black elk speaks wrote:I think the same thing of your "give everything to everybody" bullshit idea of a Utopian world.
Hooray for Straw-Men! Giving lazy debaters something to shadowbox since 1609.
Seriously, if you're going to spend half your waking hours arguing against somebody at least try to understand them first. The Marxist system that you froth and moan about really isn't what everybody you disagree with is advocating, it's just a straw-man you have grown addicted to whinging about.
black elk speaks wrote:I am sorry that you got into a drunken knife fight and your guts are in that walmart bag over there, but you are just going to have to end your stupid life in an American alley somewhere.
Compassion? What's that? I've never heard of the concept.
Seriously, talk about overstating a proposition BES. Why not just start arguing for a Feudal system if you're so keen on returning to the values of the Middle Ages?
black elk speaks wrote:we allow people to just say "f*ck that, I just want mine now" and skirt the rules because they are too stupid to adhere to them
See, your problem is that you just don't understand what it is that semi-socialist capitalism seeks to achieve or advocates doing.
By blinding yourself to the fact that it aims to help the undeserving poor (choosing instead to rant and rave about the fictionalised concept of it being a machine to donate millions of dollars to the eminently deserving poor) you fail to improve your understanding of its fundamental tennets, rob your arguments of sophistication and elegance, and generally appear as an uninformed extremist boor.
Seriously, calm down for a few minutes and go try to understand what it is you're arguing against. Frothing and howling at a fictionalised red-devil, armed only with cliches and superficial arguments, is a waste of your time, our time, and anybody who ever reads this thread's time.
As things stand, you just don't know enough to make an effective contribution here.