So what does it mean to be British!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
heavycola
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 11:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Post by heavycola »

suggs wrote:who are you


your mum
Image
reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

Snorri1234 wrote:Also, you guys lost the Iraq war too.


no we didn't. i specifically remember the ticker tape parade down Broadway in Manhattan, we all lauded Gen. Schwarzkopf for a job well done!
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

Snorri1234 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
sam_levi_11 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
sam_levi_11 wrote:oh the one war you still harp on about....geeze youd think youd change the record considering we have the best military history in the civilised world
Depends on how you look at it.
no it doesnt, its fact


Fact: in a little over 200 years, the US has been involved in what, 50 odd wars? And only 2 of them weren't straight up victories. Those being Korea (still not technically over) and Vietnam (you can thank the media for this one, lugging huge cameras out into the battlefield and making US troops easy targets for the Viet Cong).


Yeah, I'm sure vietnam was lost because of the media and not because of the fact the soldiers didn't actually know a lot about fighting in the jungle or that the leaders made bad decisions....


Also, you guys lost the Iraq war too.


The US won the Viet-Nam war. Only when Congress forbade any further involvment did the NVA launch their assault and overwhelm ARVN. The consensus amongst historians is that had the US increased troop numbers after the post-Tet annhiliation of Victor Charlie, or had US air power remained as a threat to the North, in 1973, there is no way that the South would have collapsed.

Iraq is being won by the Petraeus-Odierno surge strategy.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

Napoleon Ier wrote:Iraq is being won by the Petraeus-Odierno surge strategy.


what, you mean the brilliant and novel idea of sending enough fucking troops to get the job done?

Gen. Shinseki was saying that back in motherfucking 2003. don't be such a Bush Administration cheerleader.

hell, even little old ME said we needed to send 500,000 troops to take Iraq. it was in a paper i wrote in college, as a net assessment of an invasion of Iraq for the purpose of staging protracted conflict with Iran, the real threat to US interests.

and i wrote that in 2001. if this wasn't an interweb forum, and actually counted for something, i could prove that.

of course, proving that doesn't accomplish much, except to prove that i'm smarter than the administration, and at least as smart as the Joint Chiefs were before Bush dismantled the brains at the Pentagon.
reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

also, we lost Iraq before the battle to topple Saddam's gov't was even finished.

i knew this as soon as i saw people looting in Baghdad.

it reminded me of other images of people looting... the riots in LA after the Rodney King verdict.

and how did we stop those riots? (and they were vicious as hell... the "insurgents" may not have had RPGs, but you best believe they had fully automatic weapons)


BOOTS ON THE GROUND.

i knew from the start we couldn't provide the kind of law and order necessary to secure the nation. fucking idiot administration.

look, Napoleon, as much as i despise your thoughts on racism and your supporting the subjugation of entire peoples, i have to try and engage you on an intellectual level here. there's something else you need to consider...

all of the good people have LEFT Iraq. why would you STAY in a lawless, hyper violent nation?

we already lost Iraq. at this point we're just grasping at straws.... juking the stats to make the leaders look good.

sorry, but that's just how it is.
User avatar
Anarkistsdream
Posts: 7567
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 11:57 am
Gender: Male

Post by Anarkistsdream »

reminisco wrote:
Snorri1234 wrote:Also, you guys lost the Iraq war too.


no we didn't. i specifically remember the ticker tape parade down Broadway in Manhattan, we all lauded Gen. Schwarzkopf for a job well done!


Very few people will get that joke. :wink:
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
User avatar
Fruitcake
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:38 am

Post by Fruitcake »

Funny thing I have noticed.

The topic I put up was So what does it mean to be British

The thread has turned into a discussion about the merits of American war history.

Funny thing really, as quite often, that is actually what it is to be British.
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
btownmeggy
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Post by btownmeggy »

Fruitcake wrote:Funny thing I have noticed.

The topic I put up was So what does it mean to be British

The thread has turned into a discussion about the merits of American war history.

Funny thing really, as quite often, that is actually what it is to be British.


Anyone here ever take a Zogby poll?

One of the concluding questions they always ask you is: "Do you feel you are mostly a citizen of: a) your town/city b) your country c) the planet Earth."
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

reminisco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Iraq is being won by the Petraeus-Odierno surge strategy.


what, you mean the brilliant and novel idea of sending enough fucking troops to get the job done?

