The Famous Five go to The Robins Nest

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:34 pm

dustn64 wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
dustn64 wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
kwanton wrote:
misterman10 wrote: go back to suckin joe off you bootlicker
lmao that was dustn
i know, thats why i told him to go back to suckin joe, hes a little wannabe
You don't even know STFU
and he also has to bold all his words, get a real life instead of living in the shadows of joeblow beevers

look at any of my other posts retard

haha my bad bro, mock joeblow all you want

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:10 pm

Pictures please Joe. Non-magazine pictures.

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:11 pm

Serbia wrote:Pictures please Joe. Non-magazine pictures.

just search joe beevers on google images

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm

misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Pictures please Joe. Non-magazine pictures.
just search joe beevers on google images

No you moron, personal pictures, that only Joe Beevers has, not nonsense that anyone can get off Google. Be smart boy!

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:15 pm

Serbia wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Pictures please Joe. Non-magazine pictures.
just search joe beevers on google images
No you moron, personal pictures, that only Joe Beevers has, not nonsense that anyone can get off Google. Be smart boy!

oh so sorry [/sarcasm]

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:17 pm

misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Pictures please Joe. Non-magazine pictures.
just search joe beevers on google images
No you moron, personal pictures, that only Joe Beevers has, not nonsense that anyone can get off Google. Be smart boy!
oh so sorry [/sarcasm]

Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:20 pm

Serbia wrote:Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?

I really haven't thought of that, now that I think of it, JoeBeevers (account name) is probably just some fat ass who worships the real Joe Beevers, quite sad in my opinion

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:26 pm

misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?
I really haven't thought of that, now that I think of it, JoeBeevers (account name) is probably just some fat ass who worships the real Joe Beevers, quite sad in my opinion

Exactly. That's why I request pictures. Non-google-able pictures.

misterman10 · Post by **misterman10** » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:29 pm

Serbia wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?
I really haven't thought of that, now that I think of it, JoeBeevers (account name) is probably just some fat ass who worships the real Joe Beevers, quite sad in my opinion
Exactly. That's why I request pictures. Non-google-able pictures.

good thinking

Joe Beevers, take a picture of you wearing a plain white t-shirt, a baseball cap, holding two pencils in your left hand and giving me the finger with your right hand. If you cant do this, then your a proven moron

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:41 am

misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?
I really haven't thought of that, now that I think of it, JoeBeevers (account name) is probably just some fat ass who worships the real Joe Beevers, quite sad in my opinion
Exactly. That's why I request pictures. Non-google-able pictures.
good thinking

Joe Beevers, take a picture of you wearing a plain white t-shirt, a baseball cap, holding two pencils in your left hand and giving me the finger with your right hand. If you cant do this, then your a proven moron

If he condescended to take such crap from you he wouldn't be the real Joe. It's a catch 22. You=Fail

Dancing Mustard · Post by **Dancing Mustard** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:01 am

You better watch yourself Joe, when your goons come round to my local nuclear sub I'll be waiting with Ninja Nick and Wu-Tang Wallace, they'll fucking 'ave you, and her indoors. Ta ta for now my old china.

Shadowstar · Post by **Shadowstar** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:43 pm

misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?
I really haven't thought of that, now that I think of it, JoeBeevers (account name) is probably just some fat ass who worships the real Joe Beevers, quite sad in my opinion
Exactly. That's why I request pictures. Non-google-able pictures.
good thinking

Joe Beevers, take a picture of you wearing a plain white t-shirt, a baseball cap, holding two pencils in your left hand and giving me the finger with your right hand. If you cant do this, then your a proven moron

Ah, but you see, is not necessary, for you have already proven him wrong in flame wars.

DAZMCFC · Post by **DAZMCFC** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:36 pm

now who the f*ck would be carrying 60,000 pounds(120,000dollars) in their wallet. f*ck me how big is the wallet.

there is another thing in the 60`s the Krays came up to manchester trying to throw their weight about and got their arses slapped and sent back down to london the tosser(true fact a mate of mines dad was there).

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:38 pm

qeee1 wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:
misterman10 wrote:
Serbia wrote:Tell me misterman, do you believe this cat is the REAL Joe Beevers?
I really haven't thought of that, now that I think of it, JoeBeevers (account name) is probably just some fat ass who worships the real Joe Beevers, quite sad in my opinion
Exactly. That's why I request pictures. Non-google-able pictures.
good thinking

Joe Beevers, take a picture of you wearing a plain white t-shirt, a baseball cap, holding two pencils in your left hand and giving me the finger with your right hand. If you cant do this, then your a proven moron
If he condescended to take such crap from you he wouldn't be the real Joe. It's a catch 22. You=Fail

Not really. If Bruce Willis, king of kickassery, can go on webcam to prove his identity, a nobody like Joe can do his suggestion fo sho.

PWNED.

With all due respect,

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:46 pm

It was a remark on Joe's personality not his level of fame.

*Yawn*

NEXT!

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 6:57 pm

What you mean is it's a reflection of the mythical personality that this fuckwit has created.

luns101 · Post by **luns101** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:19 pm

dustn64 wrote:When is the take over? I have been putting money back so I can buy posts.

I cashed out my mutual funds for the big day. Oh Joy!

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:29 pm

The1exile wrote:What you mean is it's a reflection of the mythical personality that this fuckwit has created.

Sure, whatever, still means you're wrong.

The1exile · Post by **The1exile** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:09 pm

Not really.

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:42 pm

The1exile wrote:Not really.

Ok, logic breakdown time:

I said how misterman's challenge was unfair as it was a catch 22 and therefore not valid. The reason it was a catch 22 was because in either situation Joe Beever is revealed as not being Joe Beever.

You said it wasn't a catch 22 because Bruce Willis revealed himself.

I pointed out that it's not a catch22 because of fame but rather because in submitting to the request joe would show himself as not being of the personality he is/he's trying to portray (I left it ambiguous)

You basically agreed but restricted it to the latter case.

In agreeing you're saying it that in either situation Joe Beever is revealed as not being Joe Beever therefore it is a catch 22, which makes you wrong when you said it wasn't.

Now don't ever claim to pwn me again.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:48 am

qeee1 wrote:
The1exile wrote:Not really.
Ok, logic breakdown time:

I said how misterman's challenge was unfair as it was a catch 22 and therefore not valid. The reason it was a catch 22 was because in either situation Joe Beever is revealed as not being Joe Beever.

You said it wasn't a catch 22 because Bruce Willis revealed himself.

I pointed out that it's not a catch22 because of fame but rather because in submitting to the request joe would show himself as not being of the personality he is/he's trying to portray (I left it ambiguous)

You basically agreed but restricted it to the latter case.

In agreeing you're saying it that in either situation Joe Beever is revealed as not being Joe Beever therefore it is a catch 22, which makes you wrong when you said it wasn't.

Now don't ever claim to pwn me again.

admit that you got pwned you stupid goddamn moron

Cam later?

qeee1 · Post by **qeee1** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:00 am

reverend_kyle wrote: admit that you got pwned you stupid goddamn moron

Cam later?

... *grumble grumble* fine... but you gotta wear the gloves this time.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:38 pm

qeee1 wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote: admit that you got pwned you stupid goddamn moron

Cam later?
... *grumble grumble* fine... but you gotta wear the gloves this time.

but i don't want to