Communism sucks

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
browng-08
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:46 pm

Post by browng-08 »

French Canada is the region where the majority of french-speaking Canadians live, ie Quebec. There are also pockets in Manitoba, and atlantic provinces.
User avatar
jiminski
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 3:30 pm
Gender: Female
Location: London

Post by jiminski »

Der Fuhrer wrote:
jiminski wrote:Are you French Canadian?


What's a 'French-Canadian'?


Hey calm down buddy! i am only trying to help you save a little face.. what with your having been intellectually destroyed by a guy in a language not of his birth...
If you were 'French Canadian' speak french at home and in your commune... at least you start from an even-ish footing.
If not, how embarrassing for you.
User avatar
ignotus
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.
Contact:

Post by ignotus »

Der Fuhrer wrote:
No one can be this stupid. With this post, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a commie-pinko commie libtard.

From the beginning of the 20th century until the 1970s, the French Revolution was most commonly described as the result of the growing economic and social importance of the bourgeoisie, or middle class. The bourgeoisie, it was believed, overthrew the Old Regime because that regime had given power and privilege to other classes—the nobility and the clergy—who prevented the bourgeoisie from advancing socially and politically. Recently this interpretation has been replaced by one that relies less on social and economic factors and more on political ones. Economic recession in the 1770s may have frustrated some bourgeois in their rise to power and wealth, and rising bread prices just before the Revolution certainly increased discontent among workers and peasants. Yet it is now commonly believed that the revolutionary process started with a crisis in the French state.

By 1789 many French people had become critical of the monarchy, even though it had been largely successful in militarily defending France and in quelling domestic religious and political violence. They resented the rising and unequal taxes, the persecution of religious minorities, and government interference in their private lives. These resentments, coupled with an inefficient government and an antiquated legal system, made the government seem increasingly illegitimate to the French people. The royal court at Versailles, which had been developed to impress the French people and Europe generally, came to symbolize the waste and corruption of the entire Old Regime.


I absolutely abhor fucking morons. The entire revolution was against the monarchy. It had nothing to do with a battle between the rich and poor.

So the whole thing (French revolution) was just a battle against the monarchy? Not likely! I could put some 50 random quotes right now but I will point a flaw in this perception by pointing to two facts:

1) Revolution started in mid 1789, but they executed king (Luis XVI) in 1793. And National Convention sentenced him to death with only a few votes more (in favor of his death). Why didn't they killed the king earlier if the people hated him that much (he was in Paris most of that time)?

2) Revolution started in mid 1789, but the republic was declared only in mid 1792. So if monarchy was so bad for the people why did they wait three years to declare a republic?


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Last edited by ignotus on Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
browng-08
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:46 pm

Post by browng-08 »

Der Fuhrer wrote:
browng-08 wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote: I pwn a fucker, yet all that concerns you would be my text colour? I did not forget my text colour. I forgot to bold the most-important components of my source information, that you moronic liberals may better understand my obviously superior knowledge.

How did you 'pwn' me (pwn, really? go back to counter strike, dipshit), by not understanding my post?


Counter Strike? WTF? No matter. Nice backpedal by the way.


wikipedia wrote:Pwn is a slang term that implies domination or humiliation of a rival, used primarily in the Internet gaming culture to taunt an opponent that has just been soundly defeated. For example: I pwn noobs on halo 3.

There you go.
Der Fuhrer
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:35 am

Post by Der Fuhrer »

ignotus wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
No one can be this stupid. With this post, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a commie-pinko commie libtard.

From the beginning of the 20th century until the 1970s, the French Revolution was most commonly described as the result of the growing economic and social importance of the bourgeoisie, or middle class. The bourgeoisie, it was believed, overthrew the Old Regime because that regime had given power and privilege to other classes—the nobility and the clergy—who prevented the bourgeoisie from advancing socially and politically. Recently this interpretation has been replaced by one that relies less on social and economic factors and more on political ones. Economic recession in the 1770s may have frustrated some bourgeois in their rise to power and wealth, and rising bread prices just before the Revolution certainly increased discontent among workers and peasants. Yet it is now commonly believed that the revolutionary process started with a crisis in the French state.

By 1789 many French people had become critical of the monarchy, even though it had been largely successful in militarily defending France and in quelling domestic religious and political violence. They resented the rising and unequal taxes, the persecution of religious minorities, and government interference in their private lives. These resentments, coupled with an inefficient government and an antiquated legal system, made the government seem increasingly illegitimate to the French people. The royal court at Versailles, which had been developed to impress the French people and Europe generally, came to symbolize the waste and corruption of the entire Old Regime.


I absolutely abhor fucking morons. The entire revolution was against the monarchy. It had nothing to do with a battle between the rich and poor.

So the whole thing (French revolution) was just a battle against the monarchy? Not likely! I could put some 50 random quotes right now but I will point a flaw in this perception by pointing to two facts?

1) Revolution started in mid 1789, but they executed king (Luis XVI) in 1793. And National Convention sentenced him to death with only a few votes more (in favor of his death). Why didn't they killed the king earlier if the people hated him that much (he was in Paris most of that time)?

2) Revolution started in mid 1789, but the republic was declared only in mid 1792. So if monarchy was so bad for the people why did they wait three years to declare republic?


