Moderator: Community Team
He's adding a third vote to two joke votes, and only six votes are needed. He seems to want his vote to come off as a joke vote, too, but then again he seems to want the vote to count. A tiny bit later, he misreads my lame comment about Votanic (or he skipped the parenthesis), which indicates that he's skimming. That's more than I usually get to play with D1.[/quote][/spoiler]Ragian wrote:Up to speed now (ignored a fair few of Son!c's "I know everything about Denmark and bananas" posts because imagined knowledge gets on my tits).
Claim
I'm nothing more than a Vanilla Townie. Luckily, that makes me expendable and I can still win if the rest of town gets its shit together. This post will also contain my scummy to chummy list, so feel free to lynch me afterwards.
Going for Devante, not going for Max
In my opinion, Devante was the most scummy D1, which I stated several times. Moreover, as stated a fair few times, I could see no long term benefit of voting for Max (unless, of course, he was scum, but it felt like guessing more than actual detective work).Spoiler
[quote="Ragian"]I find it weird that some people are gunning for Max when others don't contribute either. In my head that indicates that they want to drive attention away from other non-contributors and have an easy lynch of Max. Another reason I don't like lynching almost-non-contributors is that the benefit of the lynch - or the info from the lynch - is more or less non-existing. We need to lynch someone who has actively pointed her or his fingers in order to get information for the long run. I want to [color=#FF0000][b]vote Devante[/b][/color] because of his vote on Strike that didn't sit well with me: [quote="Devante"]Last time we joked about him being a wolf and he turned out to be scum so why not. He should really ask for a name change [b][color=#FF0000]VOTE STRIKE[/color][/b] I'm for a D1 lynch personally. Seems to be the only way town can get lucky other then waiting to be killed off
Ugh...I don't understand this question. Are you asking if you can buy my vote later to vote Max? No, you can't, but you can persuade me if he acts scummily or out of character. I haven't seen that yet.Loose Canon wrote:Rag, it also has occurred to me that you have targetted Max as a vote you can buy off of you later in the game?
This is absolutely untrue, Captain Hindsight! DDS played with his di...beer in his hand that entire D1 by straying from his M.O. until it was noticed after which he changed his tune. He made it VERY easy to mislynch him. This game is different in that I'm not scum.Loose Canon wrote:And in fact Rag just looking back now at the last game, you and Max were 2 of the initial 3 and had stuck at the end on the D1 mislynch of DDS.
You weren't shy of a no evidence lynch then.
So yep the more I think about it there is a definite case that as scum you see Max as a player you can draw into your pocket.
I agree 100%.Loose Canon wrote:Lets state the facts we can agree on:
6 Players Remaining made up of
1 Werewolf
1 Mafia
2 Town Masons
2 Town Vanilla
2 Masons each have a 50% chance if sticking a pin of voting for scum.
2 Vanilla town each have a 50% chance if sticking a pin of voting scum (masons would declare if in danger of being lynched)
2 Scum each have a 1 in 3 chance if sticking a pin of voting rival scum (masons declare if in danger)
EW + X killed Devante and Traf
Traf + Y killed Strike + EW
IF we keep these facts in mind at all times we may be able to Deduce who X and Y are most likely to be, D3.
Does anyone want to disagree with the above framework?

