U guys sicken me

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:31 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

ignotus · Post by **ignotus** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:35 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

Well I am from (primitive) Balkans so I'm excused. :roll:

I really don't see anything wrong in a little bit of lust. What is wrong with that? btw I respect women for their intellect as well (like btown, wicked, apey, h2sy, et cetera). Without them this forum would look like a gay party. :wink:

P.S. Norse got a better sense of humor so I don't think it's him. :roll:

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:37 pm

greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

ignotus · Post by **ignotus** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:37 pm

InkL0sed wrote:The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

QFT!

firth4eva · Post by **firth4eva** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:40 pm

Let's have a vote.
Who thinks its Norse?
Who thinks it's Snorri?
Who thinks it's some real misguided woman?
Vote now.

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:42 pm

InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

yet the whole world seems to agree that George Bush is a dumbass.

InkL0sed · Post by **InkL0sed** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:43 pm

greenoaks wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.
yet the whole world seems to agree that George Bush is a dumbass.

So...?

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:45 pm

ignotus wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.

QFT!

Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Snorri1234 · Post by **Snorri1234** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:51 pm

ignotus wrote:P.S. Norse got a better sense of humor so I don't think it's him.

Location: Handcuffed to a daffodil
Website:
Occupation: ....what's occupation mean?
Interests: Pixies, rainbows and cherry drops.

Yeah, don't think it's him either. :-^

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:01 pm

Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

bloknayrb · Post by **bloknayrb** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:20 pm

Neutrino wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

My god... can I use this as my forum sig from now on?

Gregrios · Post by **Gregrios** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:22 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

As much as people don't like to hear it, your absolutely right. Women are more than just a body. On the other hand though, if a woman dresses to tease than she is subjecting herself to looks of lust. I don't feel a bit bad about women who are half dressed and complain about comments they get.

It's the oldest story in the book. If you don't want people thinking that all you are is a nice body than don't go around dressed half naked and expect respect.

Unfortunitely, guys don't limit their sexual comments to those that are looking for that kind of attention.

I hate to say it but women are more responsable for the lack of respect than men are. No to say that their fully responsable but they definitely carry most of the blame.

Neutrino · Post by **Neutrino** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:27 pm

bloknayrb wrote:
Neutrino wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

My god... can I use this as my forum sig from now on?

Sure.

Napoleon Ier · Post by **Napoleon Ier** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:01 pm

Neutrino wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Originally they were used as an approximate measure find out who was falling behind in classes back in 19th century France.

Intriguing. I too care deeply about the minutiae of French history.

As you should, child.

0ojakeo0 · Post by **0ojakeo0** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:17 pm

RadicalJerk wrote: eggsamples .

AAHAHAHA. with that spelling im suprised noone thought it was me.

Skoffin · Post by **Skoffin** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:45 pm

I can't tell you how surprised I am that no one has posted any half-naked pics by now... are you guys losing your touch?

Kid_A · Post by **Kid_A** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:26 pm

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

show us your vagina

griffin_slayer · Post by **griffin_slayer** » Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:40 pm

i think big & rich have it right http://youtube.com/watch?v=RWplisHNE6w&feature=related

UCAbears · Post by **UCAbears** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:02 am

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

Your kinda a hypocrite aren't you?

griffin_slayer · Post by **griffin_slayer** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:04 am

he's right

greenoaks · Post by **greenoaks** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:22 am

InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:
greenoaks wrote:
RadicalJerk wrote:women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

yet the overwhelming majority of people with high iq's are men.

The idea that intelligence is quantifiable is ridiculous. IQ's are bullshit, horse shit, and many other kinds of turd all in one.
yet the whole world seems to agree that George Bush is a dumbass.

So...?

Bush has a low iq.

griffin_slayer · Post by **griffin_slayer** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:36 am

not really, everyone just hates him and says he has a low iq as a result of that hate. understand?

MeDeFe · Post by **MeDeFe** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:16 am

Skoffin wrote:I can't tell you how surprised I am that no one has posted any half-naked pics by now... are you guys losing your touch?

I will remedy the situation immediately.

And one fully naked as well, those shoes really cannot count as clothing.

radiojake · Post by **radiojake** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:33 am

RadicalJerk wrote:You all objectify and discriminate against women. Ive seen so many eggsamples of preggudice since ive bean here its like you all sit on your pc and just like lust over naked women...cant u see that this just makes them feel that all they can give u is there naked bodys they must feel bad reading your posts. women can learn quicker and better than men and have been proofen to be more clever than men and all you can do is apprecaite there skin??????

no wonder y most of u r probly never been with a women eva.

Is this brooksieb making a poor attempt to parody me?

clapper011 · Post by **clapper011** » Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:37 am

U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me

Re: U guys sicken me