Gen. Shinseki was saying that back in motherfucking 2003. don't be such a Bush Administration cheerleader.

hell, even little old ME said we needed to send 500,000 troops to take Iraq. it was in a paper i wrote in college, as a net assessment of an invasion of Iraq for the purpose of staging protracted conflict with Iran, the real threat to US interests.

and i wrote that in 2001. if this wasn't an interweb forum, and actually counted for something, i could prove that.

of course, proving that doesn't accomplish much, except to prove that i'm smarter than the administration, and at least as smart as the Joint Chiefs were before Bush dismantled the brains at the Pentagon.


Oh...sure, there were people making it clear that more troops were needed as early as '03. Prolem was, no one listened to them until now.

And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.


and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.


lets see.... single armed conflicts where we've lost...

Pearl Harbor. we lost that one.

the Battle of the Coral Sea -- Japanese Victory there.

there are more, but i'm bored of this now.
Last edited by reminisco on Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
firth4eva
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Post by firth4eva »

5 years ago today the war on Iraq was started.
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

reminisco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.


and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.


So, it's neither.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Post by got tonkaed »

reminisco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.


and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.


Im going to assume you were being clever here because im pretty sure napoleon would argue it doesnt.

If you werent being clever, your use of analogies leaves a smidge to be desired.
reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

got tonkaed wrote:
reminisco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.


and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.


Im going to assume you were being clever here because im pretty sure napoleon would argue it doesnt.

If you werent being clever, your use of analogies leaves a smidge to be desired.


yeah, good point. wasn't trying to be clever, and i don't really want to get into it again with that fucking racist waste of life Napoleon ShitBird Ier.

because the Dixie Flag does symbolize what i said it does. and anyone who claims otherwise really should do as i've suggested before... go to Harlem, or North Philly, wave your flag proudly, and see how long you keep your teeth.
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

got tonkaed wrote:
reminisco wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:And Iraq has yet to actually be lost. So the US had not lost a single armed conflixt in all it's history.


and that, old chum, is as stupid and ignorant as claiming the Dixie Flag doesn't symbolize slavery.


Hang on then, so the Dixie Flag represents slavery. Right....despite it being the star-and-stripes under which slave ships always sailed?
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
btownmeggy
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Post by btownmeggy »

Napoleon Ier wrote:Hang on then, so the Dixie Flag represents slavery. Right....despite it being the star-and-stripes under which slave ships always sailed?


Nearly all slave ships were Dutch and Portuguese.
Last edited by btownmeggy on Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
reminisco
Posts: 777
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:30 pm
Location: Killadelphia, Pennsylvania

Post by reminisco »

ANYWAY, back on topic.

i think this video sums up what it means to be British:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waWK53ZMwng
User avatar
Fruitcake
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:38 am

Post by Fruitcake »

I suppose another couple of aspects to add to the list of what it is to be British should be an understanding of irony, and the facility for limitless Self-deprecation.
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
Guiscard
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Post by Guiscard »

Queueing.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:52 pm
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Post by Snorri1234 »

Guiscard wrote:Queueing.


This.
Yes.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Balsiefen
Posts: 2299
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: The Ford of the Aldar in the East of the Kingdom of Lindissi
Contact:

Post by Balsiefen »

Little Britain wrote:Britain, Britain, Britain. Everybody is welcome in Britain. We are open 'til six. No foreign gentlemen please
User avatar
btownmeggy
Posts: 2042
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 1:43 am

Post by btownmeggy »

Balsiefen wrote:
Little Britain wrote:Britain, Britain, Britain. Everybody is welcome in Britain. We are open 'til six. No foreign gentlemen please


:lol:
User avatar
Fruitcake
Posts: 2194
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:38 am

Post by Fruitcake »

Having no understanding of the needs of johnny foreigner...
Image

Due to current economic conditions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off
User avatar
brooksieb
Posts: 1060
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 5:44 pm

Post by brooksieb »

the idea of a foreigner taking your money to pay for their children, glorious, glorious britain!!!glad i'm not british....
User avatar
suggs
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:16 pm
Location: At the end of the beginning...

Post by suggs »

It means we get to eat fried egg sandwiches.
God Save The Egg.
Norse wrote:But, alas, you are all cock munching rent boys, with an IQ that would make my local spaco clinic blush.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”