\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.
Moderator: Community Team
cawck mongler
Posts: 284 Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:49 pm
Post
by cawck mongler » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:18 pm
So whoever gets this right is the new king of the forums or something.
t^3+t^2-3t-9
---------------
t+3
Everynight my dad tells me to do this shit, and everynight he gets pissed off because I don't know how, so tell me. DONT ASK ME WHY I HAVE TO DO THIS.
The t^2 and stuff means 2 over t, and its t^3+t^2 etc. over t+3, so divide.
diddle
Posts: 7972 Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: Yes
Post
by diddle » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:31 pm
cawck mongler wrote: So whoever gets this right is the new king of the forums or something. t^3+t^2-3t-9 --------------- t+3 Everynight my dad tells me to do this shit, and everynight he gets pissed off because I don't know how, so tell me. DONT ASK ME WHY I HAVE TO DO THIS. The t^2 and stuff means 2 over t, and its t^3+t^2 etc. over t+3, so divide.
=7
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:32 pm
Disregard ^
The answer is t^2+2t-3
So am I the king of the forums or something?
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:34 pm
t = -1, -1.44 or 1.44
Last edited by
Norse on Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:38 pm, edited 4 times in total.
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:35 pm
The above results are when the subsequent graph line pass through the t-axis...(well, not quite the t-axis, but at y=6)
Last edited by
Norse on Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:36 pm
Why are you people giving values? The answer is a factor.
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:37 pm
Norse wrote: The above results are when the subsequent graph line pass through the t-axis...
You solved for t... you didn't give the answer
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:38 pm
BTW I hate math. This is just coming back from 9th grade
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:39 pm
Arbustos wrote: Norse wrote: The above results are when the subsequent graph line pass through the t-axis...
You solved for t... you didn't give the answer
yes I did, did you want me to give a basic factorized equation? or prefer me to give the actual value?
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Aegnor
Posts: 1600 Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Uranus
Post
by Aegnor » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:41 pm
t=3
, it can't be -3 because you get division by zero then.
"War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left" -Anonymous
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:42 pm
Why did you alter your results post 4 times? And I may be forgetting something (and probably am), but how do you get 3 x-values with a parabola?
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:42 pm
t^3+t^2-3t-9=0
(t^2-3)(t+1)-6=0
(t-3^0.5)(t-3^0.5)(t+1)-6=0
solved
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:42 pm
Screw this, I hate math
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:43 pm
Arbustos wrote: Why did you alter your results post 4 times? And I may be forgetting something (and probably am), but how do you get 3 x-values with a parabola?
It isnt a parabola, it becomes muted 3 times, like all cubed equations
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:44 pm
Norse wrote: Arbustos wrote: Why did you alter your results post 4 times? And I may be forgetting something (and probably am), but how do you get 3 x-values with a parabola?
It isnt a parabola, it passes the t-axis 3 times, like all cubed equations
No, I mean the factor. Explain this to me, I've forgotten so much
Did you divide by the t+3?
Aegnor
Posts: 1600 Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Uranus
Post
by Aegnor » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:45 pm
(t+3)(t+3)(t-3)
----------------- = 0
t+3
Do your own math from here buddies
I simplified the original equation. Now you can eliminate the denominator, and you get:
(t+3)(t-3)=0
Magical isn't it?
Last edited by
Aegnor on Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left" -Anonymous
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:46 pm
Arbustos wrote: Norse wrote: Arbustos wrote: Why did you alter your results post 4 times? And I may be forgetting something (and probably am), but how do you get 3 x-values with a parabola?
It isnt a parabola, it passes the t-axis 3 times, like all cubed equations
No, I mean the factor. Explain this to me, I've forgotten so much
Did you divide by the t+3?
no no, just factorized the original equation.
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:47 pm
Aegnor wrote: (t+3)(t+3)(t-3)
----------------- = 0
t+3
Do your own math from here buddies
@$#% That was too easy... I don't have a mind for math
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:48 pm
Aegnor wrote: (t+3)(t+3)(t-3)
----------------- = 0
t+3
Do your own math from here buddies
wrong im afraid...
expand them factors, and yyou will end up with..
t^3+6t^2+18t-27
a little off there
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:49 pm
Aegnor wrote: (t+3)(t+3)(t-3)
----------------- = 0
t+3
Do your own math from here buddies
I simplified the original equation. Now you can eliminate the denominator, and you get:
(t+3)(t-3)=0
Magical isn't it?
hehe, way off the mark there, nothings ever that easy....go back and re-read
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:49 pm
Norse wrote: Aegnor wrote: (t+3)(t+3)(t-3)
----------------- = 0
t+3
Do your own math from here buddies
wrong im afraid...
expand them factors, and yyou will end up with..
t^3+6t^2+18t-27
a little off there
Well, I blindly accepted it because the steps were correct. Damn this
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:51 pm
(t+3)(t+3) = t^2+9t+9
{t^2+9t+9}(t-3) =t^3+6t^2+18t-27
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
Aegnor
Posts: 1600 Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Uranus
Post
by Aegnor » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:52 pm
Ah crap, I guess you're right! I feel into that trap blindly
"War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left" -Anonymous
Arbustos
Posts: 1589 Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:28 pm
Location: in a shrub
Post
by Arbustos » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:54 pm
From the factors, wouldn't the solution be 1, since -3 causes a division by zero scenario?
Factors: (t+3)(t+3)(t-1)
Norse
Posts: 4227 Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.
Post
by Norse » Thu Aug 30, 2007 4:56 pm
Norse wrote: t^3+t^2-3t-9=0 (t^2-3)(t+1)-6=0 (t-3^0.5)(t-3^0.5)(t+1)-6=0 solved
QFT!
^0.5 means squared root, btw.
b.k. barunt wrote: Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote: scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.