descacador [blocked]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
lancehoch
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: descacador [blocked]

Post by lancehoch »

Big Whiskey wrote:lance,I have been in several games against multi's.Trips/dubs and lost many points because of it.I sent e-tickets while the game was still active and asked if the game could be deleted because the #1 rule was broken.I was told no.I would like to know what we can do as a community to have a new rule put into effect.I don't understand if it's clear there is cheating involved,why the game wouldn't be deleted.I am not just talking about multi's either.The game ronc8649 is talking about and said above the game should be deleted,I agree that it should.Or if they were rewarded there points back instead of the game being deleted.Any response to this would be much appreciated.

If you want a new rule put into effect, you would need to start in Suggs & Bugs. I will tell you this much, if you ask for games to be deleted, it will probably not happen. What if someone reports a 1v1 speed game where they are playing against someone who is a multi? It is very unlikely that a hunter will be on at that exact moment to bust the multi, so the game will probably end. Should that game be deleted? You would say no, since the game is not active. So, what then is the incentive to report people? To have everyone else get their points back? Then people will ask that all games with a multi be deleted. That will cause too much server strain, since everyone's points will have to be recalculated. But, what about the people who won the games against a multi? Why should they lose the points that they won fairly?

Skiman wrote:Not only should this be BUSTED, but CC needs to have a game termination rule.

No, this should not be busted. These are two different individuals.
Big Whiskey
Posts: 1723
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 9:27 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: descacador [blocked]

Post by Big Whiskey »

I see your point lance and thank you for responding.Thanks also for the info.
Image
User avatar
kiddicus maximus
Posts: 136
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:45 am

Re: descacador [blocked]

Post by kiddicus maximus »

I guess I'm okay with them being blocked, though I doubt it will do much to deter them from doing it again under different logins.

Thanks to King Sam, King Achilles and Lancehoch for the insight.

Can you tell us where they live so we can egg their house or put slices of bologna on their cars or something?
User avatar
ronsizzle
Posts: 2553
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: descacador [blocked]

Post by ronsizzle »

kiddicus maximus wrote:I guess I'm okay with them being blocked, though I doubt it will do much to deter them from doing it again under different logins.

Thanks to King Sam, King Achilles and Lancehoch for the insight.

Can you tell us where they live so we can egg their house or put slices of bologna on their cars or something?



the old bologna trick...........you are old school kiddicus
lancehoch
Posts: 4183
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:13 pm

Re: descacador [blocked]

Post by lancehoch »

kiddicus maximus wrote:I guess I'm okay with them being blocked, though I doubt it will do much to deter them from doing it again under different logins.

If they use different logins to try to work together again, then they will be busted for having multiple accounts.
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”