Moderator: Community Team
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewt ... 8&t=234058Jdsizzleslice wrote:Notice how there was also no outcry from the MSM after the DOJ found that Yale University ACTUALLY was discriminating against several ethnicities? That's because this did not fit their narrative.
I think this whole thing pretty much proves BLM's point.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Been silent for the past few days now. MSM coverage of Cannon Hinnant is disgusting. They only covered the story after they received extreme backlash. However...
Honestly, I think the MSM honestly just don't care about anything OTHER than any situation that will benefit their narrative.
- Where is the cry for racism here?
- Where is the cry for justice from BLM or Antifa?
- Where is the cry for justice from the MSM?
- Why are there no riots in North Carolina (or anywhere for that matter) right now?
Sick, dishonest, and uncaring. We see this all the time. Notice how there was also no outcry from the MSM after the DOJ found that Yale University ACTUALLY was discriminating against several ethnicities? That's because this did not fit their narrative.
Quite the contrary.Dukasaur wrote:I think this whole thing pretty much proves BLM's point.
Correct, with a huge stipulation. Hundreds of blacks are slaughtered every year by other blacks.Dukasaur wrote:Hundreds of blacks slaughtered every year.
Correct, with a huge stipulation. The politicians in the areas with these high murder rates don't care, and haven't for years. My question is are you attributing "nobody" to "everyone"?Dukasaur wrote:Nobody could care less.
Incorrect. There has been no outcry for this kid's murder. The MSM has not gone "ballistic." (Side-note, this is an amazing out of context quote, lolDukasaur wrote:One white kid is murdered, everybody goes ballistic.
If there is a situation to this one (in which a 5 year old kid was shot in the head) then I will look at the story and condemn just like this one. Race has nothing to do with whether or not someone's actions are justifiable.Dukasaur wrote:Where was your concern last time some 6-year old black kid was murdered?
Was Cannon murdered by a police officer supposedly performing his duties?All I am asking for here is equal MSM outrage for Cannon as was presented for George.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:Been silent for the past few days now. MSM coverage of Cannon Hinnant is disgusting. They only covered the story after they received extreme backlash. However...
Honestly, I think the MSM honestly just don't care about anything OTHER than any situation that will benefit their narrative.
- Where is the cry for racism here?
- Where is the cry for justice from BLM or Antifa?
- Where is the cry for justice from the MSM?
- Why are there no riots in North Carolina (or anywhere for that matter) right now?
Sick, dishonest, and uncaring. We see this all the time. Notice how there was also no outcry from the MSM after the DOJ found that Yale University ACTUALLY was discriminating against several ethnicities? That's because this did not fit their narrative.
I would not assume both acts to be just as bad on the moral scale. All murder is wrong, unquestionably, but someone who kills in a moment of blind rage as not as culpable as someone who has all the time in the world to reconsider his actions and decides to go ahead anyway.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Quite the contrary.Dukasaur wrote:I think this whole thing pretty much proves BLM's point.
The kid was white, the suspect was black. There is no evidence of racism here (unless the suspect reveals it was racially motivated). No outcry.
We look at George Floyd's where he was black and the officer was white. There is no evidence that the kneeling on the neck was racism (unless the officer reveals it was racially motivated). Riots.
If both acts are assumed or alleged to be just as bad on the moral scale, where are the riots for the kid who died? The reason why there are none is because the kid's death doesn't fit the MSM's narrative. It's a damn shame when people are used for a political agenda.
I'll let this writer at the Milwaukee Independent answer that one:Jdsizzleslice wrote:Correct, with a huge stipulation. Hundreds of blacks are slaughtered every year by other blacks.Dukasaur wrote:Hundreds of blacks slaughtered every year.
According to 2018 data, when race of offenders and victims are known, (which is in just 45.7 percent of murders), 81 percent of whites are listed as killed by other whites, 15.5 percent of whites are listed as killed by blacks, 88.9 percent of blacks are listed as killed by other blacks and 8 percent of blacks are listed as killed by whites.
