Moderator: Community Team
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
The way i feel about it is if i go nuts on Traf again i would be a bad boy. Perhaps never to be invited to a mafia game again - like the fuss i had with DDS in my game. He called it "eye bleeding torture" and started his own game to f*ck mine over - if you walk the walk to much people can use that as a easy excuse for decades if you know what i mean..strike wolf wrote:Admittedly, its probably partly because I haven't been as active as I'd like but I've just got no strong reads today. It could be that scum is experienced and won't slip up, it could be that they are laying low or it could be a mix of the two or even that scum is composed of players I'm not that familiar with and thus haven't picked up on the oddities from my read through. I didn't particularly like Traf's last post. Too minimal and says very little and I am surprised that Son!c didn't go after him harder than he has but I can't say I've been convinced on either of them beyond a gentle poke and acknowledgement.

And you are never sure onSoN!c wrote:
Strike, Charle, Loose seem all town, but oh boy the rest??

Then you have to vote me Loose and lose- by now you voted Pix, Charle, Traf and were sus about me, Strike, EW, and one more who i can't remember right now.Loose Canon wrote:There's been lots of little points in D1 when I've had light scummy feelings about sonic.
To join the points together in a scummy line I'm thinking overall sonic has satiated his need to post with a lot of flavour assertions and so notgone Into a danger area as scum overextending/provoking.
Right now most suspect sonic.

Still seems to be day1 ... 19 days without an edited post since. leads me to think you got a warningSoN!c wrote:That was Sunday december 22... and you come up with that now - lmao

Unvotejfm10 wrote:Still seems to be day1 ... 19 days without an edited post since. leads me to think you got a warningSoN!c wrote:That was Sunday december 22... and you come up with that now - lmao

Yes , my vote on you is a contradiction.jfm10 wrote:Game wise, this is a semi-open setup (known as The New Recruit), which is why we're starting with a night phase (N0). At this point, only two roles have been assigned: two goons (but everyone has been assigned a number corresponding to a role in either of the two setups). The two goons will then decide if they will recruit a third. If they recruit a third goon, town will gain a cop and another town jailkeeper at the expense of two vanilla townies. If they decide not to recruit anyone, town will consists of a jailkeeper and vanilla only. Town won't know which (well, any cop will, obviously), which is why this is a semi-open setup.
Players
1. Charle .... town
2. Extreme Ways
3. Kingm
4. Son!c ... town
5. strike wolf
6. Loose Cannon ... town
7. Pixar
8. Devante ... town
9. kongming3
10. jfm10 ... town
11. Trafalgarlaw01
12. Maxleod ... town
Ragian assigned the 2 scum and they could choose a third or not but they will be strong.
For those labeled town you are not good enough for ragians scum party and the remaining 4 are who the 2 scum would have chosen from.


That is exactly what im thinking you would say..Loose Canon wrote:Sonic, I really don't see the point in second/pre guessing what scum would/should do tonight.












Yes i recruited EW. My scum partner had absolutely no say in the matter. And then tonight the three of us killed Pixar because we were bored as hell. Ew even said "no not pixar" ("because Devante always suspects Pix").. "We better do Strike, anybody on JFM"s scum list will do fine, or even that Loose cannon because in the morning first thing Loose will do is vote you again Son..but since i recruited EW and killing Pix over Loose made sense to me the other two scummies (the third one is Traf by the way) had to follow my lead.Loose Canon wrote:If Sonic is scum and a recruiting scum I think he would have been inclined to throw a curveball.
Whilst I think most others would have been inclined to avoid recruiting Extreme as too obvious - with Sonic my guess is that wouldn't apply so much and I think he might have been more inclined than many not to have recruited too.
What I do think is that any detective should either vote for a guilty player or for a player they have not investigated (in case they die before revealing).
I also think since there was a successful kill last night jailkeeper (s) should vote for players they didn't jail.
And that a mass of early indicative votes would provide cover for detective and jailkeeper to hide themselves in.
So I'll vote early for the player I was most suspicious (no real surprise) of end of D1.
vote Sonic
In terms of why scum targetted Pixar, I think they went for a low poster (a low poster could have been indicative of potentially having powers to scum) and also someone they think less likely to be jailed. I don't have any immediate ideas as to WHO would have been likely to have thought like that - maybe others do - maybe others disagree with my logic on WHY?