At the time of posting this me and Sonic had votes on max. EW stuck on max. I don't think EW could have unvoted max after posting the above. EW added to a real possibility that max would be lynched D1.Extreme Ways wrote:I have decided I like Max to go over despite what Rag says. He's right, we can't take any defense or push on him as info because there's no posts of his to attack or defend. Chance that a townie defends town!Max because he's low hanging fruit is as high as a scummie thinking it might get him good boy points. Chance that someone defends scum!Max is also very justifiable because anyone can hide behind the "well there was exactly a random chance that he was scum given that he didnt give us anything".
That being said, I also dont want to get into an endgame where we have to rely on Max to vote correctly or do something. Imagine worst case scenario: overnight both scums kill townies, and we lynched a townie in Max. Is this really worse than being in the same scenario with a townie in Max? We will have this same debate again on whether Max is allowed to live another day.
Town gets a couple lynches this game, I didnt check the previous games but after 2 nights theres likely 4 nightkills UNLESS one scum party gets wiped out n1. Imo a Max lynch satisfies the "always lynch" crowd despite it being a meh lynch as well as a "no lynch" crowd because they also dont want to ask themselves the same questions tomorrow.
vote max
This does seen towny post. It makes sense and breaks the game down well. I shall reread with this in mind.Loose Canon wrote:Lets state the facts we can agree on:
6 Players Remaining made up of
1 Werewolf
1 Mafia
2 Town Masons
2 Town Vanilla
2 Masons each have a 50% chance if sticking a pin of voting for scum.
2 Vanilla town each have a 50% chance if sticking a pin of voting scum (masons would declare if in danger of being lynched)
2 Scum each have a 1 in 3 chance if sticking a pin of voting rival scum (masons declare if in danger)
EW + X killed Devante and Traf
Traf + Y killed Strike + EW
IF we keep these facts in mind at all times we may be able to Deduce who X and Y are most likely to be, D3.
Does anyone want to disagree with the above framework?
Pepe had voted Traf.TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:Not sure what to think of Rag. Will think about this for some time before making my mind.
For now I am pretty sure Pepe is Scum as I've said many times
He wanted a lynch then he decides not to hammer as he know that would make him inta suspect and decided toc ast a vote on me for no reason.
Vote Pepe
You have said flattering things about my play this game PMC.pmchugh wrote:Not surprised by either of them, they were both in my shortlist but stupidly and went for poor ragian. Honestly thought that was a hit. Glad my tactic of baiting scum into shooting EW worked![]()
I do now get the feeling one of sonic or LC is wolf. Not sure which one yet but it felt like they took my slight hint at rag and hard with it.
I think its just the ease with which the rag wagon went that makes me think it wasn't just hiveminding townies. I'm not picking two people at random but the two talkative steering the game players.Loose Canon wrote:You have said flattering things about my play this game PMC.pmchugh wrote:Not surprised by either of them, they were both in my shortlist but stupidly and went for poor ragian. Honestly thought that was a hit. Glad my tactic of baiting scum into shooting EW worked![]()
I do now get the feeling one of sonic or LC is wolf. Not sure which one yet but it felt like they took my slight hint at rag and hard with it.
That could be consistent with you being scum.
The probability of picking any 2 players and saying one of them is scum is not that small.
I could say the same of you and sonic or you and anyone at the moment and I'd have a decent shot of that turning out right.
You'd or I would also be hinting we are town or mason, and if you or I did turn out to be right we would look more townie rest of the game.
From a scum perspective any remaining scum player doesn't stand that good a chance of winning at the present time.
So why not throw the either or shot?
You've just thrown some suss on yourself PMC.
I have to re read the set up but i don't believe this to be right from Charles sign up page. Not unless he deviated.Loose Canon wrote:Lets state the facts we can agree on:
6 Players Remaining made up of
1 Werewolf
1 Mafia
2 Town Masons
2 Town Vanilla
2 Masons each have a 50% chance if sticking a pin of voting for scum.
2 Vanilla town each have a 50% chance if sticking a pin of voting scum (masons would declare if in danger of being lynched)
2 Scum each have a 1 in 3 chance if sticking a pin of voting rival scum (masons declare if in danger)
EW + X killed Devante and Traf
Traf + Y killed Strike + EW
IF we keep these facts in mind at all times we may be able to Deduce who X and Y are most likely to be, D3.
Does anyone want to disagree with the above framework?
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
PepeAtila wrote:well it was a 'good night' at least they are killing between them.
I really has not idea about their pairs.
I was suspect about Traf but no about EW...
Now with the listPepeAtila wrote:PLAYER LIST:I can try to guess who the scums are, but it will be very unlikely to be success. I just can follow any leadirshipSpoiler
DDS Sonic Kong [b][color=#0000FF]Replaced[/color][/b] by pmchugh Loose Max PepeAtila
who do you think are the scums?
Charle wrote:The night passed very quick, or at least it felt like it. While Town was asleep, Mafia and Wolves gathered with a huge fight
Night Result:It is now Day 3, with 6 alive you need 4 to lynchSpoiler
[color=#0000FF]Mafia decided to Kill[/color] [color=#FF8000]EW Wolf[/color] [color=#0000FF]Wolves decided to eat[/color] [color=#FF4000]Traf Mafia[/color]

Revising how to not look/act totally scummy when you're actually town?Ragian wrote:Charle wrote:The night passed very quick, or at least it felt like it. While Town was asleep, Mafia and Wolves gathered with a huge fight
Night Result:It is now Day 3, with 6 alive you need 4 to lynchSpoiler
[color=#0000FF]Mafia decided to Kill[/color] [color=#FF8000]EW Wolf[/color] [color=#0000FF]Wolves decided to eat[/color] [color=#FF4000]Traf Mafia[/color]![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm back to revising in my tomb.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
I have the exact same feeling, masterly played for a fool (on Rag), and also the exact same list in my mind, except on EW - i had him "as good as lock town" as Mason.DirtyDishSoap wrote:Regardless. I think Pepes gameplay has been more damning then Max. However, that leaves someone likely a bit more clever. I had EW and Traf at the top of my list following the lynch, followed with Pepe, Max, Loose, Sonic, PMC. (Most likely, least likely).
I think Rags train had at least 1 to 2 scumsters on it.
I'm gonna have to give it a bit more thought until i commit. I think I'm being played for a fool.

Okay, that's actually the most detailed post you've had outside of just a sentence and vote behind someone. You more or less just admitted you followed people without much thought. Do you not see why that's scummy?PepeAtila wrote:it's clear that someone is trying to make me look scum,...but there are two scums in the game and I'm not one of them...who will the two be?
The day D1 I was voting trying to get information, I did read wrongly about Strike and DDS,
so the day D2 I was just following DDS leadership I was feeling Traf was scum but people did vote Rag and then I voted Traf to see if anyone changed their vote after Rag's explanations... but nobody did it, and even the opossite: Rag and LC unvoted Traf, then I thought it was for nothing to wait more to hammer.
day D3 I felt it was a 'good day' but there are people against me, anyway I think that WE (town) are going to win, because it is just easy to find the scums.
I try to read the future:
if we lynch a scum today (LC says 50%), tonight the other scum will kill 1 townie...
... so for tomorrow 3 townies and 1 scum.
if we lynch a townie today (LC says 50%), tonight the scums can kill 2 people...
for each of them there is 25% to kill the other scum faction and 75% to kill a townie ...
so for tomorrow:
56% they will kill 2 townies, (1 town and 2 scums)
37% they will kill one scum and one town (2 town and 1 scum)
and 7% they kill each other, (3 townies).
I think these are approx the posibilities...
All of this to say just think twice before lynch today...
we have a lot of probabilities to win, but we have to be careful.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.