Most people are unaware of these statistics. As a result, they yell and scream that black people need to stop killing other black people with out ever once saying white people need to stop killing other white people. I hear many consistently say that unless we stop killing each other, we should not complain about the police killing black people. People of all racial groups tend to kill people who look like them.
The police on the other hand, kill blacks disproportionately. Data from 2013-2019 shows that Black Americans are 2.5 times as likely as White Americans to be shot and killed by police officers. In Wisconsin, Blacks are 6.32 % of residents but accounted for 24% of those killed by police according to Mapping Police Violence.
Between 2013 and 2019, police in the United States killed 7,666 people. Black people have been 28% of those killed by police since 2013 despite being only 13% of the population. Of those 7,666 killed by police over 1,000 were unarmed and 17.3% of the black people who died as a result of police interactions were unarmed, a rate higher than for Whites (13.3%), and Hispanics (15.5%).
LOL, I see you're working up the the traditional "blame the Democratic mayors" dodge that Republicans like to trot out. Since the causes of the violence are almost all Federal policies, there's sweet f*ck all the Democratic mayors can do about them, except be scapegoated for your campaigns.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Correct, with a huge stipulation. The politicians in the areas with these high murder rates don't care, and haven't for years.Dukasaur wrote:Nobody could care less.
I wasn't talking about the MSM, I was talking about you.Jdsizzleslice wrote: My question is are you attributing "nobody" to "everyone"?
Incorrect. There has been no outcry for this kid's murder. The MSM has not gone "ballistic." (Side-note, this is an amazing out of context quote, lolDukasaur wrote:One white kid is murdered, everybody goes ballistic.)
If there is a situation to this one (in which a 5 year old kid was shot in the head) then I will look at the story and condemn just like this one. Race has nothing to do with whether or not someone's actions are justifiable.Dukasaur wrote:Where was your concern last time some 6-year old black kid was murdered?
True, but,,,aAccording to the FBI. of the 2925 black people murdered in 2018, 2600 were killed by other blacks. On the other hand, of the 3315 white people murdered, 2677 were murdered by other white people. Where is the fuss about white on white murders?Correct, with a huge stipulation. Hundreds of blacks are slaughtered every year by other blacks.
What is this obsession with Obama in this Forum?mrswdk wrote:Nest thing you know Obama will probably find out that little boy’s killer wrote a rap and invite him to visit the White House.
How many whites were killed by blacks out of curiosity? from watching Fox news I would have thought whites were only killed by illegal immigrants from Central America????jonesthecurl wrote:True, but,,,aAccording to the FBI. of the 2925 black people murdered in 2018, 2600 were killed by other blacks. On the other hand, of the 3315 white people murdered, 2677 were murdered by other white people. Where is the fuss about white on white murders?Correct, with a huge stipulation. Hundreds of blacks are slaughtered every year by other blacks.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
I've always been curious how mixed race people factor in to these numbers... is it like the one drop rule for being labeled as black by the FBI? If you are half white half black and you kill someone is it like a 1/2 point for each?jonesthecurl wrote:514, and 234 vice-versa.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
Was George shot in the head whilst riding his bike in a neighbors yard?jonesthecurl wrote:Was Cannon murdered by a police officer supposedly performing his duties?
Ergo, corruption.jimboston wrote:MSM only has a narrative as far as it promotes their financial interests.
So, in your eyes, blind rage with intent is better than killing slowly over time with no intent?Dukasaur wrote:I would not assume both acts to be just as bad on the moral scale. All murder is wrong, unquestionably, but someone who kills in a moment of blind rage as not as culpable as someone who has all the time in the world to reconsider his actions and decides to go ahead anyway.
