That might seem like a strange question, because the entire game is about threatening and attacking.
But what if someone says in chat, "Don't attack me, or I'll suicide on you. I don't care if it costs me the game." -- Is it wrong (legally? morally?) to make the threat in the first place? And is it wrong to act on it? Could this fall under the rule against "throwing the game"?
What about variations. For instance, someone who declares in chat, "If you break my bonus next round, I'll break your bonus for three rounds minimum, no matter what it costs me."
And if you think either the stronger form of this threat, or any weaker variation, is unfair, would it warrant a negative feedback? Would it warrant any stronger action (from admin staff or whatever)?
MeDeFe wrote:A good player shouldn't have to threaten the others to make them do what he wants.
I agree, if a player is truly good he/she should be able to manipulate his opponent's movements and actions using nothing more than intellect and clever tactics.
MeDeFe wrote:A good player shouldn't have to threaten the others to make them do what he wants.
What about dugcarr1? He was one of the best players, and he threatened all the time.
That's because it is just an opinion that he was one of the best players. It is also just an opinion that the best players don't need to threaten others.
Both opinions can exist, but they both can't be right
MeDeFe wrote:A good player shouldn't have to threaten the others to make them do what he wants.
What about dugcarr1? He was one of the best players, and he threatened all the time.
That's because it is just an opinion that he was one of the best players. It is also just an opinion that the best players don't need to threaten others.
Both opinions can exist, but they both can't be right
both opinions can can exist,-- they both can be right, just not at the same time
MeDeFe wrote:A good player shouldn't have to threaten the others to make them do what he wants.
What about dugcarr1? He was one of the best players, and he threatened all the time.
That's because it is just an opinion that he was one of the best players. It is also just an opinion that the best players don't need to threaten others.
Both opinions can exist, but they both can't be right
both opinions can can exist,-- they both can be right, just not at the same time
Nope. Both can be right at the same time. Just because a good player shouldn't have to make threats doesn't mean they can't.
in some situations a nice little friendly threat is the only thing that may keep you alive...
if you need a bonus, and you cant possibly hold it...putting all the guys in one spot and threatening total annhiliation if someone breaks it may be the only way you stay in a game and win...
since I have at least one of these wins under my belt...one from a position of being dead last in the game, ...i see no problem with it at all...in the right circumstances...
this is a psychological game, and getting others not to attack you is the only real way to win.
now with duggy, his threats often got him the exact opposite response...so you have to becareful how you approach them...
it only becomes cheating, if one player is repeatedly doing it for the obvious gain of another in many games....then its a different situation all together...
in any case...if not handled properly, it may warrant feedback...so again...caution is urged
I think threats become unfair when they take the form of "Let me win this game or I will kill your spouse". But up to that point they're pretty cool...
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
AAFitz wrote:in some situations a nice little friendly threat is the only thing that may keep you alive...
if you need a bonus, and you cant possibly hold it...putting all the guys in one spot and threatening total annhiliation if someone breaks it may be the only way you stay in a game and win...
since I have at least one of these wins under my belt...one from a position of being dead last in the game, ...i see no problem with it at all...in the right circumstances...
this is a psychological game, and getting others not to attack you is the only real way to win.
now with duggy, his threats often got him the exact opposite response...so you have to becareful how you approach them...
it only becomes cheating, if one player is repeatedly doing it for the obvious gain of another in many games....then its a different situation all together...
in any case...if not handled properly, it may warrant feedback...so again...caution is urged
I feel threatened when MR AAFitz just joins my games.
AAFitz wrote:in some situations a nice little friendly threat is the only thing that may keep you alive...
if you need a bonus, and you cant possibly hold it...putting all the guys in one spot and threatening total annhiliation if someone breaks it may be the only way you stay in a game and win...
since I have at least one of these wins under my belt...one from a position of being dead last in the game, ...i see no problem with it at all...in the right circumstances...
this is a psychological game, and getting others not to attack you is the only real way to win.
now with duggy, his threats often got him the exact opposite response...so you have to becareful how you approach them...
it only becomes cheating, if one player is repeatedly doing it for the obvious gain of another in many games....then its a different situation all together...
in any case...if not handled properly, it may warrant feedback...so again...caution is urged
You're right about phsycological, even when you attack you have to beware of revenge attacks, and havn't you also revenge attacked, I have, for no other reason than I want to hurt someone who hurt me.A big part of CC is about mind games. thats why it's so interesting.
