Grammar and Spelling Nazis- UNITE!

Mr_Adams · Post by **Mr_Adams** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:45 am

Ya, I'm only 15. Never been drunk!

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:52 am

Mr_Adams wrote:Ya, I'm only 15. Never been drunk!

I started drinking when I was twelve... But that's a completely different issue. And don't give me this "I'm only 15" bullshit, 'cause I don't really care. In the slightest.

Mr_Adams · Post by **Mr_Adams** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:58 am

well gosh! someone's in a bad mood! Twelve? your parents must have been uncaring.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:11 am

Mr_Adams wrote:well gosh! someone's in a bad mood! Twelve? your parents must have been uncaring.

No shit I'm in a bad mood, it's bloody 4 'o clock in the morning. And yes, Twelve. And no, they weren't "uncaring", they just thought that they would teach me responsible drinking BEFORE I went and got my drivers licence, and BEFORE I turned 19 and went to the bar to get shit faced with my friends. Now I know my limit, and that "Hey, after X beers, I shouldn't even walk, let alone drive..." or "Hey, after Y beers, I'll be so wasted I'll be fucking dead! I better stop at X-Z so I'll still be able to find my way home..." Understand? O, I'm also French.

PinkyAndTheBrain · Post by **PinkyAndTheBrain** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:29 am

Mr_Adams,you're in Honors English?

:shock:

Kinnison · Post by **Kinnison** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:00 am

Anarkistsdream wrote:I would like to call out to all of us who are anal retentive about our grammar and spelling. Who feel the need to correct friends, family, and internet morons when they sound pseudo-intellectual because they don't now what the hell they are talking about.

All those in favor, say "Aye!"

PS3, I'll let you in, but you have a certain bias against you already, as most of your posts in the Clubhouse have been ridiculous and fell of inconsistencies.

1: PS3, I'll let you in, but you have a certain bias against you already, as most of your posts in the Clubhouse have been ridiculous and full of inconsistencies.

2: Aye.

3: The cake is a lie.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:15 am

Mr_Adams wrote:Ya, I'm only 15. Never been drunk!

And they've brainwashed you early*, it seems.

* Reference to other threads.

CrabNebula · Post by **CrabNebula** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:05 am

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:28 pm

Mr_Adams wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:HAHAHAHA your such a freaking Hypocrite!!! you spelt "know" "now". What a moron!

Flame me again, and you'll be banned. Have a nice day.

(If you'ld like me to show you how much of a fucking dumbass you are, please go to FW)

"you'ld"
"you'd"

You are incorrect... Plain and simple... Have a nice day.

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:34 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:HAHAHAHA your such a freaking Hypocrite!!! you spelt "know" "now". What a moron!

Flame me again, and you'll be banned. Have a nice day.

(If you'ld like me to show you how much of a fucking dumbass you are, please go to FW)

"you'ld"
"you'd"

You are incorrect... Plain and simple... Have a nice day.

Well, from what I was able to find, Adam is correct.
http://www.edufind.com/english/grammar/IF4.cfm
http://www.udel.edu/eli/questions/g17.html

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:46 pm

The OED cites several examples as 'ld as a contraction for would, all dating before 1700.

So, regardless of whether it is in current parlance, it is indeed correct, though out-dated.

And just call me old-fashioned... :wink:

Oh, and after THIS THREAD: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... sc&start=0

you have no right to correct anything.

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:50 pm

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:21 pm

Mr_Adams wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:HAHAHAHA your such a freaking Hypocrite!!! you spelt "know" "now". What a moron!

Flame me again, and you'll be banned. Have a nice day.

(If you'ld like me to show you how much of a fucking dumbass you are, please go to FW)

"you'ld"
"you'd"

Mr_Adams wrote:so none of you have loyalty to the man who makes this sight possible? you discust me.

Strife · Post by **Strife** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:24 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:HAHAHAHA your such a freaking Hypocrite!!! you spelt "know" "now". What a moron!

Flame me again, and you'll be banned. Have a nice day.

(If you'ld like me to show you how much of a fucking dumbass you are, please go to FW)

"you'ld"
"you'd"
Mr_Adams wrote:so none of you have loyalty to the man who makes this sight possible? you discust me.

Wow, just wow...

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:24 pm

Is this thing official yet?

hecter · Post by **hecter** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 6:25 pm

I'm guessing what he was saying was we were not loyal to lackattack, right? 'Cause, you know, he's not exactly a God, just a computer programmer... Anyway, what does that have to do with anything?