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


The Russian Revolution started long before 1917, yet the Soviet Union came to be only in 1922. That's 5 years. WTF?

The National Convention
National Convention (France), representative assembly convened (September 1792) during the French Revolution. It abolished the monarchy, established the First Republic, and condemned (January 1793) King Louis XVI to death for treason. During the Reign of Terror (April 1793-July 1794), the convention was dominated by the 12-member Committee of Public Safety and thereafter by the Thermidorian faction. The convention was dissolved October 26, 1795, after the establishment of the Directory.


You are complaining that the French did not murder the French king early enough? WTF? If the Revolution was not against the monarchy, something you dispute, why bother executing him at all? Clearly, no one can be this stupid.
User avatar
ignotus
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.
Contact:

Post by ignotus »

I'm not gonna waste my time on you Die Fuhrers wannabe Nazi idiot.
You (obviously) just came to this forum to make people argue with you and I'm not going to give you that pleasure any more.

Image


Oh, and you really should read some books.
I mean real books, not comic books.
Last edited by ignotus on Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Post by got tonkaed »

i like the girls chances in that one really, she looks pissed.
User avatar
ignotus
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.
Contact:

Post by ignotus »

got tonkaed wrote:i like the girls chances in that one really, she looks pissed.

:roll:


:lol:
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
browng-08
Posts: 1538
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:46 pm

Post by browng-08 »

I bet the horse uses red text. He'll win.
User avatar
ignotus
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.
Contact:

Post by ignotus »

browng-08 wrote:I bet the horse uses red text. He'll win.

:roll:


:wink:
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
Bavarian Raven
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:52 pm
Location: Canada, Vancouver

Post by Bavarian Raven »

this is just getting sad....
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

no. now its sad.
Norse wrote: But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Post by Snorri1234 »

Image

How about now?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

browng-08 wrote:
Der Fuhrer wrote:
jiminski wrote:Are you French Canadian?


What's a 'French-Canadian'?
Means from Quebec.


Vive le Québec libre.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Guiscard
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Post by Guiscard »

Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Iliad
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Re: Communism sucks

Post by Iliad »

jay_a2j wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:So I read about Communism in school yesterday, and I think it's the most retarded idea I've ever heard of. I go to work but then pay my dumb neighbour most of my money, because he's too stupid/lazy to work, wtf?!

I see a lot of people around here saying that communism/socialism isn't that bad. But how can you even be serious? It's just like being robbed every day.

Am I missing something, or is communism just the most retarded thing to ever grace the planet.




I agree, vote Ron Paul!
SHUT THE f*ck UP!!!


Seriously everyone hates Ron now and everyone hates YOU. Stop trying to thread jack every thread possible! Just shut up! You're wasting your time here!
User avatar
ignotus
Posts: 2766
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 9:34 am
Location: Hanging on to my old avatar.
Contact:

Post by ignotus »

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?



No! :?
heavycola wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Man, this thread was great. A whopping 230 pages with noone changing their viewpoint.
I actually converted around page 198. Unfortunately, I converted to satanism.
User avatar
Norse
Posts: 4227
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:14 pm
Location: Cradled in the arms of Freya.

Post by Norse »

I really did try to find the irony here. The only Irony I found, was that it was ironically not ironic, thus being ironic in a non-ironic sense.

But, this is all jibber-jabber to most of you half-wits, as the grand majority of you unwashed fools think that the word "Irony" is a noun relating to ferrous metals.
b.k. barunt wrote:Snorri's like one of those fufu dogs who get all excited and dance around pissing on themself.
suggs wrote:scared off by all the pervs and wankers already? No? Then let me introduce myself, I'm Mr Pervy Wank.
User avatar
Dancing Mustard
Posts: 5442
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Pushing Buttons

Post by Dancing Mustard »

ignotus wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No! :?

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
User avatar
Neutrino
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Post by Neutrino »

Very nice 5000th post, Mustard.

Teach those actively stupid communists what for!
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Guiscard
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Post by Guiscard »

Dancing Mustard wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No! :?

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.


And confirmation. :D
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
btownmeggy
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Post by btownmeggy »

Dancing Mustard wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No! :?

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.


This post may be worthy of me finally creating a signature.
User avatar
btownmeggy
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Post by btownmeggy »

btownmeggy wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No! :?

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.


This post may be worthy of me finally creating a signature.


Even if he his joking, it's a good one.

Ta-da!

|
|
V
User avatar
heavycola
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Post by heavycola »

btownmeggy wrote:
btownmeggy wrote:
Dancing Mustard wrote:
ignotus wrote:
Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No! :?

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.


This post may be worthy of me finally creating a signature.


Even if he his joking, it's a good one.

Ta-da!

|
|
V


It's certainly worthy. not sure about the ellpisis though...
Image
User avatar
Herakilla
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

Post by Herakilla »

i stopped reading on page 4 when a huge quote train appeared but communism basically takes away all identity of the individual people. you only work for the benefit of the country, like a giant colony of ants. you work will you die and someone else replaces you.

and with no benefits people tend to become lazy, the USSR had the heaviest car engines in the world because they were weighted to more easily make quotas
Come join us in Live Chat!
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”