Moderator: Community Team
So you know what happened?riskllama wrote:he has only himself to blame.
We could have a new sub-forum - "The Guest Book"shoop76 wrote: Would be nice if cc announced a player is guested and what they have done.
iAmCaffeine wrote:
If I was a troll I'd expect to be treated like one.

Razorvich wrote:High Score: 2569
TeeGee has my PW... Wall him if I get below 1 Hour in CLAN GAMES ONLY !!


Someone told me that Caff had been given a 3 day forum ban, which includes chats and pm's etc. As far as I'm aware you can still chat in games.betiko wrote:Ok so livechat and global chat stuff. I don't read any of them. So he only got guested from forums mot from games?
I wonder if you can speak in gamechat

This. Chat bans are for Live chat and Global Only. Doesn't affect Game Chat in games.Keefie wrote:Someone told me that Caff had been given a 3 day forum ban, which includes chats and pm's etc. As far as I'm aware you can still chat in games.betiko wrote:Ok so livechat and global chat stuff. I don't read any of them. So he only got guested from forums mot from games?
I wonder if you can speak in gamechat
K
I never had any warning before I was banned so you can stop talking bullshit right now.Razorvich wrote:Look it is real simple.
There are some topics which include trolls/baits/stupid shit between people.. that the Moderation Team, when bought to their attention are going to ask you to either drop, not discuss, have any contact ect ect.
When someone blatantly does not comply with these directions, then bummer for you.. the hammer comes down.

I would expect that response from a child. When my kids were younger sometimes the smack up side the head was the warning.iAmCaffeine wrote:I never had any warning before I was banned so you can stop talking bullshit right now.Razorvich wrote:Look it is real simple.
There are some topics which include trolls/baits/stupid shit between people.. that the Moderation Team, when bought to their attention are going to ask you to either drop, not discuss, have any contact ect ect.
When someone blatantly does not comply with these directions, then bummer for you.. the hammer comes down.

The fact is Razor is saying I was given a warning to stop with my posts, and that I ignored the warning and continued and therefore deserved my ban. The truth is that I never received a warning so he's spreading lies.Evil Semp wrote:I would expect that response from a child. When my kids were younger sometimes the smack up side the head was the warning.iAmCaffeine wrote:I never had any warning before I was banned so you can stop talking bullshit right now.Razorvich wrote:Look it is real simple.
There are some topics which include trolls/baits/stupid shit between people.. that the Moderation Team, when bought to their attention are going to ask you to either drop, not discuss, have any contact ect ect.
When someone blatantly does not comply with these directions, then bummer for you.. the hammer comes down.


I'm not talking about what the rules are, I'm just saying Razor's statement is not true.riskllama wrote:pretty sure I recall one of the forum mods saying a warning was a "courtesy" & not a requirement on their end. anyways, welcome back...

Is a "warning" needed for every single forum post or every single sentence said in chat?iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm not talking about what the rules are, I'm just saying Razor's statement is not true.riskllama wrote:pretty sure I recall one of the forum mods saying a warning was a "courtesy" & not a requirement on their end. anyways, welcome back...
You know where the line in the sand is. Do we really need to tell you not to trip over that line all the time? Just step back a little and you will quit tripping over the line.iAmCaffeine wrote:The fact is Razor is saying I was given a warning to stop with my posts, and that I ignored the warning and continued and therefore deserved my ban. The truth is that I never received a warning so he's spreading lies.Evil Semp wrote:I would expect that response from a child. When my kids were younger sometimes the smack up side the head was the warning.iAmCaffeine wrote:I never had any warning before I was banned so you can stop talking bullshit right now.Razorvich wrote:Look it is real simple.
There are some topics which include trolls/baits/stupid shit between people.. that the Moderation Team, when bought to their attention are going to ask you to either drop, not discuss, have any contact ect ect.
When someone blatantly does not comply with these directions, then bummer for you.. the hammer comes down.

Jdsizzleslice wrote:Is a "warning" needed for every single forum post or every single sentence said in chat?iAmCaffeine wrote:I'm not talking about what the rules are, I'm just saying Razor's statement is not true.riskllama wrote:pretty sure I recall one of the forum mods saying a warning was a "courtesy" & not a requirement on their end. anyways, welcome back...
Can you both learn to read? I have not said at any point I should've been given a warning prior to the ban. Nor have I said I didn't deserve the ban. All I am saying is that Razor's information is false. That's it. Holy f*ck.Evil Semp wrote:You know where the line in the sand is. Do we really need to tell you not to trip over that line all the time? Just step back a little and you will quit tripping over the line.iAmCaffeine wrote:The fact is Razor is saying I was given a warning to stop with my posts, and that I ignored the warning and continued and therefore deserved my ban. The truth is that I never received a warning so he's spreading lies.Evil Semp wrote:I would expect that response from a child. When my kids were younger sometimes the smack up side the head was the warning.iAmCaffeine wrote:I never had any warning before I was banned so you can stop talking bullshit right now.Razorvich wrote:Look it is real simple.
There are some topics which include trolls/baits/stupid shit between people.. that the Moderation Team, when bought to their attention are going to ask you to either drop, not discuss, have any contact ect ect.
When someone blatantly does not comply with these directions, then bummer for you.. the hammer comes down.

Do some posts require immediate action, or do all posts require a warning, regardless of content?iAmCaffeine wrote:Can you both learn to read? I have not said at any point I should've been given a warning prior to the ban. Nor have I said I didn't deserve the ban. All I am saying is that Razor's information is false. That's it. Holy f*ck.

This isn't about that all. This is how quickly politics devolve into idiocy. The "line in the sand" becomes us vs. them. It doesn't matter what IAC says, it must be wrong because he isn't in the ingroup. He is from the wrong tribe.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Do some posts require immediate action, or do all posts require a warning, regardless of content?iAmCaffeine wrote:Can you both learn to read? I have not said at any point I should've been given a warning prior to the ban. Nor have I said I didn't deserve the ban. All I am saying is that Razor's information is false. That's it. Holy f*ck.
If it was us vs. them than he wouldn't be able to post at all. Caffie has received several friendly warnings from me in the past, many members have.DoomYoshi wrote:This isn't about that all. This is how quickly politics devolve into idiocy. The "line in the sand" becomes us vs. them. It doesn't matter what IAC says, it must be wrong because he isn't in the ingroup. He is from the wrong tribe. Just imagine he was a Republican and you have all of American politics since Woodrow "legitimate nazi supporter" Wilson.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Do some posts require immediate action, or do all posts require a warning, regardless of content?iAmCaffeine wrote:Can you both learn to read? I have not said at any point I should've been given a warning prior to the ban. Nor have I said I didn't deserve the ban. All I am saying is that Razor's information is false. That's it. Holy f*ck.


