reptile wrote:and just cause you LG players cant count i will do it for you!
CC: 8 LG:5 on your profile stupid you have played 13 games and only won 5. so i dont know if i even want to waste my time with you anymore. lol. you said you won both games.... wut? either way i will shut you up if you will ever shut up.
Reptile, those are all six player standard. Look at the best only six person standard players on Conquer Club they all have w/l records in the 30's. So that is wrong. Also, as for the people who say Landgrab players can't play over at CC, that is wrong. I played at landgrab most of my online risk playing time and got all the way up to 37 on the scoreboard before I stopped concentrating on CC so much and went on a losing streak about the time I got really into tribal wars.
Also for how brosebear is embarrassing Landgrab, just remember, every site has their hendy. It's the same sort of thing, as for the person who posted the classic map on Landgrab to prove maps are ugly I believe you are wrong. I believe that Classic is one of the only maps that is better on landgrab than CC that they have in common, because CC's is so horribly ugly and cluttered. Also, Landgrab has more map options some of which that are really pretty, but they leave it up to users to decide which maps they want to play which makes it ideal to people with different map styles other than ones who like to play 30 some maps that look all the same.
Basically, in my opinion, CC is equal to Landgrab. Each site offers different trade offs. CC is too uniform in my opinion as opposed to landgrab that has so many options and different combinations of games that you can play, while CC has much better graphics and a bigger community/forums. I don't see why we can't all just stop fighting and be friends and mutually hate Grand Strategy.
