***Finn Rock Fallout*** -- Game Over ~ Infected Win

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:27 pm

AndyDufresne wrote: It seems that after a week of being infected with CHI-2 the mental state of any infected person changes. They no longer seek help and develop a maddening rage which flourishes and awakes during the dark hours.

This was on page one, during the background info that Andy was giving us.

This is what made me think that the CHI-2 infecteds (the mafia) do not infect, here it implies that they kill.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:29 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:Anyways, I move to extend voting line if its ok with andy because the voting line was put into place to keep people posting, and at 100 pages, I think that worked.

I second the motion

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:43 pm

Why, this game has slowed to a hault pretty much. Some players haven't even posted in a few days, or only one a day. We need more active players, not players who just pop in every 24 hours.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:46 pm

The fact that we have 100 pages of info makes rereading very valuable, but also very time consuming.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:25 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
trestain wrote:Reverend Kyle haw can broomy infect and kill the mafia they are already CHI-2 infected. that doesn't make sense

I still think that Mafia dont have the power to infect, they kill.

I'm going to try and find that quote that first made me think that...

He can still kill at night though, he picked that up from the mafia, but his win condition would remain the same.. so I think that we should keep him alive and rely on him to kill a supsected mafia.

I believe we should lynch trestain and have broomy lynch bogus.

trestain · Post by **trestain** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:48 pm

I am so convinced that this is all a set up by broomy that i will unvote him now and put on the 6th vote needed to kill him instead, so if he is telling the truth (which i do not think so) i will die with him.
what do you think of that

unvote Broomy until he has 5 votes, then put it back on again[b]

i have bolded the whole thing i hope andy will allow that to count as my unvote and my revote if we get to 5 and i am not online.

XenHu · Post by **XenHu** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:52 pm

Well, it's the evening lady and gentlemen and since I haven't seen Broom come forward and defend himself...

Vote Broom

I will not change my vote...

-X

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:54 pm

Well if anyone could pull off lying about something like this, it'd be Broom. Let's see what he says.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:08 pm

wicked wrote:Well if anyone could pull off lying about something like this, it'd be Broom. Let's see what he says.

We've been waiting to see what he says all day now. All he's gonna do is come up with big thread like this morning, about how we're all wrong.

trestain · Post by **trestain** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:10 pm

Andy a vote count would be good now

Also can you confirm that i can do what I said in my last post

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:11 pm

And if he does prove he's not mafia, we're gonna go the whole day 2 without a lynch. Cause I doubt we will be able to scramble our way to 6 votes, in like 20 hours.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:22 pm

Vote Count

[1] Houssam -- (Bogusbet)
[1] Wicked -- (Houssam)
[3] Broomhead -- (Master Bush, Freetymes, Xenhu)
[1] Trestain -- (Reverend_kyle)
[5] Not Voting, Everyone Else

6 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

=====

Regarding the rules...I will not accept any 'future' votes.

Also, I'm not keen on the extending the deadline. It is true that it was made to keep people posting, but it was also made to stop the Town from traveling in circles for days and weeks.

--Andy

trestain · Post by **trestain** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:26 pm

thanks andy

although andy will not accept my future vote i will still take the 6th vote so if/when broomy gets to 5 votes no-one vote for him i will make the 6th vote
I am willing to stick my balls on the line on this one. I do not believe broomy and i have stated several times i think this is a set up

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:33 pm

trestain wrote:thanks andy

although andy will not accept my future vote i will still take the 6th vote so if/when broomy gets to 5 votes no-one vote for him i will make the 6th vote
I am willing to stick my balls on the line on this one. I do not believe broomy and i have stated several times i think this is a set up

Andy's not gonna accept it, then why are you still doing it?

trestain · Post by **trestain** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:36 pm

master bush he means he won't accept my it now, not if i vote for him again when he has 5 votes

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:44 pm

andy, I think xenhu unvoted.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:48 pm

Correct he did, but he also re-voted. Check back a page or so.

--Andy

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:50 pm

I'd like another option besides Broom of someone to vote for. I just can't vote for Broom at this time. Who else? I'm still suspicious of ,,, shit, well everyone. ugghh.

Vote for now w/no further evidence: Houssam (something is fishy with him)

Still looking for dirt on, but could be convinced to vote for: Freetymes, Trestain, MB, Xenhu

Under the radar: RK, Mach, Moz

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:48 pm

trestain wrote:thanks andy

although andy will not accept my future vote i will still take the 6th vote so if/when broomy gets to 5 votes no-one vote for him i will make the 6th vote
I am willing to stick my balls on the line on this one. I do not believe broomy and i have stated several times i think this is a set up

I'd like to see you put your balls where your mouth is!

I mean...

Er....

Vote: Dagreatbroomhead

autoload · Post by **autoload** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:55 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
trestain wrote:thanks andy

although andy will not accept my future vote i will still take the 6th vote so if/when broomy gets to 5 votes no-one vote for him i will make the 6th vote
I am willing to stick my balls on the line on this one. I do not believe broomy and i have stated several times i think this is a set up

I'd like to see you put your balls where your mouth is!

I mean...

Er....

Vote: Dagreatbroomhead

I'm trying not to post here and clutter the thread, but this post has delurked me!

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:56 pm

Vote Count

[1] Houssam -- (Bogusbet)
[1] Wicked -- (Houssam)
[4] Broomhead -- (Master Bush, Freetymes, Xenhu, Mach)
[1] Trestain -- (Reverend_kyle)
[4] Not Voting, Everyone Else

6 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

--Andy

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:10 pm

WTH Mach?

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:12 pm

Machiavelli wrote:I am 90% certain that Broom is telling the truth about his power, but that does not mean that I am 90% sure that Broom is pro town

And yet you vote for him? why? we can't afford to lose a power role guys!

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:25 pm

I'm confused. So if there's a 5th for broom, does Trestain's vote make it 6? If not trestain should have just voted before he left.

wicked · Post by **wicked** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 10:26 pm

I just saw Broom browsing.. let's see what he says.

Finn Rock Fallout -- Game Over ~ Infected Win

Re: hi

hi

hi

hi

Re: hi

hi

Re: hi

Re: hi