Mr_Adams · Post by **Mr_Adams** » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:05 pm

0ojakeo0 wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Anarkistsdream wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:HAHAHAHA your such a freaking Hypocrite!!! you spelt "know" "now". What a moron!

Flame me again, and you'll be banned. Have a nice day.

(If you'ld like me to show you how much of a fucking dumbass you are, please go to FW)

"you'ld"
"you'd"
Mr_Adams wrote:so none of you have loyalty to the man who makes this sight possible? you discust me.

You dragged the second quote to another forum? :lol:

nobody understands my sense of humor (My vote goes to Optimusprime)

lalaland · Post by **lalaland** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:29 pm

This seems far too long of a time for the e-ticket. What happened?

jcalebmoore · Post by **jcalebmoore** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:37 pm

Anarkistsdream wrote:
PS3, I'll let you in, but you have a certain bias against you already, as most of your posts in the Clubhouse have been ridiculous and fell of inconsistencies.

I'm assuming you meant full there, for the record. I'm in. Not that anyone probably cares about my whole five posts, but I'm feeling a burst of loquaciousness coming on, and I'll see to my proper use of the language.

Anarkistsdream · Post by **Anarkistsdream** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:39 pm

lalaland wrote:This seems far too long of a time for the e-ticket. What happened?

Have you started a clan yet?

I have... And this is how long it took.

When this one receives news, I'll post it... Chill. No sweat.

As for jcalebmoore, I dig the Christian Bale avvy... Definitely in, mate.

jcalebmoore · Post by **jcalebmoore** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:01 pm

Thanks much, and sorry i missed the previous kinnison post about that error.

(By the way, is there any chance i can get some e.e. cummings-esque artistic license so i don't have to capitalize my i's? Or am i going to have to man up and reach for the shift key?)

The Weird One · Post by **The Weird One** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:08 pm

You'll have to reach the shift key. I still manage without mine working.

Kinnison · Post by **Kinnison** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:43 pm

jcalebmoore wrote:Thanks much, and sorry i missed the previous kinnison post about that error.

(By the way, is there any chance i can get some e.e. cummings-esque artistic license so i don't have to capitalize my i's? Or am i going to have to man up and reach for the shift key?)

Given that you manage to capitalize other letters, I'm afraid you're going to have to resort to a very, VERY old technique. It was known to ancient cultures by the cabalistic and mystical name of... 'proofreading'.

:lol:

jcalebmoore · Post by **jcalebmoore** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:54 pm

Kinnison wrote:
jcalebmoore wrote:Thanks much, and sorry i missed the previous kinnison post about that error.

(By the way, is there any chance i can get some e.e. cummings-esque artistic license so i don't have to capitalize my i's? Or am i going to have to man up and reach for the shift key?)

Given that you manage to capitalize other letters, I'm afraid you're going to have to resort to a very, VERY old technique. It was known to ancient cultures by the cabalistic and mystical name of... 'proofreading'.

It's not that I miss the 'I's'. It's not that it's too much effort. I just try to pretend that I'm some kind of unique and beautiful poet that is portraying my understanding of my own insignificance in a stunning tribute to a great poet. I realize however, that I suck and am just going to have to follow the rules and stop being a prick. I'll stop pretending I'm special now. Sorry.

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:15 pm

Kinnison wrote:
jcalebmoore wrote:
Thanks much, and sorry i missed the previous kinnison post about that error.

(By the way, is there any chance i can get some e.e. cummings-esque artistic license so i don't have to capitalize my i's? Or am i going to have to man up and reach for the shift key?)

Given that you manage to capitalize other letters, I'm afraid you're going to have to resort to a very, VERY old technique. It was known to ancient cultures by the cabalistic and mystical name of... 'proofreading'.

Laughing

It's not that I miss the 'I's'. It's not that it's too much effort. I just try to pretend that I'm some kind of unique and beautiful poet that is portraying my understanding of my own insignificance in a stunning tribute to a great poet. I realize however, that I suck and am just going to have to follow the rules and stop being a prick. I'll stop pretending I'm special now. Sorry.

No, I get it man... the "i's" are lower case because you're trying to show humility; you're trying to downplay the ego. I get it man; deep, very deep.

Grammar and Spelling Nazis- UNITE!

Re: Grammar and Spelling Nazis- UNTIE!

Re: Grammar and Spelling Nazis- UNITE!