Moderator: Community Team
Yes and no the problem is that I feel that he's a power role or scum. So it can also be bad to push him.Ragian wrote:@dgz, do you feel most comfortable about blacky being bad?

He's scum mate could be anyone but I feel that If he flips scum then strike is townRagian wrote:Here's the thing. Experienced players (perhaps except for dakky) know that you shouldn't claim without being pushed, so him not agreeing with claims doesn't mean (like jmf thinks) that he is something different. It just means that he knows to keep his role to himself in order for scum not to have an easier day killing off power roles.
Let's say that we lynch blacky and he turns scum/town. Who would you say would be scum/town based on blacky's flip?
Please point me to where I was discussing flavour and using it to point to scumminess?strike wolf wrote:@Blacky. You weren't exactly disengaged from the flavor yourself. Most of your wanting it to go away seems to come up when you're in the spot light.
I am fine with this, so long as others agree...dgz345 wrote:You don't seem so sure yourself I am very sure of myself... just not willing to tell you who I am at this point.blacky365 wrote:
Exactly... u are assuming i have a power role or scum because i asked the question... perhaps i am also a vt and was surprised at the number of vt's already claimed.
And if we are to belive dakky and tobi and including myself being VT
That leaves 6 persons who's alive that has not claimed vt.
And in a regular mafia game I would say there is a cop and a doctor. And maybe 2-3 scum
Exactly, this is why I asked the question, I dont have the experience to know how many VT's would be normal
That would give you a kinda high chance for being power role or scum.
It feels like you over justified your vote on me
I rather have you at L-2 right now to learn more.
VOTE blacky



Address me via the proper channel (i.e. this thread) or face the consequences. Also, feel free to respond to any of my recent posts.dakky21 wrote:pika post in skoff game or face consequences
The thing that strikes me about dgz345 is how well the consistency of the posts correlates with their subject matter. Every time dgz345 speaks about another player there is a contradiction or confusion somewhere, but look at the other posts and it is not only consistent but bread-crumbed (I took that post in particular as a joke which didn't land at the time, but the explanation given for it since seems more plausible). I cannot see somebody playing so sloppily in general while being so consistent about their own claims if those claims are not the truth.Ragian wrote:I would like to hear Pika's thoughts on the current development. And jmf's thoughts, too.
However, posts like the following come across as entirely genuine to me:dgz345 wrote:and im not sure about ragian.
He has a way hes playing "good guy" scum
My gut is saying that ragian is trying to "protect" me cause he knows im not scum. and therefor sound more townie if i would get lynched.
BUT thats just my gut right now.
Ragian wrote:This is ridiculous. No one is saying anything, and no one is doing anything. The stalemate plays into scum hands.
The reason for this is that I'm no mafia veteran. I can't really "read" others so it's mostly on gut feelings. But the facts about me I know. So that's why I can be consistent with the information about me. Because of facts. But I don't have facts about the other players.Pikanchion wrote: The thing that strikes me about dgz345 is how well the consistency of the posts correlates with their subject matter. Every time dgz345 speaks about another player there is a contradiction or confusion somewhere, but look at the other posts and it is not only consistent but bread-crumbed (I took that post in particular as a joke which didn't land at the time, but the explanation given for it since seems more plausible). I cannot see somebody playing so sloppily in general while being so consistent about their own claims if those claims are not the truth.



That is a misrepresentation of my reasoning.Ragian wrote:@Pika, so your point is that dgz plays sloppily (or poorly or whatever), which makes him town, and yet you have been insisting on lynching others for poor play. What gives?
When I do that I do it for a reason, as I've shown the only time I was actually questioned about why I asked one of these questions... That last line in particular could be interpreted as you not wanting to play on the opposite team as me because you accept it as an effective method ;)Tobikera wrote:I'm leaning town on Ragian and am leaning scum on pika. Pika could have what appears to be one of the few power roles for town, and he's protecting that. But, then again, he always acts that way, not sharing, but rather demanding specific info from others. If I was ever scum, I would vote to night kill him out of hand, just on principle.
That's a direct contradiction to what dgz345 has claimed though, why do you think this and why are you not then certain that dgz345 is scum for lying about it?jfm10 wrote:Weekend starts tomorrow for me but for now DGZ is not VT but could be townie.I am abit skeptic on keeping him around cause in my opinion he messes with roles which could hurt town.
dgz345 wrote:And if we are to belive dakky and tobi and including myself being VT
That leaves 6 persons who's alive that has not claimed vt.

Pikanchion wrote: The thing that strikes me about dgz345 is how well the consistency of the posts correlates with their subject matter. Every time dgz345 speaks about another player there is a contradiction or confusion somewhere, but look at the other posts and it is not only consistent but bread-crumbed (I took that post in particular as a joke which didn't land at the time, but the explanation given for it since seems more plausible). I cannot see somebody playing so sloppily in general while being so consistent about their own claims if those claims are not the truth.
So you believe the flavor about his role is correct based on him being consistent about it. Fine, but I don't see how that makes him not scummy. In the second one you say the fact he's been inconsistent when speaking about other people and the fact he's been consistent when talking about his role makes it clear that he's not trying to lie but is just lazy, which is the part of your argument I just don't get. Are you saying he's playing scummily because he's not putting as much effort in the game as he should be (which I think would be scummy), that he looks scummy but isn't necessarily, or that his play somehow makes him town?Pikanchion wrote:*Regardless of whether one adheres to lynch all liars or not, lying requires intent, and I think the change in consistency between subjects is evidence that this is not a result of intent but laziness.
You could say that all the claimed VTs have a 100% chance of being VT or scum though. How is blacky maybe being a PR a reason to try to get him lynched?dgz345 wrote:And if we are to belive dakky and tobi and including myself being VT
That leaves 6 persons who's alive that has not claimed vt.
And in a regular mafia game I would say there is a cop and a doctor. And maybe 2-3 scum
That would give you a kinda high chance for being power role or scum.
Where would Ragian place in the first set of town reads?Tobikera wrote:I feel town thoughts toward jfm, dakky, and dgz, in that order. But, I've been fooled before.
I'm leaning town on Ragian and am leaning scum on pika. Pika could have what appears to be one of the few power roles for town, and he's protecting that. But, then again, he always acts that way, not sharing, but rather demanding specific info from others. If I was ever scum, I would vote to night kill him out of hand, just on principle.

So, then, by that logic, dakky is our scum partner too?jfm10 wrote:Dakky is my sibling,that i am positive.The more I ponder on DGZ the more he appears to be the best choice.I am getting the impression that ragian and DGZ could be the scum the way ragian went after him and then jumps off the vote.
unvote
vote DGZ
dakky21 wrote:while flavor is not intended to make a difference I still think DGZ is town. His role name (while still flavor) is too similar to mine or Razors... aage's name was a bit different but that explains it all, role name is just flavor. Nothing important. But I find DGZ play as townish and he is now again on L-1 so I will
unvote

Why am I not VT?jfm10 wrote:Weekend starts tomorrow for me but for now DGZ is not VT but could be townie.I am abit skeptic on keeping him around cause in my opinion he messes with roles which could hurt town.