Moderator: Community Team
I'm not asking you to post for the sake of posting. I'm saying other than jumping on the bandwagon (and now providing your defense) you didn't and haven't really done anything to contribute to town. You haven't advanced the argument on betiko (I do not accept that you felt he acted "weird" qualification as advancing discussion) you merely advanced the vote count.BGtheBrain wrote:So Strikes reasoning for voting me is that (1) I was not contributing and (2) he didnt like my reasoning for the Betiko vote.
(1) I did not participate in the joke vote. i dont see a problem with that. As for the Stoke city rambling nonsense. In the main forum games, I dont like to post "filler" just for the appearance of contributing. I have a hard enough time following a game without trying to figure out who likes what soccer team. If others want to talk about that, its fine, but I wont add to that discussion. Basically there is nothing to talk about that would involve a serious contribution. I will not post just for the sake of posting.
So what about discussion? How does this advance discussion? And why did you choose not to address Betiko's defense that happened right before your post? I assume you chose not to as it does not appear you were fast posted. If you want to vote someone for "acting weird" fine but when someone votes just above you and you choose not to address his points that is insufficient. Whether he acted weird or not. You took no effort upon yourself to advance discussion beyond the vote count itself and I find that scummy.BGtheBrain wrote:(2) I clearly stated my reasoning whether you agree with it or not, is up to you.
Since most of you understand the game, you all know how Day 1 works. Someone is going to be pressured, someone is going to claim, someone will probably get lynched. To deny this, is ridiculous.
How do we get to that point? Well, of course you pressure someone. In this case on day 1 for someone to be acting "weird" is in fact enough for me to vote for someone. I would much rather take my chances on the person behaving "weird" than I would picking the another player who is acting not "weird"
Im sure this will be twisted to appear "BG is eager to lynch anyone" and that is not what I am saying. Im saying that we all know someone will be lynched today and I would rather pressure and/or lynch the person with "weird" behavior than I would people acting normal.
Clarify. How did I avoid trini?BGtheBrain wrote:Strike clearly has a problem and well thought out argument with me here, but he totally avoided any comments on Trini, except for one sentence. Trini's vote was very similar to mine. I dont think there is anything wrong with Trini's vote, I think the intentions were the same as mine.
BGthebrain wrote:Strike allowed about 36 hours after his initial post against me to reiterate his point that he feels I need attention. Why the hurry?
Umm skimming? I did make my case why I did not feel others on the bandwagon deserved as much attention as you for reasons mainly revolving around how much they've contributed outside of the Betiko case. Secondly, you hinted earlier in the post that I did not make a case against trini and that with the exception of one line I didn't address trini (who by the way never actually voted). Look back you'll find that you're wrong.I didnt have a problem with strike coming after me. In my opinion his case is about as strong as the Betiko case, but the same case could be made against others.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Your logic is flawed, we weren't at deadline and we could have waited until someone did something scummy (or played scummy): namely yourselfBGtheBrain wrote:so the options are this.
Randomly pressure someone
Pressure someone who says something kind of weird.

I would disagree that the deadline is irrelevant since we go into the night with a no lynch if we cannot come to agreement by then. That in itself is a significant factor in the game. If it continues as it is going so far we will also go into the night with practically no information at all... which seems like a even worse scenario to me cos then we'll likely be down a townie and be in pretty much the same situation the next day... not much info but 1 less townie.BGtheBrain wrote:The deadline is irrelevant.
This is a universal truth that applies to day 1. Someone must be lynched.
At that time Betiko was by far the best option to at the very least be pressured.

Rodion wrote:9 - How should I play my role?
a) town cop - if you get a guilty result, try to get that person lynched without claiming. Simply build a case against him and hope it works. If his wagon is not picking steam, then you can voluntarily claim your role and your results. If you have an innocent result in someone that is about to be lynched and protective roles are still alive, you can consider claiming to avoid the mislynch. Do notice that you get an innocent when you target the godfather, so it could get tricky. I'm not considering cop sanities because I' don't ever remember seeing a non-sane cop, but if your character has flavour hinting at naiveness/paranoia/insanity you should consider that before publishing your results out in the open.
b) town doctor - protect the cop when he claims! Try to keep a low profile so mafia doesn't see you as a "must die" townie: the more nights you live, the more protection you can give.
