Kevi wrote:
Yes - and it's not the best way to win a game - it's sort of an empty feeling - that I didn't deserve to win that game - that someone else should have won,
How would it feel if I joined all af your multi-player games and every time you were set to win I suicided into you and gave the game to a cook?
I could make that cook a captain and you would no longer be a colonel - I could make you a bus boy within a month and a bog cleaner by the end of it. Would that be OK? - would you still renew your your premium? - What would be the point of even playing?
That isn't what your complaint is about. If you had said "so and so is ruining every single game I'm in, I would say hell yes, get 'em, that's bs and a pattern of abuse.
But you're complaining about how someone played a single game, a game in which you lost because said player chose to attack you, which, while it sucks and maybe made no sense, should be within the rights of a player to do, however dumb or ill advised. Is this bad etiquette and being a bit if a dick? Sure. And I'm sure the admin will side with you so ignore my useless rant.
When you won those games because someone else was suicided, did you file a complaint then? No? You just felt bad and moved on? So you only file a complaint for someone ruining a game when it negatively impacts you? So much for taking a stand, I guess. Nothing personal and I know when it comes to this, I'm somehow in the minority but it drives me nuts when people want to legislate how and when and why other players can make moves, attacks, etc in games just because it didn't work out for them in that one instance but on the occasions it does work in their favor, they take the win and say thank you. A bit disingenuous if you ask me.