Moderator: Community Team
aage wrote:On a different note, do you have a risk related PR or are you just enjoying yourself?
LSU Tiger Josh wrote: With two deaths on N1 that is not a good start to town especially with one of them being the cop.
Ragian wrote:So...what do the voters on skoffin try to accomplish?
There's something fishy about LSU. Just saying...
Ragian wrote:So...what do the voters on skoffin try to accomplish?
There's something fishy about LSU. Just saying...
I would very much have liked to have vig killed Dakky, but alas it wasn't me.dgz345 wrote:Well now IXS has a reason to join next game I guess.
And as said above. Looks like both got killed. The question is which was mafia kill? And is it a serial killer or a vigilante that really REALLY hates dakky?
Who would play with Dakkys feelings and kill him first every game?
Ragian wrote:So...what do the voters on skoffin try to accomplish?
There's something fishy about LSU. Just saying...
Ragian wrote:@deg, attacking is not equal to voting. I prefer to let people talk (or have the chance to at least) before I make up my mind/vote. You trigger happy?
My post restriction is essentially to add some risk-based flavor. I'm trying to live up to the spirit of it, but it shouldn't change the odds.degaston wrote:You can't win the game if you don't attack at some point.
Ragian wrote:@deg, what do you want said about skoffin? She's not participating. How to comment on something there's not there? She could be town, scum, or serial killer. There's no way of knowing. Voting for he is stabbing in the dark. If you don't like the way I'm playing, I think you should vote for me instead of voting for someone who's not around.
LSU, however, has now had a fair few chances to say something and has opted no to. Instead, he is pointing his finger at skoffin for not participating. Feels like the pot.
vote LSU
Ragian wrote:Any funny stuff to report? LSU?
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:As far as any information given out last night I do not have anything to state that would be helpful at this point.
I guess what I want said about skoffin is why you had no comment regarding the two votes on her, but chose to comment on LSU. You said you were trying to get LSU to participate, but at that time he had posted more recently than skoffin, and has posted again since then, while skoffin hasn't posted since Monday. Either one could be town, scum or SK, and it's always a stab in the dark unless someone gets additional info or they say something really scummy, so that's not saying anything.Ragian wrote:@deg, what do you want said about skoffin? She's not participating. How to comment on something there's not there? She could be town, scum, or serial killer. There's no way of knowing. Voting for he is stabbing in the dark.
Here again, you make a comment about LSU, but when you're asked about it, instead of answering the question you accuse dgz of fishing. Well, if he was fishing, then how is that different from what you were doing?Ragian wrote:Why are you trying to fish for information that is not there?dgz345 wrote:Can I take this as you visited LSU?Ragian wrote:Any funny stuff to report? LSU?
Or why LSU?
I wasn't complaining about the way you're playing - I have more complaints about people who don't contribute.Ragian wrote:If you don't like the way I'm playing, I think you should vote for me instead of voting for someone who's not around.
Ragian wrote:@LSU, I saw your answer. Dgz said you ignored me. I just think you're lying
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Yes, you are. When I make this argument it's almost always made on cases against players who are either known to be inactive or simply unknown/new players. Skoffin has played here for ages, she's the forum mod for f*ck's sake. We can very reasonably expect her to participate. She even posted two lines at the start of the day, so she is certainly aware the game is ongoing. In this case it is certainly warranted to vote her for not contributing, imo, and I actually would argue it's alignment indicative. I happen to know she isn't too busy to post. She knows the day has started, why would she do nothing as town?Ragian wrote:Now, aage has started to rub me the wrong way, too. I can't be arsed to find the game, but I'm confident that I've been scolded for voting inactives or barely actives in the past by aage because it's a blind lynch that usually would benefit scum. Am I wrong, aage?
Ragian wrote:Aage is waaaay too quiet for a player of his capacity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users