REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY [closed]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by Woodruff »

saxitoxin wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Recently I started a thread which others chose to read and post in.

These "others" now say that I am violating the rules against being "intentionally annoying", all the while I continue to post only in the thread I started.


This is not accurate, as a quick check of the forums will clearly show.


Woodruff - I am allowed to participate in discussion.


You certainly are, which is thoroughly irrelevant to both your statement and mine.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13330
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by saxitoxin »

Woodruff wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Recently I started a thread which others chose to read and post in.

These "others" now say that I am violating the rules against being "intentionally annoying", all the while I continue to post only in the thread I started.


This is not accurate, as a quick check of the forums will clearly show.


Woodruff - I am allowed to participate in discussion.


You certainly are, which is thoroughly irrelevant to both your statement and mine.


Once again, Woodruff is not the discussion judge.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by Woodruff »

saxitoxin wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
saxitoxin wrote:Recently I started a thread which others chose to read and post in.

These "others" now say that I am violating the rules against being "intentionally annoying", all the while I continue to post only in the thread I started.


This is not accurate, as a quick check of the forums will clearly show.


Woodruff - I am allowed to participate in discussion.


You certainly are, which is thoroughly irrelevant to both your statement and mine.


Once again, Woodruff is not the discussion judge.


Nor am I attempting to be, in any way, shape or form. However, I definitely feel another vacation for you coming on...I'm quite sure I'll enjoy it far more than you will.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
saxitoxin
Posts: 13330
Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:01 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by saxitoxin »

Woodruff wrote:
Nor am I attempting to be, in any way, shape or form. However, I definitely feel another vacation for you coming on...I'm quite sure I'll enjoy it far more than you will.


Woodruff - this was a thread for rules clarification, not a thread for threat-making. Please observe topicality before posting.

Here's a link to the forum guidelines for your review:
viewtopic.php?t=7785

If the main point of your post is about something other than what the OP intended, it's not on topic, even if you did post about how you agree with the OP.


Thank you very much for observing good netiquette,
STX
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Tk 421
Posts: 419
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:23 pm

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by Tk 421 »

hmm..... this is gonig to be interesting to watch :P
Image
User avatar
colton24
Posts: 1935
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 9:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alabama

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by colton24 »

saxitoxin wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Nor am I attempting to be, in any way, shape or form. However, I definitely feel another vacation for you coming on...I'm quite sure I'll enjoy it far more than you will.


Woodruff - this was a thread for rules clarification, not a thread for threat-making. Please observe topicality before posting.

Here's a link to the forum guidelines for your review:
viewtopic.php?t=7785

If the main point of your post is about something other than what the OP intended, it's not on topic, even if you did post about how you agree with the OP.


Thank you very much for observing good netiquette,
STX


saxitoxin YOU ARE NOT A MOD so stop telling people to review the rules woodruff isnt breaking any rules at all or trying to be a judge he is giving his OPINION
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed :mrgreen:

One fool reporting for duty!

Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
User avatar
sinctheassasin
Posts: 490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2009 5:57 pm
Gender: Male
Location: probably in chat room, advertising conquer crater

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by sinctheassasin »

Yes, I vote for another vacation for saxitoxin. We would all like that. Man, trying to argue with woodruff was your worst move yet. :D
Woop Woop, i love conquer club, why'd i leave for a year?
Who LIkes finishing what they started? :D
Image
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by Timminz »

It's unfortunate that you are so blatant in your trollery. Soon, you will be left with nothing but the games here, and I've seen how good you are at that (not at all). It's somewhat of a catch-22. The only thing you're good at is trolling, but if you keep it up you'll be banned, and therefore not able to troll these forums any more. But, don't worry. The sweet, sweet irony is not lost on me.
User avatar
Gypsys Kiss
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In a darkened room, beyond the reach of Gods faith

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by Gypsys Kiss »

Timminz wrote:It's unfortunate that you are so blatant in your trollery.



In which case he is in very good company.
Image
User avatar
king achilles
Support Admin
Support Admin
Posts: 13286
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:55 pm
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: REQUEST FOR RULES CLARIFICATION VIS A VIS POLICY ON "ANN..."

Post by king achilles »

To answer your query, I can only suggest that you and everyone else as well, to review the Community Guidelines:

viewtopic.php?t=7785

This will also be locked since some of you can't seem to stop flaming or trolling in this thread.
Image
Please don't have more than 1 account. If you have any CC concerns, you can contact us here.
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”