agentcom[SN]
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
owenshooter
- Posts: 13325
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Re: agentcom[SN]
i think this is like the 3rd time you have said it.. ha!!!-Jnsniffie wrote:Cleared
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
-
stealth99
- Posts: 576
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 4:35 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada......oldest and most easterly city in north america
Re: agentcom[SN]
Wow, the fact that this received any attention at all is a joke. Just another example of a lunatic who loses a game without the experience to even know why he lost, yet he somehow has the confidence to make such a ridiculous conclusion and then based on that conclusion (which there is no doubt, he sincerely believes is a correct conclusion because of incredible arrogance), he chooses to make a malicious and accusation.
Even if an advantage were received, it cannot be acceptable here to make the leap that the player INTENDED to miss those turns to receive that advantage; just because you are pissed off and capable of devious thinking. Regardless, this player chose to make that accusation recklessly and what is appalling here is that he has not been sanctioned for his hurtful actions.
This is not acceptable for me, that at CC, you can sling mud like that without recourse; just providing you aren't a racist or a bigot.
Even if an advantage were received, it cannot be acceptable here to make the leap that the player INTENDED to miss those turns to receive that advantage; just because you are pissed off and capable of devious thinking. Regardless, this player chose to make that accusation recklessly and what is appalling here is that he has not been sanctioned for his hurtful actions.
This is not acceptable for me, that at CC, you can sling mud like that without recourse; just providing you aren't a racist or a bigot.
-
owenshooter
- Posts: 13325
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx
Re: agentcom[SN]
then go a make a suggestion for a rule change concerning this...-Jnstealth99 wrote:This is not acceptable for me, that at CC, you can sling mud like that without recourse.
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
Re: agentcom[SN]
Hmm...While I agree with the verdict Sniff, I am a bit surprised with the argument. It gives the impression that if the accused had logged in during the 24 hrs period, then...what?sniffie wrote:Agentcom did not play any other games while missing turns, nor was he online. Therefore he's cleared.
sniff
-
Metsfanmax
- Posts: 6722
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:01 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: agentcom[SN]
The accused had logged in during the 24 hour period, he just had too many games to play given the time he actually had available when he did log in. If anything, he's only guilty of taking more games than he could handle.Kaskavel wrote:Hmm...While I agree with the verdict Sniff, I am a bit surprised with the argument. It gives the impression that if the accused had logged in during the 24 hrs period, then...what?sniffie wrote:Agentcom did not play any other games while missing turns, nor was he online. Therefore he's cleared.
sniff