Moderator: Community Team


Ray Rider wrote:Soo, anyone else enjoying watching Canada's comedian in chief?
![]()
![]()
It's been a while! Seems pretty slow here in off-topics compared to the good ol' days!DoomYoshi wrote:A Wild Ray Rider appears!


It is, but you can help change that...Ray Rider wrote:It's been a while! Seems pretty slow here in off-topics compared to the good ol' days!DoomYoshi wrote:A Wild Ray Rider appears!
If the Soda Pop industry was to go extinct, I wouldn't cry for them. Would be good for our health as well as the environment. However, I don't think they will. There are tons of options beyond single-use plastic -- metal, glass, and multi-use plastics.NomadPatriot wrote:so if California, The EU & Canada ban 'Single Use plastics"... what happens to the Soda Pop industry in those areas...?
if the point of ending plastics is to save the environment... glass , metal or paper are not good options either..Dukasaur wrote:There are tons of options beyond single-use plastic -- metal, glass, and multi-use plastics.
NomadPatriot wrote:if the point of ending plastics is to save the environment... glass , metal or paper are not good options either..Dukasaur wrote:There are tons of options beyond single-use plastic -- metal, glass, and multi-use plastics.
Glass:
Glass has to be melted in a furnace & molded.. which would require a massive amount of energy... also it would have to be very thick glass in order to keep it from breaking. Shipping weights would soar.. requiring even more energy.. both of those details would cause a massive amount of pollution..
Metal:
metal would also require a furnace to melt & mold.. requiring massive energy requirements.. also in order to keep up with demand at current world population levels.. more mining operations would have to pop up.. destroying more of the environment.
paper:
the shear amount of trees that would have to be cut down in order to produce a sustainable substitute for plastics would not be feasible.. trees do not grow fast enough.. also.. it would require massive deforestation.. destroying the very things that breathe the CO2 everyone is scared of.
re-fillable customer owned items:
in order to even think about implementing this policy. the customer owned refillables would never pass FDA guidelines & companies would be getting sued every minute over people getting sick because their re-fillable wasn't sterilized or properly up to safe clean item levels required for food.. the average customer would have to take food safety courses on proper food handling & be forced to sign a waiver that they are purchasing the food ' at their own risk'..
because who would you blame for say a E.coli poisoning incident.. which 1 was tainted, -->was it the food served at the grocery or was it the customers re-fillable .. ?
good luck with that..
in order to be able to use Paper as a substitute for plastics.. it would have to be wax coated.. ( unless you are actually wanting to coat it in plastic, which defeats the purpose entirely)..Bernie Sanders wrote:Recycling paper does not threaten trees.
--> but I see you still cannot keep sex off your mind Pedo-Sanders..Bernie Sanders wrote:ass.... ass. Fukn !