Moderator: Community Team



Very very very curious unvote.Charle wrote:Sorry for radio silence, a bit busy at work at the moment. I agree with Strike, nothing really stands out for me at the moment, very difficult to follow.
We need to get a lynch out anyway, so I am happy to go with whoever you guys decide. Will unvote for now.
Unvote
help I forgot that CHarle was basically confirmed town for all intents and purposeskongming3 wrote:I would generally agree with you Loose. However, while I'd still struggle to actually try to lynch Charle (because of the leaked PM scandal), I don't get how you can go from needing to get a lynch out and "happy to go with whoever you guys decide" to then unvoting the person closest to a lynch and for whom the most people decided to vote.
For what it's worth, the amount of hard intel we have to work with will be pretty limited this game so we're kind of forced into making lynches we can't be fully sure about. I think JFM makes sense as a potential lynch at this stage because of the pattern of odd behaviour and forced attempts at spreading false narratives (which I just can't see how that'd make sense to do as town.) If someone can make a compelling case otherwise or for someone else we can reconsider, but he'd be my number one choice going into the final five days.



OK JazzFM, you weren't playing any of my hits.Charle wrote:The only reason for my unvote was so that if town decide to go for someone else, but as it seems now, it is jfm. So let's get on with it then.
Vote jfm
You are hilarious in this game Loose. And tingling all my spidersenses doing so.Loose Canon wrote:OK JazzFM, you weren't playing any of my hits.Charle wrote:The only reason for my unvote was so that if town decide to go for someone else, but as it seems now, it is jfm. So let's get on with it then.
Vote jfm
Best you say your piece, leave your legacy suspicions etc cos it looks like the other guys don't like your music either.

Loose Canon wrote:This isn't aimed at Ew, he has actively participated throughout.
I think it's a bit feeble going suspicious and voting on players who have tried to drive probing and banter.
I won't be surprised if this (sonic edit: lynching jfm) leads to a mislynch.
If there is a scum among us active ones waiting till now then voting because we seem off or something like that is still less likely to be successful than a low poster.
For what it's worth I'm holding a suspicion on sonic still for his relative to himself lack of meaningful activity D1 till irresistibly for him posting activity d2. Also his threats to leave d2.
But I'd rather go for a player like dev or traf

Curious if you are trigger happy but pretending not to be.Devante wrote:Not looking to hammer here. Are we letting jfm respond since L-1 or are we done with this?
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Now you say you want to kill Traf or Dev today (instead of JFM).Loose Canon wrote:Record deal isn't what I deserve that's true, but I get paid handsome royalties from Spotascum these days.

Sonic, Traf doubled down later (recently) on this. Its just appearing Town by casting easy suspicions.TrafalgarLaw01 wrote:Sus on the 3 that voted Charle recently



Charle, my gut feeling says its Loose 100%. He went after Pix, me, Traf and Devante. All players who would pose a threat to him later on in the game.. But he will not touch JFM.. even now when JFM says "im fine being lynched"????Charle wrote:Looks like you guys are playing "spin the bottle" here to decide your votes. If jfm turns scum, we seriously have to look at those who did not wanted to hammer when the opportunity was there. At the moment both Loose and Sonic are throwing loose darts here which IMHO should be a serious FOS on both.
