MountainLion wrote:Trestain, are you sure about Anark? You had a vote on him, then unvoted and then voted him again...
no i am not sure but he has been caught lying, something which town do not do.
If you believe that, you have obviously not played many of the mafia games on this site... Townies lie all the time..
And, as I said, it wasn't a lie, it was meant as a joke.
If you wish to vote me off already, go for it, but it will benefit the .lhkflksjadh Mafia or whatever the hell their name is.
i remember when i was a noob i said "go ahead and lynch me" and you went sick and said if i did it again that i would be blacklisted from every game because of you and you would make sure i never played again. and then you went all nice and said "just learn from it and dont do it again"
See, the difference here is that I know better. But I'm also not going to defend myself for the next four pages.
Here are the choices:
1. we can look for someone else
2. you all can lynch me and waste a member of the republic who is loyal to the jedis
3. we can "No lynch", which I am against, and then we can see who won the duel...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
wicked wrote:I'm of the philosophy that we should lynch all liars as well. unvote vote Ank
You are also the biggest scum bandwagoner in the history of CC mafia games...
My philosophy is always do exactly the opposite of what Wicked suggests.
and yet you emulate me??? no Ank, when I'm scum, I'm just as comfortable leading the vote as I am bandwaggoning it; you obviously haven't played with me that much.
Sure anarkistsdream was apparantly messing about and fircoal got lynched for similar bad behaviour in the braveheart game but I'm not sure if its the best policy in this case. I'm more suspicious of wicked because of the bandwagoning performance she just put on.
and how did I bandwagon? were there already 4-5+ votes on him and I voted for no good reason? umm no. you guys better look up the definition of bandwaggoning before falsely accusing someone of it. but since some of you are throwing a hissy fit, the real reason I voted Ank was to see if anyone else would bandwagon ya dorks. now that that's shot thanks to ya noobs, I'll unvote.
and how did I bandwagon? were there already 4-5+ votes on him and I voted for no good reason? umm no. you guys better look up the definition of bandwaggoning before falsely accusing someone of it. but since some of you are throwing a hissy fit, the real reason I voted Ank was to see if anyone else would bandwagon ya dorks. now that that's shot thanks to ya noobs, I'll unvote.
That's a load of BS... Your old tricks just don't work so well anymore...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I only thought it was the 2nd. oh well. Not backtracking at all... I used to write in zero text when I was doing something like that, but since most know that trick now I didn't. whatever vote me if you want, I'm not worried.
firth4eva wrote:vote wicked because when she first got accused she jumped on the first oppurtunity to divert attention away from her by jumoing on nags fos
hmm, where did I jump on nags? and I would never try to divert attention with only a handful of votes on me anyway.
remember the first rule of scumminess boys: townies act like scum, scum are agreeable. so getting all up in arms over me know only proves that I'm town.
no Ank, when I'm scum, I'm just as comfortable leading the vote as I am bandwaggoning it; you obviously haven't played with me that much.
This reeks of WIFOM 
