Moderator: Community Team

dang...you caught me...shieldgenerator7 wrote:I don't remember there being any heat on dazza. I doubt the vig would've shot last night unless he was a n00b who didn't know not to shoot N1, was overeager vig, or was a veteran who had a pretty good idea that dazza was mafia. Either that or we have a busdriver, but the scene doesn't say much about a busdriver. If it's the vig, I'm guessing he's new to his role. I think it points to more of an SK (this is WWII, what could an SK do with a knife in a gun fight?), and with a game this size it wouldn't surprise me. It's possible it was the vig, but I'm guessing SK. Is S7C here? I think it's him.
-SG7 ()

Why are you so eager to get someone else to lead a case with info?chapcrap wrote: I feel like someone should have some information to lead some kind of case with...
The only nomination for / was by leehar for apparently submarining./ wrote:My top three, by suspicion would include jak, because frankly I don't believe his claimed name or special ability, but I will leave him redacted from the list because it is the type of thing that needs later confirmation and definitely not a lynch at this point.
The true three would be
Jgordon, obviously, I still believe the most info can be gained from his death, and it is possible he is scum, if not now we will probably lose him through the cracks until endgame, and be in a situation similar to what PMC described.
everywhere116, doesn't really contribute much beyond the occasional quip, his last serious vote, as I have noted panned out poorly, and wasn't thought through seemingly.
Safari, I find it odd to pressure the replacement like that out of nowhere, there are cases abound that will actually generate data because there have been tons of posts, I wonder if there is a reason he wants to detract from them and on to a completely random case on someone with no in game posts, besides supposedly not reading fast enough. One would think someone so read up would have an actual case by P.50
newguy narrowly is bumped down to fourth, for the reasons I mentioned a few pages back, and possibly for trying to prematurely put that line to bed. (ie: saying in advance "that's all I have to say" then literally not responding further, moving on to the definition of "OMGUS")
Leading a case with information you have doesn't mean you have to reveal your information. I just have no case to lead at the moment.Leehar wrote:Why are you so eager to get someone else to lead a case with info?chapcrap wrote: I feel like someone should have some information to lead some kind of case with...
Vote Chap because it seems like scummy intel gathering you just wanted to slip in there to get people to exposed themselves needlessly
A shady character like chap? What does that even mean?jak111 wrote:Saf seems legit for today still. However, I'd like the Chap case to resurface because I feel there's a LOT to be gained from him.
~ He's over eager to get information.
~ He doesn't want that information to be from him.
~ He has a cocky attitude of 'I won't be lynched, town won't lynch me'
~ He was one of the top choices, oddly enough everyone bugged off from him when he was throwing accusations out yet not being able to take any pressure from JG and I.
~ He expects cases made for him.
~ He's in general inactive unless he's making excuses, asking others to make a case, or trying to seem active to subside pressure on him.
Really, there's much potential of outting whatever chap is, because he seems over eager for others to make cases for him to follow like a sheep. Yet whenever a case is made on him he comes up with excuses, not really a guy I want/need if it comes down to only a few townies versus a few mafia. Because by then we'd need everyone's participation and he doesn't seem that eager to get his hands dirty for the pay off it could receive. Is a shady character like Chap really someone anyone here wants to take into the final few days?
Or I am exactly what I say I am. Just a VT.DoomYoshi wrote:My thoughts on safari are largely the same as they were yesterday. We haven't had a cop come forth yet, so either the cop was roleblocked, didn't target saf or saf is a godfather.
If the BW will lean chap's way, I am fine with pressuring him for a claim.

