400 diff partners? That does seem to be a very large number.Bruceswar wrote:jefjef wrote:Go for it.
What numbers are in mind?
20, 100, and 400
Moderator: Community Team
400 diff partners? That does seem to be a very large number.Bruceswar wrote:jefjef wrote:Go for it.
What numbers are in mind?
20, 100, and 400
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
yeah i agree 400 seems a bit much...that means you have to play team games with almost 1/50 of the site. I would think 25, 75, 150 would be goodjefjef wrote:400 diff partners? That does seem to be a very large number.Bruceswar wrote:jefjef wrote:Go for it.
What numbers are in mind?
20, 100, and 400

ljex wrote:yeah i agree 400 seems a bit much...that means you have to play team games with almost 1/50 of the site. I would think 25, 75, 150 would be goodjefjef wrote:400 diff partners? That does seem to be a very large number.Bruceswar wrote:jefjef wrote:Go for it.
What numbers are in mind?
20, 100, and 400

Those are basically the numbers I was thinking... Same as unique defeats except it would be unique wins.. It is possible, yet hard. Just what a GOLD medal should be.Bruceswar wrote:jefjef wrote:Go for it.
What numbers are in mind?
20, 100, and 400
400 different doubles partners is kind of absurd, imogreenoaks wrote:this should be 3 medals
one for Doubles, Triples & Quads
and i would like the levels to be 20, 100 & 400
No, the poll is for the idea of ALL partners, not dubs partners, trips partners, and quad partners. That's what my idea is anyway. Therefore, 400 is not an absurd number for the gold.Commander62890 wrote:400 different doubles partners is kind of absurd, imogreenoaks wrote:this should be 3 medals
one for Doubles, Triples & Quads
and i would like the levels to be 20, 100 & 400
We want to make it just as difficult as the other medals, not more difficult.
The poll is not the same as greenoaks' idea, right? It's not split into dubs, trips, quads?
Thank you sdhsdh wrote:1 medal or 3 seperate medals, it's still the best new medal suggestion i've read.
And I agree.. That's what I am going fordrunkmonkey wrote:I think one medal would suffice.
I don't mean to say it will stop farming... I mean to say that it will be harder to farm with this medal... like harder to farm in order to receive this medal. Idk how to word what I am saying... lolViperOverLord wrote:I don't think it'll do a thing to stop farming like you claim (not that I really care). But I'm otherwise not opposed to the idea.
It would be a metal that would be difficult to achieve via standard farming methods. I like it!iamkoolerthanu wrote:I don't mean to say it will stop farming... I mean to say that it will be harder to farm with this medal... like harder to farm in order to receive this medal. Idk how to word what I am saying... lolViperOverLord wrote:I don't think it'll do a thing to stop farming like you claim (not that I really care). But I'm otherwise not opposed to the idea.
Exactly!dwilhelmi wrote:It would be a metal that would be difficult to achieve via standard farming methods. I like it!![]()
![]()
but once people have the gold for that they will start requesting more medals and splitting it in 3 will be an obvious demandjrh_cardinal wrote:great idea![]()
I was originally thinking it should be 3 separate medals, but after reading the thread I agree 1 is probably better (400 dubs partners is a lot)
