Adult diapers for older people who can't make it to the bathroom.iAmCaffeine wrote:what is a depends
Moderator: Clan Directors
Adult diapers for older people who can't make it to the bathroom.iAmCaffeine wrote:what is a depends









Yeah, I kept things (mostly) the same for this event. Definitely open to changes in the future. Thanks for the feedbackmdhill wrote:As RL winds down (well-fought, all!), we have a suggestion for future Random Leagues.
The MVP threshold is currently set at half the maximum games (22 games this year). In our clan, we try to balance games pretty evenly among participating players (especially in Random League), and there are presumably other clans who assign similarly. As a result, we only had one member who had more than the minimum requirement of 22 games and only 7 that were at that minimum. This means, for example, that Bariclaw, who will have won an amazing 91% of his 21 games (one short of the minimum), doesn't qualify for the MVP. We had similarly few qualifiers last year for the same reason.
We would suggest that for future Random Leagues, the minimum to qualify for MVP be reduced or even eliminated (since, presumably, clans will not name an MVP that only played in 3 games or something). The rules are set for this year, and we'll select a non-Bari MVP (also very deserving!) accordingly, but we want to put the issue on the agenda for consideration for next year.


I haven’t looked at their record (or others records) yet because it’s not completed. There used to be a formula that was widely used. If it’s literally off by one, I know things used to be given exceptions and I wouldn’t be opposed to looking into it once this completeselddir wrote:I would like to push for this to be changed this year.
Bariclaw's performance and results were amazing, and he was the MVP. Being short by 1 isn't his fault, it's on us as leaders.
Additionally, I personally think the minimum is ridiculous and needs to be lowered (by a lot) or removed. As I understand things, the winning clan picks the MVP from within the clan - there are no cases where the minimum is necessary or relevant. No clan would pick a player that played in like 3 games.


I went through all the matches, looks like all can be called except for 3 matches. Waiting on results for:elddir wrote:awesome. sounds like we can cross that bridge when we get there.


IcePack wrote:I haven’t looked at their record (or others records) yet because it’s not completed. There used to be a formula that was widely used. If it’s literally off by one, I know things used to be given exceptions and I wouldn’t be opposed to looking into it once this completeselddir wrote:I would like to push for this to be changed this year.
Bariclaw's performance and results were amazing, and he was the MVP. Being short by 1 isn't his fault, it's on us as leaders.
Additionally, I personally think the minimum is ridiculous and needs to be lowered (by a lot) or removed. As I understand things, the winning clan picks the MVP from within the clan - there are no cases where the minimum is necessary or relevant. No clan would pick a player that played in like 3 games.
Keep in mind I haven't looked at anyone elses records, so i'm not sure if theres other strong candidates but just briefly looking at this based on historical stuff and the info I see at a glance:elddir wrote:awesome. sounds like we can cross that bridge when we get there.


These folks obviously need to move up a division.groovysmurf wrote:Bariclaw the "GOAT" - 21 games - 90.5%
Dufus Pooptypants - 22 games - 86.4%
Ferris Wheels - 22 games - 81.8%
Fyrdraca - 21 games - 81%
SaviorShot - 20 games - 80%
mookiemcgee - 22 games - 77.3%
elddir - 23 games - 73.9%






