I think he just meant that his vote being stolen means he's town. I agree with that one.StorrZerg wrote:Rage scum slipped on sempai, says he vote steals lololol
Moderator: Community Team
I think he just meant that his vote being stolen means he's town. I agree with that one.StorrZerg wrote:Rage scum slipped on sempai, says he vote steals lololol
No. Don't ask me why, but I have a strong hunch that he's 3rd party survivor.StorrZerg wrote:Deg, would you say wing was pro town?
And yet he is dead. Why? Most likely because mafia feared him. Because maybe he was on the right track, because he was leading town as 3p survivor. ....degaston wrote:Seriously, though, I was back and forth on wing, but overall I saw him as slightly scummy.

So why are you still alive?StorrZerg wrote:And yet he is dead. Why? Most likely because mafia feared him. Because maybe he was on the right track, because he was leading town as 3p survivor. ....degaston wrote:Seriously, though, I was back and forth on wing, but overall I saw him as slightly scummy.
Because I claimed my role and they believe it. And i havent lynched mafia yet. Wing didn't claim. The whole point is that he decided to play pro town. And acted upon it like I have decided to play. Honestly question why he died and look at how he played. He was super active l, vocal, and discussion driven. He didn't drop a hint of what he was.degaston wrote:So why are you still alive?StorrZerg wrote:And yet he is dead. Why? Most likely because mafia feared him. Because maybe he was on the right track, because he was leading town as 3p survivor. ....degaston wrote:Seriously, though, I was back and forth on wing, but overall I saw him as slightly scummy.

Maybe it's because you're scum?StorrZerg wrote:Because I claimed my role and they believe it. And i havent lynched mafia yet. Wing didn't claim. The whole point is that he decided to play pro town. And acted upon it like I have decided to play. Honestly question why he died and look at how he played. He was super active l, vocal, and discussion driven. He didn't drop a hint of what he was.
If you don't like my explanation that's fine, I'm game to hear why you think he died.

StorrZerg wrote:@deg, majority of town has decided to not lynch me twice, along with many dead towns not favoring me as scum. Is his behavior really that strange? Sure he might be to bold knowing what I say is true, and that's why he sticks up for me.
StorrZerg wrote:Deg have you ever town read someone for being wrong about a lynch?
StorrZerg wrote:Deg, would you say wing was pro town?
I don't know, are you going to stop asking me random questions out of the blue? I suppose it's my fault for not ignoring them.StorrZerg wrote:So deg, we have spent several pages going back and forth. Wanna turn that attention to something else or keep going at it like sex crazed teenagers?
You're welcome.StorrZerg wrote:(THANKS DEG!)

Well, since you asked so nicely...StorrZerg wrote:They are not random questions. They have a deliberate purpose.
Also can you please just throw out why you think wing died. that would be lovely.
So he mentions both you and aage in not the greatest light, and then suddenly he's dead that night?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Look at this people. A polite admittance of unhelpful behaviour. That earns benefit of the doubt. There is never any need to start arguing that not logging in till the deadline is by some measure the most town play one can make. Just admit that its not helpful and move on. Saves everyone so much time.aage wrote:It doesn't, but I'm posting nonetheless since I haven't been home since yesterday morning.WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Aage - I get that you're being efficient with your time of log in close the deadline, but how does that help town with building a case?
Lol Storr - Are you really claiming that you would never claim 3rd party whilst town just to mess about with Scum? Not even once in 10,000 games?

How can you still doubt Rage isn't scum? A fake claim can only carry you that far, even Dumbledore. Your reason for not posting is terrible. How about you make a case, instead of complaining the loss of those townies?madmitch wrote:@ deg,thanks for the breakdown,can't say I agree on all your posts, I have not posted much because I cannot see the reason why everyone wants a quick hanging but as long it not my friends Harry and Hermonie I guess I could agree with it,just make sure we have the right one' we lost tomany town already
What's up with all this delay on the actual vote? I mean discussion is great, but you can't say 'we don't want a quick hanging', but end up not discussing anything else at all. You either vote and get the day over with, or discuss.charm wrote:I plan to vote Rag, when we are ready to lynch him, but will not post a vote until we are ready. I wouldn't mind starting it early though (how about Wednesday night at the witching hour?) Then we would be able to start day 4 on Sunday. Just a thought!
Ur going after the claimed doc? Really? I don't see your point about not being hammered. He didn't get hammered because he claimed friggin Hermione, TOWN DOC.Endgame422 wrote:Re reading rage has shown that he has persistently pushed on charm.
Also he has defended pix(who is MIA) on a number of occasions before his claim of Hermione.
On this note pix getting to L-1 and not getting hammered combined with rages defense of him is making me think pix has likely fakeclaimed.
This also stands out from End: there's a difference between wagoning and voting, but it's inevitable in this size game yes. But why are you so persistant on getting the results of that investigation? You know it's more then likely a fake claim. It would add nothing. Also as Mets is dead, and we know his allignment, Rage would just claim town. What are you trying to accomplish with that question?Endgame422 wrote:Not going to defend myself anymore from dd as his case=weak sauce.
Bandwagoning is necessary in a game this size and i will continue to do so.
Or will i be lynched tomorrow for jumping on the rage wagon?
I have some thoughts but i would like rage to tell us what mets showed as when investigated.
Was he town or non-town?
If you, or any scum, hammered him after the claim you would be sacrificing yourself as we would lynch you the next day, so no any scum player would not actually do that. Also, scum could not have been on to cast said vote. Also, why can't scum defend non-scum? Just because they want to win and get rid of scum doesn't mean that letting each and every possible lynch happen is the best way to do it. You have to pretend to be town. He could buddy with the most suspicious player in case that player gets lynched, flips town, so he can say, "told you so" and get town cred. Obviously after Pixar's strong claim we didn't lynch him so that didn't happen.Endgame422 wrote:The question about mets was intended to throw some light on you streaker.
I was misunderstanding your power honestly.
For some reason i thought his "lumos" read on mets would have given him someone elses read and perhaps he would let something slip trying to validate his story.
Honestly i failed on this one.
And the hammer point was this: If i were scum and pix claimed doc i would have hammered him in a second. That would have cost town a doc and with such a big case against him they likely could have gotten away with it.
Especially with a scum vote theif involved i just feel like scum would have hammered pix if he is indeed Hermione.
And again rage defending pix BEFORE the claim(when he was pushing no lynch) makes no sense unless they are both scum?
Why would scum buddy with the most suspicious player at the time?
If rage flips a weak/moderate scum role i will definetly think that he was protecting a more important scum role.
VOTE RAGE

That was simply amazing the way you, with one small comment, blew a hole right through all of my arguments. How can I possibly refute it? A lot of people might waste time trying to dismantle a comment point by point, to show how the conclusion wasn't supported by the facts. But that's so tedious. You managed to cut through all the bullshit, and get right to the essence of the matter with a great economy of words. I bow to your obvious logical superiority. Well done, sir!StorrZerg wrote:you never playing as scum explains so much with your logic lol


Because you won't listen to what I bring up? Duh?degaston wrote:Why are you, the experienced player, asking me, the new guy who fails logic, what you should do?
