So what? I said my suspicions are getting the same again. I've always had suspicions with Nag and ML. I've stated them before, then just before then.
Is it just me, or are the French always thinking I'm scum?
Moderator: Community Team
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
I only said we had all the time in the world in relation to gt's statement in the post before mine saying we didn't have much time left today, not meaning we shouldn't have lynched him. It was also half in jest because of the revealing of Moz's role and the game not ending, thus the next sentence of my post that you quoted.MountainLion wrote:I found some interesting posts by kalish right on the two pages just before Exile is lynched. Kalish suggests that Exile's claim as survivor could become a more useful role later on which is an agreement with what Exile said about his "roleclaim."
On page 78:
Then just before the hammer is dropped on Exile, Kalish FOS'd Tonka for voting Exile and says "we've got all the time in the world" which sounds like a plea for everyone to stop voting Exile.kalishnikov wrote:Well if Exile's claim is true, I don't see a need to lynch him quite yet. If we get no better leads he would make a decent fall-back to end Day 2. Another possibility, perhaps he's linked to a different character to gain his powers. I'm not sure how or why but he may yet be useful to us at some point.
On page 79:
vote kalishkalishnikov wrote:Oh yea, FOS: gt.got tonkaed wrote:vote exile
it seems like this will be the only real line that can be explored in the time left today.
What did you mean? We've got all the time in the world... Even when someone wins, the game isn't over. Do you know something that we don't?
You didn't just buy his claim, you denied the whole charges against him all along the day.Skittles! wrote:Oh please. Because I bought Exile's claim doesn't mean I'm scum.
So what? I said my suspicions are getting the same again. I've always had suspicions with Nag and ML. I've stated them before, then just before then.
Is it just me, or are the French always thinking I'm scum?
I know you're the only French mafia player here. And we've played a few, and everytime you think your 'scumdar' tings off when i post.ga7 wrote:You didn't just buy his claim, you denied the whole charges against him all along the day.Skittles! wrote:Oh please. Because I bought Exile's claim doesn't mean I'm scum.
So what? I said my suspicions are getting the same again. I've always had suspicions with Nag and ML. I've stated them before, then just before then.
Is it just me, or are the French always thinking I'm scum?
Btw, I'm the only french mafia player here and I don't think we've played so often
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
I guarantee you are not yoda...Minister Masket wrote:Out of sheer curiosity and boredom, who do you lot think I am in the NJO Universe?
And no I'm not telling you if you're right or wrong.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
So I contradict you and you agree with me?kalishnikov wrote:I think that goes without saying. The first 'rule' of being scum is only make the kill that doesn't bring suspicion back on you, i.e. someone lying low and not posting much.wicked wrote:ugh, having been on the receiving end of that "logic", I can tell you that's total BS. There are a number of high target players in this game. Scum don't have to have a reason to kill someone, they often look for whomever will draw the least suspicion to them. It's most likely not a "coincidence" or him being a "smart player" or anything other than he was off the radar.kalishnikov wrote:No, I don't think it's coincidence. He's a smart player and if he's not scum the mafia always try to take him out or recruit him early, just like mandalorian and Fircoal. If any of them live past night 5 in a game they are probably scum...
wicked wrote:nah more annoying than anything else. so you don't have a post restriction then?Minister Masket wrote:T'is appropriate, is it not?wicked wrote:MM do you have a post restriction, or are you just talking like that for shits and grins?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Okay I agree that him saying we had limited time warrants an FOS on Tonka. You still didn't vote him, however, and you were there at the end of his lynch.kalishnikov wrote:I only said we had all the time in the world in relation to gt's statement in the post before mine saying we didn't have much time left today, not meaning we shouldn't have lynched him. It was also half in jest because of the revealing of Moz's role and the game not ending, thus the next sentence of my post that you quoted.
I didn't FOS him for voting Exile, I FOS'ed him for his statement of limited time, as did a few others. Just thought it was an odd thing to say as there are no deadlines.
Skittles! wrote:It also looks like Nagerous and ML are leading us here. I'm not too sure if I like that. Suspicious because that's what I do when I'm scum.
I'm back to my usual suspicion of Nag and ML. Actually..
vote Nag
FOS ML
See where this gets us.

I made the post which you are referring to and left (Exile was at 12), then the following 2 posts by firth and wicked hammered him. If I would have checked back and there was still votes needed I'd have jumped on the wagon.MountainLion wrote:Okay I agree that him saying we had limited time warrants an FOS on Tonka. You still didn't vote him, however, and you were there at the end of his lynch.kalishnikov wrote:I only said we had all the time in the world in relation to gt's statement in the post before mine saying we didn't have much time left today, not meaning we shouldn't have lynched him. It was also half in jest because of the revealing of Moz's role and the game not ending, thus the next sentence of my post that you quoted.
I didn't FOS him for voting Exile, I FOS'ed him for his statement of limited time, as did a few others. Just thought it was an odd thing to say as there are no deadlines.
So why didn't you vote him?
Yea, I guess thats what happened. My original statement was made from observations over the course of many games though, not just this one. He seems to turn up dead early quite often.wicked wrote:So I contradict you and you agree with me?kalishnikov wrote:I think that goes without saying. The first 'rule' of being scum is only make the kill that doesn't bring suspicion back on you, i.e. someone lying low and not posting much.wicked wrote:ugh, having been on the receiving end of that "logic", I can tell you that's total BS. There are a number of high target players in this game. Scum don't have to have a reason to kill someone, they often look for whomever will draw the least suspicion to them. It's most likely not a "coincidence" or him being a "smart player" or anything other than he was off the radar.kalishnikov wrote:No, I don't think it's coincidence. He's a smart player and if he's not scum the mafia always try to take him out or recruit him early, just like mandalorian and Fircoal. If any of them live past night 5 in a game they are probably scum...I don't have time to really read through and research what's been posted recently, but I'll try to do that at lunch today and vote.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.

Talapus wrote: I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.