Thank you for proving my point that 99% of black people are not targets of racist killings.Dukasaur wrote:I'll let this writer at the Milwaukee Independent answer that one
Did I say Democrat?Dukasaur wrote:LOL, I see you're working up the the traditional "blame the Democratic mayors" dodge that Republicans like to trot out. Since the causes of the violence are almost all Federal policies, there's sweet f*ck all the Democratic mayors can do about them, except be scapegoated for your campaigns.
Am I "everyone"?Dukasaur wrote:I wasn't talking about the MSM, I was talking about you.
Fixed your quote for you.Dukasaur wrote:Why should there be? George's killer was an officer who had double digit complaints against him and flipped out during Geroge's detainment and inexcusably held his knee on George's neck for over 8 minutes. Was arrested, and will almost certainly spend the remainder of his existence behind bars. What's to be outraged about? Justice is being done.
If white people kill other white people and there is no fuss, then why should there be a fuss if black people kill other black people?jonesthecurl wrote:True, but,,,aAccording to the FBI. of the 2925 black people murdered in 2018, 2600 were killed by other blacks. On the other hand, of the 3315 white people murdered, 2677 were murdered by other white people. Where is the fuss about white on white murders?
Text, email, phone call, private message on Facebook, getting Michelle to ask them next to she sees them at a function etc.jimboston wrote:What is this obsession with Obama in this Forum?mrswdk wrote:Nest thing you know Obama will probably find out that little boy’s killer wrote a rap and invite him to visit the White House.
How can Obama invite someone to visit the White House?
Lol, you don't need to. You're not the first right-winger to bring these hackneyed old arguments to this forum. Just as they have a predictable beginning, they have a predictable end. After the "most blacks are killed by blacks" trope (Yes, most crimes are local acts between people in the same community, and since most American communities are racially segregated, that means most whites will be killed by whites and most blacks will be killed by blacks, yawn. It completely ignores the salient point that most killings by official mandate are white cops killing black prisoners.) you will switch to the "most blacks are killed in cities with Democrat mayors" trope (which nicely ignores the fact that most of the policies which encourage killing are Federal policies over which mayors and other local politicians have little or no influence.)Jdsizzleslice wrote:Did I say Democrat?Dukasaur wrote:LOL, I see you're working up the the traditional "blame the Democratic mayors" dodge that Republicans like to trot out. Since the causes of the violence are almost all Federal policies, there's sweet f*ck all the Democratic mayors can do about them, except be scapegoated for your campaigns.
Obviously "everyone" is an exaggeration. I should have said, "every right-winger." You're not the only right-winger I talk to, you know. Two days before you posted your little bit of canned outrage here, I was already seeing it on my Facebook page. Not just the same content, but even the same phrases. It's funny how you claim to be defenders of individualism, but you all goose-step so beautifully in unison. Bannon or Carlson holds up your cue-cards of hate, and you chant with a precision that rivals the local church of Krishna Consciousness.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Am I "everyone"?Dukasaur wrote:I wasn't talking about the MSM, I was talking about you.
Thank you thought police, for thinking you know what I am thinking even though I don't ever say it!Dukasaur wrote:Lol, you don't need to. You're not the first right-winger to bring these hackneyed old arguments to this forum. Just as they have a predictable beginning, they have a predictable end. After the "most blacks are killed by blacks" trope (Yes, most crimes are local acts between people in the same community, and since most American communities are racially segregated, that means most whites will be killed by whites and most blacks will be killed by blacks, yawn. It completely ignores the salient point that most killings by official mandate are white cops killing black prisoners.) you will switch to the "most blacks are killed in cities with Democrat mayors" trope (which nicely ignores the fact that most of the policies which encourage killing are Federal policies over which mayors and other local politicians have little or no influence.)
