Moderator: Community Team
IcePack wrote:What’s to stop someone from playing the minimum 25 and then stopping w impossibly high win %?
xroads wrote:I really really like this, but it will never ever happen.
betiko wrote:IcePack wrote:What’s to stop someone from playing the minimum 25 and then stopping w impossibly high win %?
It would reset the next year?
How would your win rate work? Would the number of opponent be taken into consideration?
Like if you have 20% win rate in 5 player games it's like having a 50% on 1vs1?
xroads wrote:xroads wrote:I really really like this, but it will never ever happen.
see what I mean?
mrswdk wrote:i.e. you want to increase the amount of medals that are available for nothing other than being able to win a lot of games, and for people who are good at farming obscure maps to be given medals for farming obscure maps
It's already hard enough to find games on normal maps, without actively encouraging all the medal nerds to retreat into 1v1 polymorphic Krazy Kingdoms games never to emerge again.
xroads wrote:Because nothing suggested ever gets implemented, no matter how good the idea is.
xroads wrote:The resign button has been begged for for as long as CC has been around, and it FINALLY happens on trench games only.
How about the other 500 decent suggestions that never see the light of day.
xroads wrote:When was the last suggestion from this forum actually implemented? Link to original thread.
Sorry to be a Debbie downer, but I am resigned to the facts. There is a saying, when you stop innovating your product, you start dying. I think the results speak for themselves.
CatchersMitt14 wrote:I think the actuality of this getting implemented will really come down to how the criteria structures works for this medal. We will not be getting any new medals added in the current medal system that are not issued manually. Wham said he has to overhaul the engineering of the medal structure before he will add any more medals as in their current state it's a large amount of precessing and creating a drain on performance. I have not had any indication from him that he plans to do that in the foreseeable future as I have recently tried to add a new medal.
xroads wrote:CatchersMitt14 wrote:I think the actuality of this getting implemented will really come down to how the criteria structures works for this medal. We will not be getting any new medals added in the current medal system that are not issued manually. Wham said he has to overhaul the engineering of the medal structure before he will add any more medals as in their current state it's a large amount of precessing and creating a drain on performance. I have not had any indication from him that he plans to do that in the foreseeable future as I have recently tried to add a new medal.
Quote "I really really like this, but it will never ever happen"
IcePack wrote:xroads wrote:CatchersMitt14 wrote:I think the actuality of this getting implemented will really come down to how the criteria structures works for this medal. We will not be getting any new medals added in the current medal system that are not issued manually. Wham said he has to overhaul the engineering of the medal structure before he will add any more medals as in their current state it's a large amount of precessing and creating a drain on performance. I have not had any indication from him that he plans to do that in the foreseeable future as I have recently tried to add a new medal.
Quote "I really really like this, but it will never ever happen"
Adding a new medal is one option, utilizing existing medals is another. Hence the whole determining / working out the details on a suggestion and criteria, in order for suggestion(s) to be considered and implimented. This is why many of the existing suggestions typically fall short / fail.
This suggestion could potentially work within the existing medal structure and those details would have to get worked out.
nietzsche wrote:for this you would need a 250 x 6000 array to just consider active users (800,000 for total users), and then calculate the retroactive score of every player on every map.. can't think of another way to do it..
if they didn't even do it for the range field on our profiles, and that was 1 score.. not 250. doubt it.
and then you would need to check the top score on each map every hour or so?
not gonna happen.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users