Huckabee and Obama take it...

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:10 am

Neutrino wrote:I wish I were talented enough to repeat the same statement three times.

Repetition is the biggest form of mind control.

Repeat.

Skittles! · Post by **Skittles!** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:30 am

Serbia wrote:
Neutrino wrote:I wish I were talented enough to repeat the same statement three times.

Repetition is the biggest form of mind control.

Repeat.

That's why Time consumes so much of our mind.

You know like, 1 am, 1 pm. 1st of the month, 12 month. Year in, year out..

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:25 am

Norse wrote:
radiojake wrote:
Just an interesting thought

Not really.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:44 am

Norse wrote:
Norse wrote:
Norse wrote:
radiojake wrote:
Just an interesting thought

Not really.

Just shut up.

Norse · Post by **Norse** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 11:47 am

unriggable wrote:
Just shut up.

Nope.

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:15 pm

Guiscard wrote:
radiojake wrote:Is it odd that today on the news service here in Australia they had a run down of the candidates running - I had heard of a few of them already purely from being on these boards, but to actually hear it on our news service made me think just how much American politics dominates the entire world. I wouldn't have even known there was an election in Pakistan if it weren't for the assasination, let alone know the names of the candidates who were running for nomination to have a crack at the presidency -

Just an interesting thought

The 'election' in Pakistan has been getting pretty major coverage in the UK for a while now... I'd have thought it was a pretty major event, although I suppose we do have a lot of people of Pakistan origin so it is perhaps more relevant than to Australia...

But yes, American politics does get pretty big coverage. Whoever wins is gonna have their finger over a huge red button, so I guess we all want to know who it will be! Plus Bush is certainly a worldwide figure now, so the election of his successor is bound to make the news.

fwiw, i think the news outlets here were talking about the election in pakistan before the bhutto assination...but probably from a war on terror perspective.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:20 pm

Lets not forget Pat Robertson won Iowa in 1988. :oops:

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:24 pm

jay_a2j wrote:Lets not forget Pat Robertson won Iowa in 1988.

Actually you are incorrect. Robert Dole had 37.4% to Pat Robertson's 24.6% in the 1988 Republican Caucus.

--Andy

OnlyAmbrose · Post by **OnlyAmbrose** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 5:34 pm

I don't think Ron Paul did bad at all. 10% in a caucus isn't bad at all, especially when he came in just 4% behind the third place finisher. I'm not disappointed.

Ham · Post by **Ham** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:57 pm

We never expected to win the caucus. I xpected 3rd which we were very close to.

We have gone a long ways from 1%. We're getting there.

Paul came in first with independent republicans with 29%.

We will gain speed.

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:15 pm

Guiscard wrote:Sorry Ron...

Ron beat Giulliani...surprising that Paul got 10%! I figure he will do a bit better in New Hampshire, but the Republican mind frame is owned by the NeoCons...so I don't expect RonPaul to get the nomination.

I am preparing to vote for Obama, but I will consider whomever RonPaul endorses.

Congrats to Obama and Huckabee!

got tonkaed · Post by **got tonkaed** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:28 pm

in theory of paul was going to do well in an early state, it would be new hampshire...its too bad romney will probably get a lot of that vote. or at least too bad for paul.

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:04 pm

OnlyAmbrose wrote:I don't think Ron Paul did bad at all. 10% in a caucus isn't bad at all, especially when he came in just 4% behind the third place finisher. I'm not disappointed.

Especially considering 9u11iani's low, low vote.

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:49 pm

unriggable wrote:
OnlyAmbrose wrote:I don't think Ron Paul did bad at all. 10% in a caucus isn't bad at all, especially when he came in just 4% behind the third place finisher. I'm not disappointed.

Especially considering 9u11iani's low, low vote.

I was thrown back by the low vote on Giullani...Ron Paul kicked his ass! :twisted:

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:54 pm

What you've got to realize about Giuliani and his low vote total..was that he skipped campaigning in Iowa. And he isn't doing it in New Hampshire either. Or South Carolina. Or Nevada. He's going straight to Florida. Different strategy. I don't think it will work. But that's the reason for low voter turn-out for him.

--Andy

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:13 pm

unriggable wrote: 9u11iani's

ROFL! Too funny! :lol:

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:51 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:What you've got to realize about Giuliani and his low vote total..was that he skipped campaigning in Iowa. And he isn't doing it in New Hampshire either. Or South Carolina. Or Nevada. He's going straight to Florida. Different strategy. I don't think it will work. But that's the reason for low voter turn-out for him.

--Andy

Andy beat me to the explanation. :cry:

At least I disagree. I think it will work for Giuliani. I'm certainly hoping he wins the nomination – that way Republicans have no chance... :lol:

DaGip · Post by **DaGip** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:14 am

jay_a2j wrote:
unriggable wrote: 9u11iani's

ROFL! Too funny!

Exactly!

Serbia · Post by **Serbia** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:58 pm

I just wanted to point out that Romney won in Wyoming. CNN Story And best I can tell, there aren't many Americans in Wyoming, because Paul got a 0%. Even though he did campaign in the state. FoxNews Story

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:14 pm

Huckabee is joke!!! How can you be this stupid!!!

luns101 · Post by **luns101** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:39 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Huckabee is goddam joke!!! How can you be this stupid!!!

Who are you talking to?

unriggable · Post by **unriggable** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:41 pm

jay_a2j wrote:
unriggable wrote: 9u11iani's

ROFL! Too funny!

The name or the campaign turnout?

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:41 pm

luns101 wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Huckabee is goddam joke!!! How can you be this stupid!!!

Who are you talking to?

Huckabee, how is it possible to end up with a protectionist who thinks he can make America self sufficient...also I sort of exageratd the comment to wheedle out Huckabee supproers into debate.

luns101 · Post by **luns101** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:45 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:
luns101 wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Huckabee is goddam joke!!! How can you be this stupid!!!

Who are you talking to?

Huckabee, how is it physically possibleto end up with a protectionist who thinks he can make America self sufficient.

Perhaps you could do it without swearing. I know others here don't care about that, but I thought you did.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:46 pm

luns101 wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
luns101 wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Huckabee is goddam joke!!! How can you be this stupid!!!

Who are you talking to?

Huckabee, how is it physically possibleto end up with a protectionist who thinks he can make America self sufficient.

Perhaps you could do it without swearing. I know others here don't care about that, but I thought you did.

Ok, this seems fair enough, I didn't realise you would consider this swearing. I wanted to add emphasis to the statement in a disparaging and colloquial way, the aim ofmy post being more than anything to draw into debate with Huckabe-ists.

Huckabee and Obama take it...

Re: Huckabee and Obama take it...