2 votes and someone intentionally voted iliad to spite me. Obviously you are all out to get me. Well go ahead *Draws sword*. Come get me, I could easily take on each one of you.
Vote fir Just so I can avoid the OMGus vote.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:2 votes and someone intentionally voted iliad to spite me. Obviously you are all out to get me. Well go ahead *Draws sword*. Come get me, I could easily take on each one of you.
Vote fir Just so I can avoid the OMGus vote.
He has bared steel. He clearly intends to slay us all! Unvote Vote strike wolf
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
strike wolf wrote:2 votes and someone intentionally voted iliad to spite me. Obviously you are all out to get me. Well go ahead *Draws sword*. Come get me, I could easily take on each one of you.
Vote fir Just so I can avoid the OMGus vote.
He has bared steel. He clearly intends to slay us all! Unvote Vote strike wolf
What were you expecting him to do? Just to lie back and take it like some exiled princess?
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
I have no idea what my WC let me check, unvote vote safariguy5 because his name is in yellow.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
I have no idea what my WC let me check, unvote vote safariguy5 because his name is in yellow.
Perhaps none of us know our win condition!
Honestly, though, do you really expect an answer to that question, spiesr?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
I don't want to be the busy body here, but it states this in the rules
Commander9 wrote:3. Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities. Do *not* claim your victory conditions. This is a serious offence and could earn you a mod-kill, and/or a blacklist from future games.
Commander can affirm what I'm saying, whether it's true or not but until then I say we drop the victory con talking
Vote: Mandy Eddie35: hi everyone Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
I don't want to be the busy body here, but it states this in the rules
Commander9 wrote:3. Do not quote any PM's you receive from the moderator or another player. You may say your name, role, associated abilities. Do *not* claim your victory conditions. This is a serious offence and could earn you a mod-kill, and/or a blacklist from future games.
Commander can affirm what I'm saying, whether it's true or not but until then I say we drop the victory con talking
I think that would be best. As much as we'd like a blood bath, we don't want you to break the game. This rule has been the largest point of discussion between Commander and me and we want you to adhere to it.
The Weird One wrote:Honestly, though, do you really expect an answer to that question, spiesr?
No, his post was obviously a joke. I will however be keeping it in the back of my mind when evaluating Jonty's actions going forward. Also, it wasn't so much a question as an accusation.
I've been away all weekend and am just catching up but it looks like there is sweet f all to catch up on bar a no lynch post which I am going to assume is a joke. In absence of better leads vote stays on fircoal.
nagerous wrote:I've been away all weekend and am just catching up but it looks like there is sweet f all to catch up on bar a no lynch post which I am going to assume is a joke. In absence of better leads vote stays on fircoal.
Really, though, are there ever any leads better than fircoal being in the game?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Good to know...And bugger, at the same time...there goes my suspicion.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Yeah I lack creativity, but a FOS, harsh.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
Basically, what aage said. Victory conditions is a no-no. That may change with other games in the series, but definitely not this one. Anyways, as of now, there's a *soft* deadline for the coming Sunday. If the game/activity will pick up and we'll be getting there, just make a request and we can easily extend the deadline.
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Yeah I lack creativity, but a FOS, harsh.
I wasn't FOSing you.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
jonty125 wrote:vote no lynch why can't we just live in peace?
So, is this a slip to us that your victory condition doesn't require anyone to be eliminated? So like survivor or something? *Note: The above statement(s) is about half serious.
FOS Spiesr. You've been in enough games with Jonty to realize that voting no lynch is currently a staple of his joke vote activities, whether he is scum, town or 3rd party. Really not worth investigating.
Yeah I lack creativity, but a FOS, harsh.
I wasn't FOSing you.
I know. In hindsight, I didn't make that clear.
War doesn't determine who's right; it determines who's left.
Okay, I've been sitting back trying to get a read on anyone doing anything odd. I saw Jonty's "no lynch" vote as what it was...jokey. Spiesr was only slightly odd for pointing it out semi-seriously...the odd part being that I didn't think Jonty was at all serious, so why would Spiesr be semi-serious?
I was actually sad to see Jonty pull his vote so quickly after Spiesr semi-called him out. I was hoping to see who else took the bait and ran with it. I can only figure that Jonty got a little spooked that he might actually draw more attention to himself than he wanted too...which is also slightly odd, but I can pass for now, given the complexity of this game and all its levels of win conditions.
I have to say, the no lynch jokevote is pretty obvious a joke to me. Reading any more deeply into it would be a waste of time IMHO.
Incidentally, I get the feeling allegiances will probably change in the course of the game, could make it difficult to pin down whether someone's claim is town or not.