well this could all be leading to the battle of the bulge like the one final battle ...just a thoughtsafariguy5 wrote:Or I am exactly what I say I am. Just a VT.DoomYoshi wrote:My thoughts on safari are largely the same as they were yesterday. We haven't had a cop come forth yet, so either the cop was roleblocked, didn't target saf or saf is a godfather.
If the BW will lean chap's way, I am fine with pressuring him for a claim.
Full disclosure here, if you go and look at when my character died, he passed away before the Battle of the Bulge occurred. Dunno if the mod was running low on characters, but we may not be able to assume all characters in this game were both alive and present around the time of this battle.
EBWOPSome7hingCLEVER wrote:well this could all be leading to the battle of the bulge like the one final battle ...just a thoughtsafariguy5 wrote:Or I am exactly what I say I am. Just a VT.DoomYoshi wrote:My thoughts on safari are largely the same as they were yesterday. We haven't had a cop come forth yet, so either the cop was roleblocked, didn't target saf or saf is a godfather.
If the BW will lean chap's way, I am fine with pressuring him for a claim.
Full disclosure here, if you go and look at when my character died, he passed away before the Battle of the Bulge occurred. Dunno if the mod was running low on characters, but we may not be able to assume all characters in this game were both alive and present around the time of this battle.
I said yesterday that lynching him if we don't have anyone else would be ok. This is because first, it's just hard to buy a General being a VT. It may be more believable after the Brig was a VT. Second, because as jg already pointed out, that person wasn't even at the battle or in Europe. And saf himself just pointed out that the person was already dead by the battle. So, I would think that many other general or characters could have been substituted for a VT instead of one that doesn't even fit in the battle.pmchugh wrote:Hmm to re target my earlier question, chap what do you make of safari's claim?
I'm interested chap, what are you to be soo sure that every role has to fit your idea of how the mod set it up?chapcrap wrote:I said yesterday that lynching him if we don't have anyone else would be ok. This is because first, it's just hard to buy a General being a VT. It may be more believable after the Brig was a VT. Second, because as jg already pointed out, that person wasn't even at the battle or in Europe. And saf himself just pointed out that the person was already dead by the battle. So, I would think that many other general or characters could have been substituted for a VT instead of one that doesn't even fit in the battle.pmchugh wrote:Hmm to re target my earlier question, chap what do you make of safari's claim?
Bottom line: not that believable.
Are you asking what I am?jak111 wrote:I'm interested chap, what are you to be soo sure that every role has to fit your idea of how the mod set it up?chapcrap wrote:I said yesterday that lynching him if we don't have anyone else would be ok. This is because first, it's just hard to buy a General being a VT. It may be more believable after the Brig was a VT. Second, because as jg already pointed out, that person wasn't even at the battle or in Europe. And saf himself just pointed out that the person was already dead by the battle. So, I would think that many other general or characters could have been substituted for a VT instead of one that doesn't even fit in the battle.pmchugh wrote:Hmm to re target my earlier question, chap what do you make of safari's claim?
Bottom line: not that believable.
No, I'm asking what colour the sky is.. of course I'm asking what are you. We can do this the easy way or the hard way, preferably the easy since you are so sure of yourself. I don't care for a role at the moment, but what is your name if you're soo certain on who should and should not be in the game?chapcrap wrote:Are you asking what I am?jak111 wrote:I'm interested chap, what are you to be soo sure that every role has to fit your idea of how the mod set it up?chapcrap wrote:I said yesterday that lynching him if we don't have anyone else would be ok. This is because first, it's just hard to buy a General being a VT. It may be more believable after the Brig was a VT. Second, because as jg already pointed out, that person wasn't even at the battle or in Europe. And saf himself just pointed out that the person was already dead by the battle. So, I would think that many other general or characters could have been substituted for a VT instead of one that doesn't even fit in the battle.pmchugh wrote:Hmm to re target my earlier question, chap what do you make of safari's claim?
Bottom line: not that believable.
Interesting that this is seemingly missed by most of the players, new guy and myself included.everywhere116 wrote:Well, we could look at the list from yesterday. The highest was safari, but we already got a claim from him. Next is gordon, then new guy. I think that's as good a point as any.
Vote new guy for pressure.