Moderator: Community Team
Yeah i found them all in 3 minutes but took 10 minutes to describe it!White Buffalo wrote:I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..
in Conquer 4 it wasn't a challenge to find them, but the hard part was thinking of how to say it in an understandable way.White Buffalo wrote:I quite agree.. Trying to explain them was quite difficult..

It will help a lot thanx!!!thenobodies80 wrote:If explain the difference is really hard you can use also a screenshot for each difference. I can suggest gyazo, it allows you to click and grab just a part of the screen, in this case the part where you spot the difference
Hope it helps.
About the difficulty, the two final rounds will be a bit more harder![]()
Nobodies
CJ Lues wrote:I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!

well, if you want to play a game were the organizer just changes a pixel we will let you have fun on your own. this is a game to spot differences with your natural eye, not with photoshop overlapping images or whatever multiple things the technology offers.DiM wrote:CJ Lues wrote:I have 15/15 and plan to go all the way!
except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.
it's not a competition if everybody winsbetiko wrote:I ll be more than happy if we are plenty to find the 25, it seems like a problem for you!
I know my eyes aren't perfect, but at classic I could only find 3 and I got 4 on Italy. This one was fairly easy though.DiM wrote: except for the blind and the people that didn't participate i think everybody has 15/15. the modifications were really really easy to spot.
so again i'll have to suggest pixel size modifications unless the organizes want most of the participants tied for 1st place.

koontz1973 wrote:Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1.Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.
True about classic, always hated the way it looked but it is a step above 2.1 in a sense of that is looks like land and sea, not just coloured blobs shaped.DiM wrote:koontz1973 wrote:Some scores would be nice, but on another note, has anyone noticed Classic map is being beaten by World 2.1.Just goes to show, nice graphics do not make the map.
i agree that nice graphics don't make a map but i'm lost as to which one of them has nice graphics because they're both absolutely bland and simple. in fact classic actually looks very blurry to me so i'd put world 2.1 a little in front in the graphics race.

this just proves that it s perception... for me it was the easiest of all. italy took me more time to finish than (classic+conquerman)X2.Rodion wrote:Conquer 4 was overwhelmingly harder than the other 2 combined, but I should be 15/15 as of now!

drunkmonkey wrote:There were 5 changes, not 6. If you count that one as 2 different changes, then there's another one you have to count as 6 different changes. You're just upset because you missed one, and looking for someone to blame.

Now that time has expired for the map, I can tell you I wasn't referring to the dots. I was referring to the row numbers. You could say the 1 was changed to a 6, the 2 was changed to a 5, 3 to a 4, etc., for all 6.danfrank wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:There were 5 changes, not 6. If you count that one as 2 different changes, then there's another one you have to count as 6 different changes. You're just upset because you missed one, and looking for someone to blame.
actually not the equals 4 stands alone the equals 6 bonus with the dots modified also stands alone to suggest that would count as six is ignorant.. if CONTROVERSY WASN`T INTENDEDthan changing only 1 equal 4 would have been sufficient..
