instead of bolded for instance)
fp'ed by pika
Since he voted skoff already it's fine having her at L-1

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.