possible multis - yossarian87 and alpine87 [Cleared]

mighty_serb · Post by **mighty_serb** » Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:30 pm

Check out game 55857

Me and my partner lost the game already in ROUND 1. Unbeleivable how well these two divided the continent, and made protection for each other, and won in just 3 turns (took 4 to eliminate the last country).

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:34 am

Lemme get this right, you're accusing TEAMMATES you were playing AGAINST of colluding against you and your teammate? shocker! And that game went 4 rounds, not 1. What exactly is your proof they're possible multi's?

mighty_serb · Post by **mighty_serb** » Thu Aug 17, 2006 4:45 pm

Please, don't twist my words.
Did I say they weren't supposed to ally against me and my teammate? Oh my, I wonder what teamgames are for????

Proof? Do you have to have conclusive evidence maybe, because I am sure these forums were created because NOONE can produce such evidence,
I am here simply to state that:

-The name similarity
-The time gap between their turns was exceptionally short (wasn't checking the minutes though)
-The superb organization (the game was over in turn 4, but the balance of game was lost in turn 1, that's what I meant).
-My teammate agreed that I should report.

So there you have it. I appreciate your patience.

OwlLawyer · Post by **OwlLawyer** » Thu Aug 17, 2006 5:29 pm

I offer you the same advice I just offered a troubled poster in another forum.

Stop being such a pussy.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Thu Aug 17, 2006 7:56 pm

Fill out the FORM correctly and maybe we will take a look at it.

--Andy

Sir Gordalot · Post by **Sir Gordalot** » Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:36 pm

well let's see... it's a team sequential game so being a multi wouldn't help that much since they would have to play the turns at different times... as for organization could be friends with msn or they made good use of the team chat... and as for it only going 4 rounds... 2 expeirenced players playing against 2 new recruits... 4 rounds is about right

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:05 pm

serb, if you would've provided more details in your original complaint (by using the form), then maybe we wouldn't had to have guessed why you thought they were multis. Coordinating moves is part of a team game!!! Often that involves playing one right after the other since often teammates wait for each other to get online to strategize. Just because a team was well coordinated and able to put the game away rather quickly, doesn't mean they're multis. Suck it up cupcake.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:31 am

I've played yossarian.. hes just a good player at doubles..

suck it up cupcake

mighty_serb · Post by **mighty_serb** » Fri Aug 18, 2006 1:58 am

"Stop being such a pussy."

Thanks for the advice. I've always wanted to be an asshole, so I guess I'll change

Well actually never mind, you are right, even though I've played RISK hundreds of time in real life, teamgame is totaly new to me. I actually didn't even know I could give my ally my own armies, lol. So we lost.

I am not gonna bother with the form, I've just played two more teamgames meanwhile, and I realized how ORGANIZED some players are, and that name similarities happen all the time, so yeah, NEVER MIND guys.

And speaking of cupcakes, I'd prefer a cheesecake.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Fri Aug 18, 2006 2:06 am

mighty_serb wrote:"Stop being such a pussy."

Thanks for the advice. I've always wanted to be an asshole, so I guess I'll change

I prefer dicks...

Its always nice to have a mans part by my side.

yossarian87 · Post by **yossarian87** » Sun Aug 20, 2006 10:59 pm

Alpine87 and I are good friends. We spend a lot of time each day on the phone discussing our strategy. I recommend playing doubles with people you know IRL -- it's much more fun.

possible multis - yossarian87 and alpine87 [Cleared]

possible multis - yossarian87 and alpine87 [Cleared]

hh

re

Re: re