Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
not at all, and if you feel that that is what I am saying, then you must be illiterate. Tisha said in the Live Chat which got me banished for the fourth time that what James Vazquez said to me was NOT a flame because it was a question. In that case, my comment to her which was caused me to get my first two banishments was not a flame as it was presented in question form.joecoolfrog wrote:So there we have the Max thought process, question him and its a flame but his insults to others are fine.....yes very fine reasoning

in order to comment adequately to what you said, it would involve making comments which will be considered flames. As a result, I will leave it as this: whether or not the first banishment was fair, the third and fourth were not. They were made out of a moderators dislike towards me due to previous actions. There was no justification or rationale for me to be banned and James should keep his work and biases separate, or should be removed from his position as mod. He abused his power and should not be allowed to stay and do harm to others when he is clearly unfit for his position.owenshooter wrote:given the late hour.. does anyone else get the feeling max is posting on a laptop hiding under his blanket so his mom doesn't catch him? wow.. give it a rest... you said a very deplorable and disgusting thing to a woman, and you should have been banned. one day, when you are older, and understand women a bit more (nobody truly understands a woman, not even other women), you will understand how truly disgusting what you said, was. go ask your mom if your ban was fair, and i bet she slaps the taste out of your mouth.-0
says the kid that posted this garbage to a female member in live chat:maxatstuy wrote:There was no justification or rationale for me to be banned and James should keep his work and biases separate, or should be removed from his position as mod. He abused his power and should not be allowed to stay and do harm to others when he is clearly unfit for his position.
there is no defending what you did.-0maxatstuy wrote:How did you take the dildo out after it got stuck up there?

A grand example of his hypocrisy, crying all night long about being flamed whilst doing it himself constantly.maxatstuy wrote:not at all, and if you feel that that is what I am saying, then you must be illiterate. Tisha said in the Live Chat which got me banished for the fourth time that what James Vazquez said to me was NOT a flame because it was a question. In that case, my comment to her which was caused me to get my first two banishments was not a flame as it was presented in question form.joecoolfrog wrote:So there we have the Max thought process, question him and its a flame but his insults to others are fine.....yes very fine reasoning
It is a logical assessment to be made based on Tishas comment
yeah, it is confounding... and yet, here we are, on another fresh page... oh, incase anyone just jumps in at this point, you shouldn't forget the comment the OP made about a female member, which he can't believe he was chat banned for, and he is demanding the mod be stripped of his powers for doing so:comic boy wrote: A grand example of his hypocrisy, crying all night long about being flamed whilst doing it himself constantly.
as you can see, nothing innapropriate to see here.. move along...-0maxatstuy wrote:How did you take the dildo out after it got stuck up there?

Whether provoked or not, flaming in Live Chat is not OK. Didn't your mother ever tell you that two wrongs don't make a right?Jeff Hardy wrote:oh and btw, i used to see max in live chat a lot but i never saw him flame anyone unless he was provoked
QFT!!! if i ever said,RashidJelzin wrote:Next time you're annoyed by your mother, tell her what you told Tisha, and when you're crying in your closet with a swollen cheek that evening, repeat it to your dad.
Hopefully, that will rid us of you.
to my mother... i would wake up dead, period.. i am talking even to this day at my advancedmaxatstuy wrote:How did you take the dildo out after it got stuck up there?

owenshooter wrote:to my mother... i would wake up dead, period.. i am talking even to this day at my advancedmaxatstuy wrote:How did you take the dildo out after it got stuck up there?
age!!! and the only involvment my father would have, would be agreeing to the cover story about
where i was, and helping to get rid of the body... mmmmm, i can almost taste myself after stewing
in a big pot with some collard greens....-0
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...

