you make such a valid point, truly, however, i tend to disagree.Dancing Mustard wrote:Mate... shut up.
Moderator: Community Team
you make such a valid point, truly, however, i tend to disagree.Dancing Mustard wrote:Mate... shut up.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
iiiitDancing Mustard wrote:Shhhhhhhh
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
If you haven't realised, it's a fucking forum. People can involve themselves into a conversations whenever they wish.black elk speaks wrote:not at all. what i am saying is why inject a motion to stop arguing points in a conversation / debate when you simply have no obligation to involve yourself in the first place.Dancing Mustard wrote:So what you're saying is that he shouldn't say 'Shut up' any more? Right?
By doing that you're essentially saying "No you shut up... saying shut up is bad", but in a more sanctimonious way.
Face it, by rocking up and saying "People ought to ignore stuff they don't like, apart from me, who is entitled to bang on about it in a separate thread and demand that people suffer my droning in silence", you're being a tad hypocritical.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
but what is the point of telling some one to shut up? if you don't want to be subjected to it, then don't read it.Skittles! wrote:If you haven't realised, it's a fucking forum. People can involve themselves into a conversations whenever they wish.black elk speaks wrote:not at all. what i am saying is why inject a motion to stop arguing points in a conversation / debate when you simply have no obligation to involve yourself in the first place.Dancing Mustard wrote:So what you're saying is that he shouldn't say 'Shut up' any more? Right?
By doing that you're essentially saying "No you shut up... saying shut up is bad", but in a more sanctimonious way.
Face it, by rocking up and saying "People ought to ignore stuff they don't like, apart from me, who is entitled to bang on about it in a separate thread and demand that people suffer my droning in silence", you're being a tad hypocritical.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
so if you get sick, and want something new, why not just not bother looking at it. if you want to talk about the obvious, it was obvious that juan and i were still interested in restating our points. it was obvious that we were both still interested in continuing the conversation and it was obvious that there were some others there that wanted to drone on about the issue. obviously, jones could have simply said "i can't take it any more, i am dropping out of this" instead ov being rude about it.Skittles! wrote:Maybe because, as he said, you two were arguing about the same thing continuously. Isn't that a bit mind droning? He obviously thought it was damn boring, and told you two to shut up. He was obviously looking at the thread, but when you two constantly argued about the same thing, he got sick of it and wanted something new.
Wah wah wah.
Let me tell you a little story about a man named Sh! Sh! even before you start. That was a pre-emptive "sh!" Now, I have a whole bag of "sh!" with your name on it.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Ew! Ew! **raises hand** I do!, or at least I try.Neoteny wrote:Also, what the f*ck is etiquette? Who does this?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
MeDeFe wrote:Everyone in this thread needs to shut up, including me. Yay for not being a hypocrite!
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
we are all too busy talking to even hear people say shut upstrike wolf wrote:MeDeFe wrote:Everyone in this thread needs to shut up, including me. Yay for not being a hypocrite!
I concur. Too bad no one else is listening.
Yeah, love it or leave it. But failing that, shut up.black elk speaks wrote:i don't think i will shut up. this is a perfect example of "if you don't like the topic, don't read it" but there's no reason be rude about it!
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
true, the that time is not now, for me. i am clearly in the right on this one.pimpdave wrote:Or people who know when to quit. Either, really.
i would wager that i am older than you are so a whelp i am not. regardless of the topic, being rude really should not be a part of the equation. though, by your posts in the thread in question, rudeness is a completely valid method of argument.Juan_Bottom wrote:Welp, Jones can tell me to shut up, cauze I respect him, and he was right.
Also, Frop got some major Charisma points +10 for his post on page one.
Dm gets +5.
black elk speaks wrote:though, by your posts in the thread in question, rudeness is a completely valid method of argument.
i took your slang for the term whelp. my error.Juan_Bottom wrote:Huh? Where do you live, cauze I've never heard that welp is a name for young people?
Welp, is just like saying, 'well,' at the start of a sentance, only it's slang is all.
black elk speaks wrote:though, by your posts in the thread in question, rudeness is a completely valid method of argument.![]()