c) town mason - first of all, PM the mod and make sure the other mason(s) is town confirmed. If he is, do not let him be lynched (claim if you have to - if he claims and mentions you, confirm his story). If one of you have powers other than "mason", the other could claim that role instead to draw attention away from the real power role (a mason cop / mason duo could have the mason claiming cop, so the real cop would not be killed/roleblocked). You could also pull stunts from this position, but I'm not teaching that as it could backfire.
d) town busdriver - you can use your powers to protect people (cop claimed, doctor is dead, swap cop with someone you consider scummy). Since your powers can cause mischief, be ready to claim if something seems off (say, you swapped players A and B and the cop claims a guilty in B - chances are B is innocent and by staying silent you'll be causing a mislynch, so you should voluntarily claim and explain the cop's guilty is actually related to A, not B).
Busy again, I'll continue it later!
Rodion wrote:9 - How should I play my role?
a) town cop - if you get a guilty result, try to get that person lynched without claiming. Simply build a case against him and hope it works. If his wagon is not picking steam, then you can voluntarily claim your role and your results. If you have an innocent result in someone that is about to be lynched and protective roles are still alive, you can consider claiming to avoid the mislynch. Do notice that you get an innocent when you target the godfather, so it could get tricky. I'm not considering cop sanities because I' don't ever remember seeing a non-sane cop, but if your character has flavour hinting at naiveness/paranoia/insanity you should consider that before publishing your results out in the open.
b) town doctor - protect the cop when he claims! Try to keep a low profile so mafia doesn't see you as a "must die" townie: the more nights you live, the more protection you can give.
c) town mason - first of all, PM the mod and make sure the other mason(s) is town confirmed. If he is, do not let him be lynched (claim if you have to - if he claims and mentions you, confirm his story). If one of you have powers other than "mason", the other could claim that role instead to draw attention away from the real power role (a mason cop / mason duo could have the mason claiming cop, so the real cop would not be killed/roleblocked). You could also pull stunts from this position, but I'm not teaching that as it could backfire.
d) town busdriver - you can use your powers to protect people (cop claimed, doctor is dead, swap cop with someone you consider scummy). Since your powers can cause mischief, be ready to claim if something seems off (say, you swapped players A and B and the cop claims a guilty in B - chances are B is innocent and by staying silent you'll be causing a mislynch, so you should voluntarily claim and explain the cop's guilty is actually related to A, not B).
Busy again, I'll continue it later!
For the record, its called football!MoB Deadly wrote:Rodion wrote:9 - How should I play my role?
a) town cop - if you get a guilty result, try to get that person lynched without claiming. Simply build a case against him and hope it works. If his wagon is not picking steam, then you can voluntarily claim your role and your results. If you have an innocent result in someone that is about to be lynched and protective roles are still alive, you can consider claiming to avoid the mislynch. Do notice that you get an innocent when you target the godfather, so it could get tricky. I'm not considering cop sanities because I' don't ever remember seeing a non-sane cop, but if your character has flavour hinting at naiveness/paranoia/insanity you should consider that before publishing your results out in the open.
b) town doctor - protect the cop when he claims! Try to keep a low profile so mafia doesn't see you as a "must die" townie: the more nights you live, the more protection you can give.
c) town mason - first of all, PM the mod and make sure the other mason(s) is town confirmed. If he is, do not let him be lynched (claim if you have to - if he claims and mentions you, confirm his story). If one of you have powers other than "mason", the other could claim that role instead to draw attention away from the real power role (a mason cop / mason duo could have the mason claiming cop, so the real cop would not be killed/roleblocked). You could also pull stunts from this position, but I'm not teaching that as it could backfire.
d) town busdriver - you can use your powers to protect people (cop claimed, doctor is dead, swap cop with someone you consider scummy). Since your powers can cause mischief, be ready to claim if something seems off (say, you swapped players A and B and the cop claims a guilty in B - chances are B is innocent and by staying silent you'll be causing a mislynch, so you should voluntarily claim and explain the cop's guilty is actually related to A, not B).
Busy again, I'll continue it later!
Nice post Rodion, I would really like to see you make a full strategy guide and get it stickied! (I will help if you want!) However, I agree with BG that this isn't really the place to put it. Could you please keep it to Mafia Discussions for now? We have had enough side tracking with the whole soccer team kabosh, we dont need this here too.
Like trini said, if we continue at this rate, we will have nothing at all to go on
Im from America, therefore I am ignorant of the rest of the worldjonty125 wrote:
For the record, its called football!