Ok, well you used the phrase "everyone" and then said next post me alone, specifically, so there is no logical consistency in your argument. You group me and then in the next phrase claim individuality. Which is it?Dukasaur wrote:Obviously "everyone" is an exaggeration. I should have said, "every right-winger." You're not the only right-winger I talk to, you know. Two days before you posted your little bit of canned outrage here, I was already seeing it on my Facebook page. Not just the same content, but even the same phrases. It's funny how you claim to be defenders of individualism, but you all goose-step so beautifully in unison. Bannon or Carlson holds up your cue-cards of hate, and you chant with a precision that rivals the local church of Krishna Consciousness.
How is this corruption?Jdsizzleslice wrote:Ergo, corruption.jimboston wrote:MSM only has a narrative as far as it promotes their financial interests.
I guess Obama can technically invite someone to the White House... but when the person walks up to the door they’ll find they can’t get in.mrswdk wrote:Text, email, phone call, private message on Facebook, getting Michelle to ask them next to she sees them at a function etc.jimboston wrote:What is this obsession with Obama in this Forum?mrswdk wrote:Nest thing you know Obama will probably find out that little boy’s killer wrote a rap and invite him to visit the White House.
How can Obama invite someone to visit the White House?
It's pretty clear to see where someone is going with an argument when you've seen a pattern repeat umpteen times.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Thank you thought police, for thinking you know what I am thinking even though I don't ever say it!Dukasaur wrote:Lol, you don't need to. You're not the first right-winger to bring these hackneyed old arguments to this forum. Just as they have a predictable beginning, they have a predictable end. After the "most blacks are killed by blacks" trope (Yes, most crimes are local acts between people in the same community, and since most American communities are racially segregated, that means most whites will be killed by whites and most blacks will be killed by blacks, yawn. It completely ignores the salient point that most killings by official mandate are white cops killing black prisoners.) you will switch to the "most blacks are killed in cities with Democrat mayors" trope (which nicely ignores the fact that most of the policies which encourage killing are Federal policies over which mayors and other local politicians have little or no influence.)
Context does matter. The meaning of words is dependent on the context in which they are used. In the context of the OP, it was pretty clear that I meant "you and all the people who think like you." It really isn't rocket science to discern which exact shade of a word's meaning is relevant in which situation.Jdsizzleslice wrote:Ok, well you used the phrase "everyone" and then said next post me alone, specifically, so there is no logical consistency in your argument. You group me and then in the next phrase claim individuality. Which is it?Dukasaur wrote:Obviously "everyone" is an exaggeration. I should have said, "every right-winger." You're not the only right-winger I talk to, you know. Two days before you posted your little bit of canned outrage here, I was already seeing it on my Facebook page. Not just the same content, but even the same phrases. It's funny how you claim to be defenders of individualism, but you all goose-step so beautifully in unison. Bannon or Carlson holds up your cue-cards of hate, and you chant with a precision that rivals the local church of Krishna Consciousness.
But you don't have self-serving independent media. Ergo, corruption.jimboston wrote:I would rather have a self-serving independent media than a government run media.
Justification for thought policing. You shouldn't make excuses for that. Period. That type of argument is an appeal to probability, which is a known logical fallacy with faulty generalizations. As I have told Jim before, Duk, don't assume. Spock would not be proud.Dukasaur wrote:It's pretty clear to see where someone is going with an argument when you've seen a pattern repeat umpteen times.
Or is pattern recognition something you don't believe?
You did explain the context, and you did clarify, by saying yourself that "everyone" meant "me."Dukasaur wrote:Context does matter. The meaning of words is dependent on the context in which they are used. In the context of the OP, it was pretty clear that I meant "you and all the people who think like you." It really isn't rocket science to discern which exact shade of a word's meaning is relevant in which situation.
Making your argument based upon an ecological fallacy (attributing one to a group, or a group to one) is illogical in discussion.Dukasaur wrote:I wasn't talking about the MSM, I was talking about you.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:But you don't have self-serving independent media. Ergo, corruption.jimboston wrote:I would rather have a self-serving independent media than a government run media.