Can't say it was worth while, next time I want to wade through some waist high shit I'll just take a quick jaunt through the nearest sewer!
EDIT: And there is still no sign of mrswkd!
Moderator: Community Team
Exactly. Hence adaptation occurs, but not outside of kinds.chang50 wrote:I reckon he will say they all of the same 'kind'.Dukasaur wrote:If you think evolution is a hoax, then dogs can't descend from wolves. You can't have it both ways.universalchiro wrote:Go Artimis Go. I'm actually rooting for you to finish.Artimis wrote:Hurrah! Page 50 completed, Noah's Ark must have been utilising Tardis technology to pack enough food for all 100,000 animals onboard for 40 days and 40 nights. Also Noah and his family were the very model of time and motion efficiency when it came to distributing the food and then removing the resultant crap afterwards.
Your number of 100,000 animals on board the Ark, seems really high. Take dogs for example, if there are approximately 1,000 species of dog and all dogs are descendants of the wolf, wouldn't Noah just need a male and female wolf? Seems sufficient to me.
The Bible uses the word "kind", one male and one female of every kind. Mankind breaks kinds into different categories. So I'm thinking a "Kind" would be closer to a Kingdom classification.
I don't know about this, where is the river sediment value in this argument of yours, UC?universalchiro wrote:Exactly. Hence adaptation occurs, but not outside of kinds.chang50 wrote:I reckon he will say they all of the same 'kind'.Dukasaur wrote:If you think evolution is a hoax, then dogs can't descend from wolves. You can't have it both ways.universalchiro wrote:Go Artimis Go. I'm actually rooting for you to finish.Artimis wrote:Hurrah! Page 50 completed, Noah's Ark must have been utilising Tardis technology to pack enough food for all 100,000 animals onboard for 40 days and 40 nights. Also Noah and his family were the very model of time and motion efficiency when it came to distributing the food and then removing the resultant crap afterwards.
Your number of 100,000 animals on board the Ark, seems really high. Take dogs for example, if there are approximately 1,000 species of dog and all dogs are descendants of the wolf, wouldn't Noah just need a male and female wolf? Seems sufficient to me.
The Bible uses the word "kind", one male and one female of every kind. Mankind breaks kinds into different categories. So I'm thinking a "Kind" would be closer to a Kingdom classification.
The sediment adapted to the ocean floor which share the same kind.AndyDufresne wrote:I don't know about this, where is the river sediment value in this argument of yours, UC?universalchiro wrote:Exactly. Hence adaptation occurs, but not outside of kinds.chang50 wrote:I reckon he will say they all of the same 'kind'.Dukasaur wrote:If you think evolution is a hoax, then dogs can't descend from wolves. You can't have it both ways.universalchiro wrote:Go Artimis Go. I'm actually rooting for you to finish.Artimis wrote:Hurrah! Page 50 completed, Noah's Ark must have been utilising Tardis technology to pack enough food for all 100,000 animals onboard for 40 days and 40 nights. Also Noah and his family were the very model of time and motion efficiency when it came to distributing the food and then removing the resultant crap afterwards.
Your number of 100,000 animals on board the Ark, seems really high. Take dogs for example, if there are approximately 1,000 species of dog and all dogs are descendants of the wolf, wouldn't Noah just need a male and female wolf? Seems sufficient to me.
The Bible uses the word "kind", one male and one female of every kind. Mankind breaks kinds into different categories. So I'm thinking a "Kind" would be closer to a Kingdom classification.
--Andy
Hm, this seems plausible, but I need more evidence.BigBallinStalin wrote:
The sediment adapted to the ocean floor which share the same kind.
AndyDufresne wrote:Hm, this seems plausible, but I need more evidence.BigBallinStalin wrote:
The sediment adapted to the ocean floor which share the same kind.
--Andy

That map was made by a follower of Satan; therefore, it must be dismissed.AndyDufresne wrote:BBS, I need more evidence. Please figure out how this works into your evidence:
--Andy
Andy, may I humbly suggest that you try standing the right way up, on your feet? Or at least try aiming your body so that your head points at the sky and not the ground, instead of hanging from a tree branch by your tail.AndyDufresne wrote:BBS, I need more evidence. Please figure out how this works into your evidence:
--Andy