Considering the amount of effort I've put into making cases against Bg and trini, I am a bit insulted right now.MoB Deadly wrote:Rodion wrote:9 - How should I play my role?
a) town cop - if you get a guilty result, try to get that person lynched without claiming. Simply build a case against him and hope it works. If his wagon is not picking steam, then you can voluntarily claim your role and your results. If you have an innocent result in someone that is about to be lynched and protective roles are still alive, you can consider claiming to avoid the mislynch. Do notice that you get an innocent when you target the godfather, so it could get tricky. I'm not considering cop sanities because I' don't ever remember seeing a non-sane cop, but if your character has flavour hinting at naiveness/paranoia/insanity you should consider that before publishing your results out in the open.
b) town doctor - protect the cop when he claims! Try to keep a low profile so mafia doesn't see you as a "must die" townie: the more nights you live, the more protection you can give.
c) town mason - first of all, PM the mod and make sure the other mason(s) is town confirmed. If he is, do not let him be lynched (claim if you have to - if he claims and mentions you, confirm his story). If one of you have powers other than "mason", the other could claim that role instead to draw attention away from the real power role (a mason cop / mason duo could have the mason claiming cop, so the real cop would not be killed/roleblocked). You could also pull stunts from this position, but I'm not teaching that as it could backfire.
d) town busdriver - you can use your powers to protect people (cop claimed, doctor is dead, swap cop with someone you consider scummy). Since your powers can cause mischief, be ready to claim if something seems off (say, you swapped players A and B and the cop claims a guilty in B - chances are B is innocent and by staying silent you'll be causing a mislynch, so you should voluntarily claim and explain the cop's guilty is actually related to A, not B).
Busy again, I'll continue it later!
Nice post Rodion, I would really like to see you make a full strategy guide and get it stickied! (I will help if you want!) However, I agree with BG that this isn't really the place to put it. Could you please keep it to Mafia Discussions for now? We have had enough side tracking with the whole soccer team kabosh, we dont need this here too.
Like trini said, if we continue at this rate, we will have nothing at all to go on
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Just completely ignore the guide while I'm alive in the game. After I die, check it.MoB Deadly wrote:Could you please keep it to Mafia Discussions for now? We have had enough side tracking with the whole soccer team kabosh, we dont need this here too.
Im sorry Strike Wolf, I DO appreciate your cases, you are one of the few that ARE contributing. I just dont agree with the cases enough to put a vote on them. I hate D1 so muchstrike wolf wrote:
Considering the amount of effort I've put into making cases against Bg and trini, I am a bit insulted right now.


I'll run through and update my last posting list when i get home in an hour or so.safariguy5 wrote:Just post who you want me to prod, I'll send out the prod's ASAP.
you're skimming goes beyond trini voting or not.BGtheBrain wrote:I thought Trini voted, but in fact trini didnt. He did hint at voting, but never actually did. Thats my bad.
Quite simply. Yes. Fluff happens day 1. It can be annoying and distracting but it is something that happens. I cannot crucify anyone for the fluff in this game. Even if it may be tempting. Your lack of contribution (which extends beyond not participating in the fluff) is a more reliable sign of scum behavior.Bgthebrain wrote:so my lack of contribution is a greater threat than the people posting nonsense and distracting from the game?
And I made it clear why I did not feel it was adequate in terms of what was happening in the game/BGtheBrain wrote:I stated my reasoning for the vote.
so the options are this.
Randomly pressure someone
Pressure someone who says something kind of weird.
A few things about this don't add up.bgthebrain wrote:It seems to me your main concern was that I did not address betikos defense of himself. I didnt address it because I felt it was pointless backtracking and I dont think he was being honest. I think he meant his original statement and to clarify it later, had no impact on my feeling that the statement and unjustified trust was in fact weird.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
MoB Deadly wrote:Im sorry Strike Wolf, I DO appreciate your cases, you are one of the few that ARE contributing. I just dont agree with the cases enough to put a vote on them. I hate D1 so muchstrike wolf wrote:
Considering the amount of effort I've put into making cases against Bg and trini, I am a bit insulted right now.
unvote vote BG For always causing D1 rivalry. First Squirrel, now strikeBGtheBrain wrote:*sigh*
Strike makes case - no one follows
Strike makes case - no one follows
Strike makes case - no one follows
Strike feels insulted - no one follows
Strike makes case - TBD