Evil Semp wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:ive got a good stat
90% of the posts in this thread are not worth reading, and about 70% of those posts are made by people who aren't worth reading, 98.5% of the time
you're welcome
Hello Mr. 98%er
reported
Moderator: Community Team
Evil Semp wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:ive got a good stat
90% of the posts in this thread are not worth reading, and about 70% of those posts are made by people who aren't worth reading, 98.5% of the time
you're welcome
Hello Mr. 98%er
iAmCaffeine wrote:Evil Semp wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:ive got a good stat
90% of the posts in this thread are not worth reading, and about 70% of those posts are made by people who aren't worth reading, 98.5% of the time
you're welcome
Hello Mr. 98%er
reported
saxitoxin wrote:deaths among the unvaccinated are higher.
Jdsizzleslice wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Evil Semp wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:ive got a good stat
90% of the posts in this thread are not worth reading, and about 70% of those posts are made by people who aren't worth reading, 98.5% of the time
you're welcome
Hello Mr. 98%er
reported
Would this post be a part of the 90%, 70%, or 98.5% statistic you reference? Or is this a part of the 83.3% of all statistics that are made up on the fly?
Nut Shot Scott wrote:Jdsizzleslice wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Evil Semp wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:ive got a good stat
90% of the posts in this thread are not worth reading, and about 70% of those posts are made by people who aren't worth reading, 98.5% of the time
you're welcome
Hello Mr. 98%er
reported
Would this post be a part of the 90%, 70%, or 98.5% statistic you reference? Or is this a part of the 83.3% of all statistics that are made up on the fly?
i want to know who is in this mysterious 30% that Caff finds worthy of reading. so i have done some research. i believe this is a complete list of posters in this thread here so now, i'm going to take some guesses at what he thinks and let's see if we hit 70% of people not being worth reading... (no hard feelings folks, it's all in the name of fun!)
I've got it at best 12 out of 37, most likely 11 which puts us right at 70%. I believe that statistic, while definitely made up by Caff, proves to be accurate in his mind.
Evil semp wrote:
I respectfully disagree with you putting me on the no list. The reason. I know he read my post.
Nut Shot Scott wrote:Evil semp wrote:
I respectfully disagree with you putting me on the no list. The reason. I know he read my post.
Ah, but is it WORTH reading? I think this post alone would confirm that no, he does not think your posts are worth reading i jest, i jest
Swimmerdude99 wrote:Nut Shot Scott wrote:Evil semp wrote:
I respectfully disagree with you putting me on the no list. The reason. I know he read my post.
Ah, but is it WORTH reading? I think this post alone would confirm that no, he does not think your posts are worth reading i jest, i jest
But, if Caff chooses to read it (and he is, as we know, the one who determines if something is worth reading), doesn't the very act of him reading it prove it is worth reading? And in addition, the paradox continues to unfold in that if he DIDN'T read it, wouldn't that mean he can't determine if its worth reading?
If not, then I must be forced to assume that Caff, by the very act of reading something which is not worth reading, invalidates his own throne. Therefore all things read by Caff either dethrone him or he must, in fact, say that all posts he does read, are worth reading.
In the end, I think he is just a fraud, and not actually the "post worth reading" definitive that I thought he was
Hunter S. Thompson wrote:The Edge... There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over..
Caymanmew wrote:Umm Josko's record vs erazor is now 20 - 17...
Looks like Josko's going to win the Poly 4 Unlimited Zombie World 2.1 though
Still he will be under 50%
Swimmerdude99 wrote:Nut Shot Scott wrote:Evil semp wrote:
I respectfully disagree with you putting me on the no list. The reason. I know he read my post.
Ah, but is it WORTH reading? I think this post alone would confirm that no, he does not think your posts are worth reading i jest, i jest
But, if Caff chooses to read it (and he is, as we know, the one who determines if something is worth reading), doesn't the very act of him reading it prove it is worth reading? And in addition, the paradox continues to unfold in that if he DIDN'T read it, wouldn't that mean he can't determine if its worth reading?
If not, then I must be forced to assume that Caff, by the very act of reading something which is not worth reading, invalidates his own throne. Therefore all things read by Caff either dethrone him or he must, in fact, say that all posts he does read, are worth reading.
In the end, I think he is just a fraud, and not actually the "post worth reading" definitive that I thought he was
BabySasuke wrote:Swimmerdude99 wrote:Nut Shot Scott wrote:Evil semp wrote:
I respectfully disagree with you putting me on the no list. The reason. I know he read my post.
Ah, but is it WORTH reading? I think this post alone would confirm that no, he does not think your posts are worth reading i jest, i jest
But, if Caff chooses to read it (and he is, as we know, the one who determines if something is worth reading), doesn't the very act of him reading it prove it is worth reading? And in addition, the paradox continues to unfold in that if he DIDN'T read it, wouldn't that mean he can't determine if its worth reading?
If not, then I must be forced to assume that Caff, by the very act of reading something which is not worth reading, invalidates his own throne. Therefore all things read by Caff either dethrone him or he must, in fact, say that all posts he does read, are worth reading.
In the end, I think he is just a fraud, and not actually the "post worth reading" definitive that I thought he was
he reads without reading
i-andrei wrote:
...after he became a naruto wannabe.
mookiemcgee wrote:I feel confident the OP would do the exact same thing given the chance.
wasn't there already an official ruling on this? Why now an poor attempt at public shaming?
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users