Moderator: Community Team
Metsfanmax wrote:Lawful Evilnietzsche wrote:do me do me!!
I don't think anyone here is. Some are Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil, but no Chaotic Evil. Then again... there's good chances that one of the lurkers is Chaotic Evil.nietzsche wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Lawful Evilnietzsche wrote:do me do me!!
According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.
It would be interesting to see what the ratio is for Off Topic posters, in terms of all the alignments. Maybe we all lean towards one or two alignments.BigBallinStalin wrote:I don't think anyone here is. Some are Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil, but no Chaotic Evil. Then again... there's good chances that one of the lurkers is Chaotic Evil.nietzsche wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Lawful Evilnietzsche wrote:do me do me!!
According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
Neutral, perhaps or nuetral good?muy_thaiguy wrote:What would I be? Never played DoD before.
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
One small glaring issue......you practice LAWthegreekdog wrote:I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.notyou2 wrote:One small glaring issue......you practice LAWthegreekdog wrote:I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
Valid argument, point conceded.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.notyou2 wrote:One small glaring issue......you practice LAWthegreekdog wrote:I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good

Being "in conflict" with the government in a legal sense is different from actively standing up against the government's legitimacy. By defending a client in legal proceedings, you are implicitly legitimizing the government's ability to collect taxes on its citizens, even if you win a particular case that results in a particular client having less of a tax obligation. Therefore I categorize you as Neutral Good.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.notyou2 wrote:One small glaring issue......you practice LAWthegreekdog wrote:I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
DAMMIT!Metsfanmax wrote:Being "in conflict" with the government in a legal sense is different from actively standing up against the government's legitimacy. By defending a client in legal proceedings, you are implicitly legitimizing the government's ability to collect taxes on its citizens, even if you win a particular case that results in a particular client having less of a tax obligation. Therefore I categorize you as Neutral Good.thegreekdog wrote:Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.notyou2 wrote:One small glaring issue......you practice LAWthegreekdog wrote:I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
Since I'm not an antogonist, does that make me a protagonist, secondary but important, secondary with some impact not all that important, or background and disposable like AOG?AndyDufresne wrote:My immediate assessment would be something close to Neutral Good, since you aren't an antagonist in the Off Topics, except when Wyoming is doing something in sports.muy_thaiguy wrote:What would I be? Never played DoD before.
--Andy
I think it has something close, crossdessers.mrswdk wrote:Does Dungeons and Dragons have a ruler? I'd definitely be queen.
Attorneys are the ultimate neutralists. They will argue any side.notyou2 wrote:One small glaring issue......you practice LAWthegreekdog wrote:I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.PLAYER57832 wrote:I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
No lawful neutral. He believes in the system and is not necessarily interested in any ultimate good or bad.Baron Von PWN wrote:I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.
AoG: Too young to play D&D. It'll give him nightmares.Army of GOD wrote:AoG: sexy neutral
I don't think BBS believes in the current system. He consistently points out it's flaws and how a more libertarian system would be better. He also frequently makes cost benefits arguments about following the law, meaning he will only follow the law so long as it it beneficial to him. Lawful neutral follows the law because its the law, other arguments be damned.PLAYER57832 wrote:No lawful neutral. He believes in the system and is not necessarily interested in any ultimate good or bad.Baron Von PWN wrote:I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.
