Bones2484 wrote:Is contacting her "new" boyfriend with a link to the CC thread really necessary? Sure I was always on the doubter side of the story, but isn't that taking it about 5 miles over the line?
Completely agree, Bones. You had no business doing that, Voldo.
Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..
PLAYER57832 wrote:Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..
a breach of what? it is a fair warning to a guy that is involved with a lunatic that is getting married based on her being pregnant... money on her showing him an old sonogram from a hospital she ordered online and the fact that she is not pregnant (saw this on a soap opera once! ha!). it isn't a breach of anything. she is nuts and he was fairly warned.-0
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
PLAYER57832 wrote:Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..
a breach of what? it is a fair warning to a guy that is involved with a lunatic that is getting married based on her being pregnant... money on her showing him an old sonogram from a hospital she ordered online and the fact that she is not pregnant (saw this on a soap opera once! ha!). it isn't a breach of anything. she is nuts and he was fairly warned.-0
I think he should be sent those pics she posted online too so he can decide for himself if that was just "razor burn."
PLAYER57832 wrote:Not only wrong, but this could be a breach of something..
a breach of what? it is a fair warning to a guy that is involved with a lunatic that is getting married based on her being pregnant... money on her showing him an old sonogram from a hospital she ordered online and the fact that she is not pregnant (saw this on a soap opera once! ha!). it isn't a breach of anything. she is nuts and he was fairly warned.-0
I thought you posted a link to the CC thread. That could bring the site into personnal stuff, perhaps legal stuff if she decided to get irate, whether your actions were "justified" or not.
If nothing to do with CC... then its no concern of mine. (I will say that if you give honest information, no problem. If you give incorrect information, it could be harassment)
I'm trying to help you man; you clearly have some sort of pathological wannabeism...
God damn it, I was going to finish that sentence quite impressively, but then I noticed that the above post was whitestazn's and not JoshyBoy's. Well played.
I always roll ones, but the statistics show me as having an average of aproximately 3.5 +/-3%! HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE?! There isn't even a 3.5 on six-sided dice, much less percentages!
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
The last one didn't die. It took several pages of slut-shaming to finally get it locked. I don't care if the girl has mental issues or not, everything about this, from the trivialization of assault on women (on her part as well, if she's not being honest) to the mouth-breathing porn harvest is disgusting, and it deserves to rot to oblivion in GD where the personality cliques can writhe over it like they normally do. I would take a million of Phatscotty's Tea Party linkvalanches over a single thread obsessing over anyone's personal drama.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:The last one didn't die. It took several pages of slut-shaming to finally get it locked. I don't care if the girl has mental issues or not, everything about this, from the trivialization of assault on women (on her part as well, if she's not being honest) to the mouth-breathing porn harvest is disgusting, and it deserves to rot to oblivion in GD where the personality cliques can writhe over it like they normally do. I would take a million of Phatscotty's Tea Party linkvalanches over a single thread obsessing over anyone's personal drama.
Well, it's also about how owenshooter, et. al. were right and how we should praise them for being right or apologize to them for accusing them of not being right... so there's that too.