Moderator: Community Team
Oh for Pete's sake, just get lost, you unbelievably arrogant and snotty little man.mpjh wrote:OK, that is your belief. The point of this thread is that a poll of Christians in the U.S. supports the view that many, many Christians do not believe that.
It wasn't very professional of Nappy to use insults to justify his opinion but other than that i don't see why you can't respond to his views, other then the insults they seem perfectly justified responses, it was ok to make that point but atleast try to reply to what he said and don't stoop to "his level", but don't take it i was just talking to you, i was talking to everyone, you were just the person i saw 1st.Backglass wrote:OK, I think I have it figured out. You have very little control in your own life and/or feel highly emasculated. You have no wife/girlfriend and generally are socially retarded, burying yourself in your studies and fuming at the nightly news. You play no sports. These lengthy rants and imaginary "bitch slaps" give you a false feeling of superiority and control that you so desperately lack in your day-to-day life. You end practically every post with a victory speech of some kind proclaiming yourself the winner, the other poster the loser, and proceed to pat yourself on the back for your self-appointed genius. This last act alone reeks of immaturity and only cements my suspicion that you rarely "win" in real-life. But here, you can pretend to be a "bitch slapping" he-man who strides through the forum, proving yourself intellectually superior to all you encounter, putting down all you meet with endless insults and flushing your face with the glee of finally "winning" at something.Napoleon Ier wrote:In short, you lose, and I win. That's simple, uncontroversial fact, and the sooner you take this onboard and deal with it, the more we can avoid you getting embarrassingly bitch-slapped any further than you already have.![]()
But I am probably wrong. After all I am just a "no-nothing, wispy haired, lispy, american leftist". (and something about "bullocks" thrown in for good measure)
Now I will sit back with some popcorn for the next round between you two...and place a bet on the American.
No, you're not, as brooksie pointed out, this isn't the DPR of North Korea.mpjh wrote:No one is obliged to look past his insults to see if there is anything of value there.
Hmm. He also made a series of frankly outrageous, and downright ignorant, comments which were deftly refuted by various posters acting in concert to expose him for the charlatan he is. He then wet his pants and started flaming them, and tried to report one to the mods when he responded in kind.mpjh wrote:The OP to this thread presented professional poll results that indicate that many, many Christians are a much more tolerant and open-minded group that conventional wisdom would have us think. I find hope for a more tolerant future in that finding.
Well if you think there is nothing of value there just ignore him, he won't have anything to say then will he? I am literally a veteran here when i was making a statement in my thread about racism, i actively told people to avoid calling me like "you old racist r'tifact" or how nappy puts it "you wacist!!!!11!!!1!", never once did i ignore people on the basis of calling me a insulting, degrading word, i took the good points out of what they had to offer and debated them, showing the reason why i am not a "racist", so if i can do it by your' logic you can do it far better than me because you are undoubtably athiest and liberal (and always correct).mpjh wrote:No one is obliged to look past his insults to see if there is anything of value there.
In other words, no legal authority has the right to stop you making comments worthy of a clinically retarded ape. You will, however, refuse to not respond to any of the points made by any of the posters who disagree with you, and make repeated statements claiming to have reported for "flaming" anyone who decides to respond with a bit of force to your puerile petty aspersions and extreme rudeness, since you and goasklucy still too chicken to seriously address me and Crazy Anglican in rational debate.mpjh wrote:I am under no obligation to take nappy seriously when he insults me or other posters. I will, however, report him when he purposely acts to irritate or insult me or any other poster. I and several others have had enough of his attempts to insult people and hijack threads
Only because your' allowing yourself to get annoyed, if you can't take the heat get out, as for nappy, he just has to watch what comes out of his mouth, be the bigger person and stop this, he might be doing you a favour in helping yourself prepare for life outside the realms of the tower of babble.mpjh wrote:I am under no obligation to take nappy seriously when he insults me or other posters. I will, however, report him when he purposely acts to irritate or insult me or any other poster. I and several others have had enough of his attempts to insult people and hijack threads
I'm not sure Nappy himself knows much outside of Babble- I recently glanced town the top 10 subjects and he was the most recent post in roughly 8/10 of them- spare time much?brooksieb wrote:Only because your' allowing yourself to get annoyed, if you can't take the heat get out, as for nappy, he just has to watch what comes out of his mouth, be the bigger person and stop this, he might be doing you a favour in helping yourself prepare for life outside the realms of the tower of babble.mpjh wrote:I am under no obligation to take nappy seriously when he insults me or other posters. I will, however, report him when he purposely acts to irritate or insult me or any other poster. I and several others have had enough of his attempts to insult people and hijack threads
It's the holidays for him, he still does/is about to do higher education and if he wants to go on here and spend alot of time here he can, he might be browsing the internet while still keeping conquerclub open at the same time, he could of bought a PC game and is playing while checking to see, he could even be revising or something like that, you'll have to ask him and see.lgoasklucyl wrote:I'm not sure Nappy himself knows much outside of Babble- I recently glanced town the top 10 subjects and he was the most recent post in roughly 8/10 of them- spare time much?brooksieb wrote:Only because your' allowing yourself to get annoyed, if you can't take the heat get out, as for nappy, he just has to watch what comes out of his mouth, be the bigger person and stop this, he might be doing you a favour in helping yourself prepare for life outside the realms of the tower of babble.mpjh wrote:I am under no obligation to take nappy seriously when he insults me or other posters. I will, however, report him when he purposely acts to irritate or insult me or any other poster. I and several others have had enough of his attempts to insult people and hijack threads
Fact is MP is the OP. Anything Nappy or anything else brings to the discussion is in MPs thread- if they're going to run their mouths they are simply out of line. If they want to be obnoxious, state nonsense, and throw around random insults that do nothing but degrade intelligent conversations and debate people like crazya are capable of (someone i CAN have logical discussions with), they should start their own threads or find somewhere else to vent their teenage angst.
I'm sorry, who has written nothing but crass attempts at flames for the duration of this thread the minute his ridiculous theses that were calumnious attempts at trolling the Christians on this forum were exposed as such?mpjh wrote:thanks, I will stay. There are many people here whom I enjoy playing the game and discussing issues. Nappy will get have to learn how to act properly, or he can leave or be escorted out.
Seventy percent, that is a large number. I find it very encouraging that Americans find the road to heaven a broad once allowing for lost of non-christian traffic.In June, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life published a controversial survey in which 70 percent of Americans said that they believed religions other than theirs could lead to eternal life.
Okay, I apologize for attributing his ignorant, insulting, off-topic posts and angst to his age- he could very well be older than 16.brooksieb wrote:And because Nappy is a teenager dosen't mean you have to be so ageist, For all we know someone among us could be a teenager, don't make assumptions that because he is a teenager he has anger flowing through him, now that's discrimination and is a complete double standard of what people arse "supposedly" against.
Splainin'? If it's on the account of Nappy, I don't see it, he's foedmpjh wrote:Hey Lucy, so you don't buy the 'splainin' being pumped our way.


saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.