QFT!!! Tisha and Insomnia are natural causes of flaming and that their inability to refrain from instigating issues ultimately cause to their feelings being hurt. Here is an idea and this applies to everyone who doesnt want to hear what I have to say, USE THE FOE BUTTON. Before I said that line to Tisha, which I hardly consider a flame just because it was a moderate version of the true way I feel about her, she types to ignore line in chat in reference to me (/ignore maxatstuy). She intentionally tried to instigate issue and my response was very well justified. If she doesnt want to listen to me then ignore me, stop trying to cause issues and then crying about when you get told off because you will get told off, and you will cry.Snorri1234 wrote:Since when did everyone become such a pussy?
ROFL...when you start to read the E-tickets I send in, I will start using it again.AndyDufresne wrote:Lets get the thread back onto the topic...uh, whatever the original may be now. Max, if you've any personal complaints, you can always take them to E-ticket.
--Andy
Yet James never took any action against anyone other than myself. The day after the fourth banishment, after I sent in 5 E-tickets, he warned soka about flaming me and even though the flames continued, he didnt take any action.Sentinel XIV wrote:Whether provoked or not, flaming in Live Chat is not OK. Didn't your mother ever tell you that two wrongs don't make a right?Jeff Hardy wrote:oh and btw, i used to see max in live chat a lot but i never saw him flame anyone unless he was provoked
I never instigate the disagreements, when someone speaks out of complete ignorance and makes a statement which they then refuse to justify, it is them that are starting issue. People such as yourself and Tisha like to pass judgment on how I will act when I enter live chat and make that clear from the moment I arrive; I just make sure to live up to your expectations. The only reason you are ever in Live Chat anyway, Insomnia, is because you like to exert your imaginary power over people and tell them to stop flaming or spamming. You pretend you are a mod when you are not and never contribute anything to chat. That is why I dont have respect for what you say and that is why you dont like my presence in live chat. Dont bs and say that your problem with me is that I break the rules because you know that is far from the truth.InsomniaRed wrote:Max, everyone who frequents Live Chat knows that you instigate fights there as often as possible. Your flames had gotten ridiculous and your trolling was just annoying. And then you go and complain because James calls you a name that you let wicked call you every day, but suddenly you're all broken-hearted over it?
You got chat banned for a reason. You know perfectly well what you do and this thread is your useless attempt to slanders people's names.
No one will miss you being around in Live Chat, and if you are upset that you keep getting chat banned, then here's a crazy thought: stop flaming, stop spamming, stop causing problems.
The things you say to the females are unacceptable, and the fights you instigate and the flames you insinuate are just not suitable for Live Chat. The place is much more peaceful without you, so please learn your lesson and if/when you come back, please try to be more civil.
I am sure if you read the rest of the thread, instead of just the last post, you would already know the answer, she tried to start conflict with me in Live Chat and I told her off as a result. While this may come across as a flame (when it is not my intention,) Tisha is one of Scott's "special friends" and doesnt like that I publicly acknowledge Scott as the cheat he is. James objected to the way I spoke about Tisha and even though I only made those comments for the first two bans, he tried to find any illogical excuse to ban me again and again after that. My bans were not a result of me flaming, they were a result of me flaming Tisha and that should have no effect, and even though I never flamed her the last two times, he continued to ban me because of James' opinion about me and not because of what I did that day in chat.Blitzaholic wrote:why would you mouth off or yell at tisha? she is a nice woman and no need to blast her, geeez max, why dont you pick on males and leave her alone.
This reads like an essay about the detailed contents of flabberworm's shit.maxatstuy wrote:[lame-font][whine] Waah waaah waaaah!
I got banned! Waaaaah! [/whine][/lame-font]
then why are you wasting your time commenting?RashidJelzin wrote:This reads like an essay about the detailed contents of flabberworm's shit.maxatstuy wrote:[lame-font][whine] Waah waaah waaaah!
I got banned! Waaaaah! [/whine][/lame-font]
No one gives a flying f*ck, really.
coming from the person the person who has to flame the person whom he openly calls a child in order to make himself feel superior. Why dont you read the Forum Guidlines like a big boy instead of acting like an envious little baby who is jealous that a person who is a third his age has a score 30% higher than his own.comic boy wrote:Lets face it your simply a cowardly little runt hiding behind a computer screen, disgrace to this site in fact.
Your failure to write anything of substance in any of the threads you comment in shows, not only your inability to write persuasively, but that you are too weak minded to make a comment in a civil manner. If you going to attempt to tell of a child, you should at least to it properly, otherwise youre just sad.RashidJelzin wrote:I typed 4 lines- which takes about 10 seconds. Mind you, I was hard- pressed not to write an 10 paragraph essay in which I "counter" any argument brought forth by a couple of well respected people, just in order to appear like a moron.
There should be a "pat on the head" emoticon, really.
(Oh yikes, I insinuated once more that I deem your childish behaviour inferior- shame on me!)
discuss...-0maxatstuy wrote:How did you take the dildo out after it got stuck up there?

That is your fifth time repeating comment and instead of addressing my prior posts, you are dwelling over an irrelevant piece of information which should have no relevancy over why I was banished for James' decision to flame me and towards why James is a biased mod. That statement was the cause of my first banishment and my following up with that statement was the cause of the second banishment as well. However, there was no reason for James to continually ban me, other than because of his bias, following that point since I didnt say anything that can be considered a flame.owenshooter wrote:it's a new page, and i don't want anyone to lose sight of the comment max made that got
him live chat banned, that he seems to think was an ok comment to make to a female member...
discuss...-0maxatstuy wrote:How did you take the dildo out after it got stuck up there?
p.s.-andy, you are one funny monkey.
psst.. max.. incase you didn't notice, an ADMIN came into your thread and toldmaxatstuy wrote:blah, blah, blah...
if you've already done it, why don't you patiently wait for a reply, like any matureAndyDufresne wrote:Lets get the thread back onto the topic...uh, whatever the original may be now. Max, if you've any personal complaints, you can always take them to E-ticket.
--Andy
